Suppr超能文献

LIMB-Q德文版的全面验证

Comprehensive Validation of the German Version of the LIMB-Q.

作者信息

Besmens Inga S, Watson Jennifer A, Akyildiz Efe, Mundy Lily R, Giovanoli Pietro, Calcagni Maurizio, Lindenblatt Nicole

机构信息

From the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2025 Mar 1;94(3):365-369. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004175. Epub 2024 Dec 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Lower extremity trauma significantly impacts patients' lives, requiring a nuanced approach to evaluate outcomes beyond clinical measures. The LIMB-Q, a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), assesses the multifaceted impacts of lower extremity trauma, including physical and emotional dimensions, from the patient's perspective. This study validates the German version of the LIMB-Q.

METHODS

We relied on the translation of the LIMB-Q that had followed the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research best practice guidelines. Sixty patients who had undergone reconstructive surgery or amputation of the lower limb completed the LIMB-Q, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Internal consistency of the German LIMB-Q was determined by Cronbach's alpha, and reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Construct validity was analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients between the LIMB-Q, LEFS, and SF-36.

RESULTS

Validation involved 60 patients. Internal consistency in a test-retest subset of 5 patients was good to excellent (α: 0.891 to 0.965). The intraclass correlation coefficient for these scales ranged from 0.821 to 1. The LIMB-Q domains significantly correlated with the corresponding domains of the SF-36 and LEFS, confirming excellent construct validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The German version of the LIMB-Q is conceptually equivalent to the original English version. It is a reliable and valid PROM for assessing physical and psychological impairments in patients who have undergone lower extremity reconstructive surgery or amputation.

摘要

目的

下肢创伤对患者的生活有重大影响,需要采用细致入微的方法来评估临床指标以外的结果。LIMB-Q是一种患者报告结局量表(PROM),从患者角度评估下肢创伤的多方面影响,包括身体和情感维度。本研究对LIMB-Q德语版进行验证。

方法

我们依据遵循国际药物经济学与结局研究学会最佳实践指南的LIMB-Q翻译版本。60例接受下肢重建手术或截肢的患者完成了LIMB-Q、下肢功能量表(LEFS)和简短健康调查问卷(SF-36)。德语LIMB-Q的内部一致性通过克朗巴赫α系数确定,可靠性使用组内相关系数进行评估。使用LIMB-Q、LEFS和SF-36之间的皮尔逊相关系数分析结构效度。

结果

验证涉及60例患者。5例患者的重测子集中的内部一致性良好至优秀(α:0.891至0.965)。这些量表的组内相关系数范围为0.821至1。LIMB-Q各领域与SF-36和LEFS的相应领域显著相关,证实了良好的结构效度。

结论

LIMB-Q德语版在概念上等同于原始英文版。它是一种可靠且有效的患者报告结局量表,用于评估接受下肢重建手术或截肢患者的身体和心理损伤。

相似文献

1
Comprehensive Validation of the German Version of the LIMB-Q.
Ann Plast Surg. 2025 Mar 1;94(3):365-369. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004175. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
2
Cultural adaption and multicenter validation of the German version of the LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Jul;10(4):922-928.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
3
The LIMB-Q: Reliability and Validity of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Patients with Lower Extremity Trauma.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Dec 1;154(6):1332-1340. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011293. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
6
Translation and Validation of the German New Knee Society Scoring System.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Feb;477(2):383-393. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000555.
7
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale.
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(9):897-904. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1066452. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
8
The Reliability and Validity of Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire-Leg in Turkish Patients with Lower Limb Lymphedema.
Lymphat Res Biol. 2020 Feb;18(1):42-48. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2018.0048. Epub 2019 May 24.
9
Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the prosthesis evaluation questionnaire.
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Aug;40(17):2081-2087. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1323032. Epub 2017 May 9.

本文引用的文献

1
German Translation and Linguistic Validation of the LIMB‑Q: A Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Lower Extremity Trauma.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jul 19;12(7):e6001. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006001. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
The LIMB-Q: Reliability and Validity of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Patients with Lower Extremity Trauma.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Dec 1;154(6):1332-1340. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011293. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
3
How to measure success in lower extremity reconstruction, which outcome measurements do we use a systematic review and metanalysis.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023 Feb-Dec;57(1-6):505-532. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2023.2168274. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
4
Multidisciplinary Extremity Preservation Program Improves Quality of Life for Patients with Advanced Limb Threat.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;87:302-310. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.05.047. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
5
Contemporary approach to soft-tissue reconstruction of the lower extremity after trauma.
Burns Trauma. 2021 Jul 30;9:tkab024. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkab024. eCollection 2021.
6
Content Validity of the LIMB-Q: A Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Lower Extremity Trauma Patients.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 Nov;36(9):625-633. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713669. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
8
Assessment of Function after Free Tissue Transfer to the Lower Extremity for Chronic Wounds Using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Jun;34(5):327-333. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1621736. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
9
Measurement Properties of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale: A Systematic Review.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Mar;46(3):200-16. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6165. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
10
Cultural Influences on Pain.
Rev Pain. 2008 Mar;1(2):6-9. doi: 10.1177/204946370800100203.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验