• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管癌:基于肿瘤负荷评分的分层分析

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Stratified analysis based on tumor burden score.

作者信息

Li Hongxin, Kong Junjie, Si Wei, Wang Tao, Ji Min, Li Guangbing, Liu Jun

机构信息

Department of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Ji'nan, Shandong, China.

Department of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Ji'nan, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Biosci Trends. 2025 Jan 14;18(6):584-598. doi: 10.5582/bst.2024.01277. Epub 2024 Dec 12.

DOI:10.5582/bst.2024.01277
PMID:39662953
Abstract

The role of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains debated. This study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of LLR vs. open liver resection (OLR) in ICC stratified by tumor burden score (TBS). ICC patients who underwent LLR or OLR were included from a multicenter database between July 2009 and October 2022. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on whether the TBS was > 5.3. A 1:3 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed between LLR and OLR in each cohort. Cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors for ICC. A total of 626 patients were included in this study, 304 and 322 patients were classified into the low- and high-TBS groups, respectively. In the low-TBS group, after PSM, LLR was associated with less blood loss, lower CCI, fewer complications and shorter hospital stay (all p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that LLR had better OS (p = 0.032). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that surgical procedure was an independent prognostic factor for ICC (HR: 0.445; 95% CI: 0.235-0.843; p = 0.013). In the high-TBS group, after PSM, LLR were associated with reduced blood loss, lower CCI, fewer complications and shorter hospital stay (all p < 0.05), while OS (p = 0.98) and DFS (p = 0.24) were similar between the two groups. TBS is an important prognostic factor for ICC. LLR is a safe and feasible option for ICC and leads to faster postoperative recovery. LLR can offer ICC a comparable and even better long-term prognosis than OLR.

摘要

腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)治疗肝内胆管癌(ICC)的作用仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估按肿瘤负荷评分(TBS)分层的ICC患者中LLR与开腹肝切除术(OLR)的短期和长期结局。2009年7月至2022年10月期间,从一个多中心数据库中纳入接受LLR或OLR的ICC患者。根据TBS是否>5.3将患者分为两个队列。在每个队列的LLR和OLR之间进行1:3倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析。采用Cox回归分析确定ICC的预后因素。本研究共纳入626例患者,304例和322例患者分别被分类为低TBS组和高TBS组。在低TBS组中,PSM后,LLR与更少的失血、更低的CCI、更少的并发症和更短的住院时间相关(所有p<0.05)。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示LLR有更好的总生存期(p = 0.032)。多变量Cox回归分析表明手术方式是ICC的独立预后因素(HR:0.445;95%CI:0.235 - 0.843;p = 0.013)。在高TBS组中,PSM后,LLR与失血减少、CCI降低、并发症减少和住院时间缩短相关(所有p<0.05),而两组之间的总生存期(p = 0.98)和无病生存期(p = 0.24)相似。TBS是ICC的重要预后因素。LLR是ICC的一种安全可行的选择,可导致术后更快恢复。与OLR相比,LLR可为ICC提供相当甚至更好的长期预后。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Stratified analysis based on tumor burden score.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管癌:基于肿瘤负荷评分的分层分析
Biosci Trends. 2025 Jan 14;18(6):584-598. doi: 10.5582/bst.2024.01277. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
2
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic versus open liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术联合淋巴结清扫术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌的安全性和可行性。
Biosci Trends. 2020 Nov 4;14(5):376-383. doi: 10.5582/bst.2020.03293. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
3
Laparoscopic liver resection as a treatment option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.腹腔镜肝切除术作为治疗肝内胆管细胞癌的一种选择。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jun;76(3):869-878. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01803-9. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
4
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched study.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌的安全性和可行性:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Apr 10;21(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03004-x.
5
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review of propensity score-matched studies.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌:倾向评分匹配研究的系统评价。
Updates Surg. 2023 Dec;75(8):2049-2061. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01648-8. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
6
Laparoscopic versus open resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: nationwide analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝内胆管癌切除术的比较:全国性分析。
Br J Surg. 2021 Apr 30;108(4):419-426. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa110.
7
Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞胆管癌合并症的围手术期及肿瘤学结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):967-976. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09579-y. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
8
Laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: 3-year outcomes of a cohort study with propensity score matching.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌:倾向评分匹配队列研究的 3 年结果。
Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;33:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
9
Is laparoscopic liver resection safe for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A meta-analysis.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝内胆管癌安全吗?一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 May;47(5):979-989. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.310. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
10
Assessment of Textbook Outcome in Laparoscopic and Open Liver Surgery.腹腔镜与开腹肝手术的教科书结局评估。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Aug 1;156(8):e212064. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2064. Epub 2021 Aug 11.