Borde Tabea, Varble Nicole A, Hazen Lindsey A, Saccenti Laetitia, Garcia Charisse, Digennaro Meredith, Gurram Sandeep, Pinto Peter A, Turkbey Baris, Wood Bradford J
Center for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Philips Healthcare, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
J Urol. 2025 Apr;213(4):428-436. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004368. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
Our goal was to determine whether the difference between MRI-based and ultrasound (US)-based volume measurements are associated with MRI/US-targeted fusion-guided biopsy outcomes.
This retrospective, single-center study involved 4177 consecutive patients biopsied between 2010 and 2023 using both MRI/US-targeted fusion and systematic biopsy. Biopsies were indicated because of elevated PSA levels or abnormal multiparametric MRI results. US volume measurements were calculated using the triplane ellipsoid formula, and MRI volumes were obtained by semiautomatic planimetric segmentation. Performance of fusion biopsy compared with systematic biopsy was analyzed with respect to the discordance between MRI and US volume measurements.
In 2736 patients (66%), biopsy detected prostate cancer. In cases where both techniques yielded prostate cancers (1695/2736 [62%]), a statistically higher proportion of patients had higher Gleason scores on MRI/US-targeted fusion biopsy compared with systematic biopsy (343 patients [20.2%] vs 137 patients [8.1%], < .001). MRI volume measurements were significantly smaller compared with US volume measurements (median [IQR] 54 mL [39-77], 56 mL [40-80], respectively, < .001). Beyond 5 mL volume discordance, MRI/US-targeted fusion biopsy gradually showed less added diagnostic benefit compared with systematic biopsy. In the ≤ 5 mL cohort, MRI/US-targeted fusion biopsy detected more aggressive tumors in 4 times as many patients as systematic biopsy (136 vs 32 patients, < .001).
Although MRI/US-targeted fusion biopsy detected more prostate cancers than systematic biopsy, the performance of MRI/US-targeted fusion biopsy declined with more discordance between volumes measured in MRI vs US. Awareness of volume discordance in MRI- and US-based volume measurements should alert the operator about the possibility of reduced performance of MRI/US-targeted fusion biopsy.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO.: NCT00102544.
我们的目标是确定基于MRI和基于超声(US)的体积测量之间的差异是否与MRI/US靶向融合引导活检结果相关。
这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了2010年至2023年间连续进行活检的4177例患者,这些患者同时接受了MRI/US靶向融合活检和系统活检。活检的指征为前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平升高或多参数MRI结果异常。US体积测量采用三平面椭圆公式计算,MRI体积通过半自动平面测量分割获得。针对MRI和US体积测量之间的不一致性,分析了融合活检与系统活检相比的性能。
2736例患者(66%)活检发现前列腺癌。在两种技术均检测到前列腺癌的病例中(1695/2736 [62%]),与系统活检相比,MRI/US靶向融合活检中Gleason评分较高的患者比例在统计学上更高(343例患者[20.2%]对137例患者[8.1%],P <.001)。与US体积测量相比,MRI体积测量明显更小(中位数[四分位间距]分别为54 mL [39 - 77]、56 mL [40 - 80],P <.001)。当体积不一致超过5 mL时,与系统活检相比,MRI/US靶向融合活检逐渐显示出较少的额外诊断益处。在体积不一致≤5 mL的队列中,MRI/US靶向融合活检检测到的侵袭性肿瘤患者数量是系统活检的4倍(136例对32例患者,P <.001)。
尽管MRI/US靶向融合活检比系统活检检测到更多的前列腺癌,但随着MRI和US测量体积之间的不一致性增加,MRI/US靶向融合活检的性能会下降。了解基于MRI和US的体积测量中的体积不一致性应提醒操作人员注意MRI/US靶向融合活检性能降低的可能性。
NCT00102544。