• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节镜下使用缝线带增强技术修复前交叉韧带:至少3年随访的临床、功能和步态分析结果

Arthroscopic ACL repair with suture tape augmentation: clinical, functional, and gait analysis outcomes at minimum 3-year follow-up.

作者信息

Saggar Rachit, Mhaskar Vikram Arun, Bansal Rohit

机构信息

Vardhaman Mohair Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Dec 12;35(1):39. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04161-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00590-024-04161-9
PMID:39666194
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Recent advancements in surgical techniques have led to renewed interest in ACL repair, particularly for acute, proximal tears. Suture tape augmentation (STA) has emerged as a promising technique to support ACL healing while preserving native tissue and potentially improving outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of ACL repair with STA in patients with acute, proximal ACL tears.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ACL repair with STA between June 2018 and October 2020. Inclusion criteria were acute (< 6 weeks) ACL rupture, Sherman type I tears, and minimum follow-up of 3 years. Exclusion criteria included mid-substance or distal ACL tears and previous knee surgeries. Clinical evaluation involved stability tests, PROMs, and gait analysis using Prokin WalkerView. Second-look arthroscopy and histological analysis were conducted on a subset of patients.

RESULTS

Twelve consecutive patients (7 males and 5 females) with a mean age of 27.4 ± 7.9 years and mean BMI of 23.3 ± 1.6 kg/mwere included. Time to operation was 19.5 ± 8.7 days. Mean follow-up duration was 53.2 ± 9.4 months. One patient experienced a traumatic re-rupture. One had a contralateral ACL tear and one experienced hardware irritation. Clinical tests were negative for instability in all patients. Post-operative IKDC, Lysholm, and FJS-12 scores showed significant improvement (p < 0.001). All patients (100%) achieved minimal clinically important difference for all PROMs. Walking gait analysis revealed high symmetry indices for range of motion (93.50%) and step length (95.80%) with near symmetrical loading. Second-look arthroscopy showed intact repairs with healthy tissue morphology and integration. Histology revealed increased cellularity, high nuclear density, and preservation of vascular and neural components indicated by CD34 and S-100 markers.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic ACL repair with STA provides favourable clinical, functional, and histological outcomes with low re-rupture rates when performed on acute, proximal ACL tears. This technique demonstrates fair-to-good PROMs, functional stability, and near-normal gait parameters.

摘要

引言

外科技术的最新进展引发了人们对前交叉韧带(ACL)修复的新兴趣,尤其是对于急性近端撕裂伤。缝线带增强术(STA)已成为一种有前景的技术,可在保留天然组织的同时支持ACL愈合,并有可能改善治疗效果。本研究旨在评估采用STA对急性近端ACL撕裂伤患者进行ACL修复的效果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2018年6月至2020年10月期间接受STA ACL修复的患者。纳入标准为急性(<6周)ACL断裂、Sherman I型撕裂伤,且最短随访时间为3年。排除标准包括ACL中部或远端撕裂伤以及既往膝关节手术史。临床评估包括稳定性测试、患者报告结局测量(PROMs)以及使用Prokin WalkerView进行步态分析。对部分患者进行了二次关节镜检查和组织学分析。

结果

连续纳入12例患者(7例男性和5例女性),平均年龄27.4±7.9岁,平均体重指数23.3±1.6kg/m²。手术时间为19.5±8.7天。平均随访时间为53.2±9.4个月。1例患者发生创伤性再断裂。1例对侧ACL撕裂,1例出现内植物刺激。所有患者的临床测试均未发现不稳定。术后国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)、Lysholm和FJS-12评分均有显著改善(p<0.001)。所有患者(100%)在所有PROMs方面均达到了最小临床重要差异。步行步态分析显示,运动范围(93.50%)和步长(95.80%)的对称性指数较高,负重接近对称。二次关节镜检查显示修复完整,组织形态健康且融合良好。组织学检查显示细胞增多、核密度高,CD34和S-100标记物表明血管和神经成分得以保留。

结论

对于急性近端ACL撕裂伤,采用STA进行关节镜下ACL修复可提供良好的临床、功能和组织学效果,再断裂率低。该技术显示出较好至良好的PROMs、功能稳定性和接近正常的步态参数。

相似文献

1
Arthroscopic ACL repair with suture tape augmentation: clinical, functional, and gait analysis outcomes at minimum 3-year follow-up.关节镜下使用缝线带增强技术修复前交叉韧带:至少3年随访的临床、功能和步态分析结果
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Dec 12;35(1):39. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04161-9.
2
Promising functional outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture augmentation.前交叉韧带修复术后采用缝线增强技术可获得良好的功能结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul;31(7):2836-2843. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07236-4. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
3
Suture tape augmentation ACL repair, stable knee, and favorable PROMs, but a re-rupture rate of 11% within 2 years.关节镜下 ACL 修复中使用缝线袢钢板技术,膝关节稳定,关节活动度恢复满意,但术后 2 年内有 11%的再断裂率。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Nov;29(11):3706-3714. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06399-2. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
4
Satisfactory patient-reported outcomes at 5 years following primary repair with suture tape augmentation for proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears.前交叉韧带近端撕裂采用缝线带增强修复后 5 年的患者满意度报告结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jan;30(1):253-259. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06485-z. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
5
Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears: outcomes of the first 56 consecutive patients and the role of additional internal bracing.关节镜下初次修复前交叉韧带近端撕裂:56 例连续患者的初步结果和附加内部支撑的作用。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):21-28. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5338-z. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
6
Anterior cruciate ligament repair with Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement: a case series with 2-year follow-up.前交叉韧带修复联合独立缝线加强:2 年随访的病例系列研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):60-67. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5239-1. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
7
Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair for proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears in skeletally immature patients: Surgical technique and preliminary results.关节镜下前交叉韧带修复术治疗骨骼未成熟患者的近端前交叉韧带撕裂:手术技术及初步结果
Knee. 2017 Jan;24(1):40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.09.017. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
8
Is Primary Arthroscopic Repair Using the Pulley Technique an Effective Treatment for Partial Proximal ACL Tears?经皮滑轮技术修复部分前交叉韧带股骨止点撕脱骨折的疗效分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 May;478(5):1031-1045. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001118.
9
[Medium- to long-term follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament rupture and repair in healing response technique].[前交叉韧带断裂并采用愈合反应技术修复后的中长期随访]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2013 Dec;151(6):570-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350874. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
10
Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.单纯前交叉韧带重建与前交叉韧带重建联合前外侧韧带缝合带增强的疗效比较。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2021;32(1):129-136. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption Between Primary Repair and Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.前交叉韧带初次修复与重建术后疼痛及阿片类药物使用量的前瞻性比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Sep 29;11(9):23259671231187442. doi: 10.1177/23259671231187442. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Stabilization and Gap Formation of Adjustable Versus Fixed Primary ACL Repair With Internal Brace: An in Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.使用内置支撑装置的可调式与固定式原发性前交叉韧带修复的稳定性及间隙形成:一项体外全结构生物力学尸体研究。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Sep 29;11(9):23259671231201462. doi: 10.1177/23259671231201462. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Suture-Augmented Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair for Proximal Avulsion or High-Grade Partial Tears Shows Similar Side-to-Side Difference and No Clinical Differences at Two Years Versus Conventional Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction for Mid-Substance Tears or Poor Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tissue Quality.
缝线增强前交叉韧带修复术治疗近端撕脱或高级部分撕裂与传统前交叉韧带重建术治疗中节段撕裂或前交叉韧带组织质量差相比,在两年时的侧-侧差异和临床结果无差异。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Mar;40(3):857-867. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
4
Comparison of Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Structures to Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis at 2-Year Follow-up.2 年随访比较前交叉韧带和前外侧结构的初次修复与重建和外侧关节外腱固定术。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;51(9):2300-2312. doi: 10.1177/03635465231178301. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
5
Graft failure and revision rate after ACL repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization. One-year results of a prospective case series of 155 patients.前交叉韧带修复术中采用动态韧带内稳定技术后的移植物失败率和翻修率。155例患者前瞻性病例系列的1年结果。
J Exp Orthop. 2023 May 5;10(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00614-y.
6
Promising functional outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture augmentation.前交叉韧带修复术后采用缝线增强技术可获得良好的功能结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul;31(7):2836-2843. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07236-4. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
7
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptom State, and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis From the SANTI Study Group.前交叉韧带修复与重建的最小临床重要差异、患者可接受的症状状态和临床结局:来自 SANTI 研究组的配对分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Nov;50(13):3522-3532. doi: 10.1177/03635465221126171. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
8
Clinical outcomes in stump-preserving versus stump-sacrificing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; a randomized controlled study.保残肢与牺牲残肢的前交叉韧带重建的临床结果:一项随机对照研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jul 23;23(1):703. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05665-3.
9
Primary Repair for Treating Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: A Histological Analysis and Prospective Clinical Trial.治疗急性近端前交叉韧带撕裂的一期修复:组织学分析与前瞻性临床试验
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 May 27;10:913900. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.913900. eCollection 2022.
10
ACL repair for athletes?为运动员进行前交叉韧带修复?
J Orthop. 2022 Apr 7;31:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.04.001. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.