Hopkins Noah, Reece Chase, Hansen Nathan, Proctor Christina
Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12898. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12898.
The purpose of this study was to identify and test the factor structure of the Agricultural Producer Barriers to Care Scale (APBCS), which assesses barriers to engaging with health care in rural US farmers.
Respondents (n = 1045) completed an online survey that was distributed digitally and in-person by researchers and community partners at farming events and via farm-related social media. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were used to assess the underlying factor structure of the APBCS, and McDonald's omega coefficients were calculated to test the reliability of each factor and the instrument as a whole. Data analysis was conducted in SPSS 28.0 and MPlus Version 7.4.
The exploratory factor analysis (n = 689) indicated a four-factor structure for the APBCS with domains of (i) formal health care challenges, (ii) cultural barriers to help-seeking, (iii) stigma, and (iv) resilience, which explained 38.408% of the overall variance. The confirmatory factor analysis (n = 231) found that a three-factor structure, where questions from "cultural barriers to help seeking" were applied to factors for stigma and resilience, was a better fit for the model than the four-factor model hypothesized by the EFA. The final APBCS showed reliability within each domain, and across the full three-factor scale.
The APBCS is a promising tool that shows high internal consistency and could inform researchers and practitioners about the structural and cultural barriers to engaging with health care in agricultural producers living in the United States.
本研究旨在识别并检验农业生产者就医障碍量表(APBCS)的因子结构,该量表用于评估美国农村农民在寻求医疗保健方面的障碍。
受访者(n = 1045)完成了一项在线调查,该调查由研究人员和社区合作伙伴在农业活动现场以及通过与农场相关的社交媒体以数字方式和面对面方式进行分发。探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析用于评估APBCS的潜在因子结构,并计算麦克唐纳ω系数以检验每个因子以及整个量表的可靠性。数据分析在SPSS 28.0和MPlus 7.4版本中进行。
探索性因子分析(n = 689)表明,APBCS具有四因子结构,其领域包括:(i)正规医疗保健挑战,(ii)寻求帮助的文化障碍,(iii)耻辱感,以及(iv)恢复力,这解释了总方差的38.408%。验证性因子分析(n = 231)发现,与探索性因子分析假设的四因子模型相比,将“寻求帮助的文化障碍”中的问题应用于耻辱感和恢复力因子的三因子结构更适合该模型。最终的APBCS在每个领域以及整个三因子量表中均显示出可靠性。
APBCS是一个很有前景的工具,具有较高的内部一致性,可为研究人员和从业者提供有关美国农业生产者在寻求医疗保健方面的结构和文化障碍的信息。