Khatri Dipti, Falconer Nazanin, Coulter Sonali, Gray Leonard C, Paterson David L, Freeman Christopher
UQ Centre for Health Service Research (CHSR), Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland & Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Am J Infect Control. 2025 Apr;53(4):479-484. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2024.12.001. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
Antibiograms can optimize empirical antibiotic prescribing; however, they are not readily available for residential aged care facilities (RACFs) in Queensland, Australia. This study aimed to determine whether alternatively available data can be used to approximate resistance patterns for RACFs.
Annual RACF-specific antibiograms were compared with local hospital antibiograms accessed through pathology providers. Additionally, composite antibiograms, of geographically united RACF data, were compared with regional hospital and private pathology RACF antibiograms. Antibiotic susceptibility rates for commonly observed bacteria (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus) were compared among different antibiograms using Fisher exact test, with a P value ≤ 0.05 indicating the statistically significant difference. The concordance among the antibiograms was described by percentage similarity overall and for a subset of clinically relevant pathogen-antibiotic pairs.
Composite RACF antibiogram was highly concordant (83%-100% similarity) to private pathology RACF data when compared for clinically relevant pathogen-antibiotic pairs. Mixed results were found when individual RACF-specific antibiograms were compared with local hospital all-ages and ≥ 65 years data (50%-100% and 67%-100% similarity, respectively).
Private pathology RACF antibiograms can serve as a proxy indicator of resistance patterns for RACFs. Mixed findings were noted for comparisons with hospital data.
抗菌谱可优化经验性抗生素处方;然而,在澳大利亚昆士兰州的老年护理机构(RACF)中,抗菌谱不易获取。本研究旨在确定是否可以使用其他可得数据来估算老年护理机构的耐药模式。
将年度特定老年护理机构抗菌谱与通过病理供应商获取的当地医院抗菌谱进行比较。此外,还将地理上统一的老年护理机构数据的综合抗菌谱与地区医院和私立病理机构的老年护理机构抗菌谱进行比较。使用Fisher精确检验比较不同抗菌谱中常见细菌(大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、粪肠球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌)的抗生素敏感性率,P值≤0.05表示差异有统计学意义。通过总体百分比相似性以及临床相关病原体 - 抗生素对的子集来描述抗菌谱之间的一致性。
当比较临床相关病原体 - 抗生素对时,综合老年护理机构抗菌谱与私立病理机构老年护理机构数据高度一致(相似性为83% - 100%)。将个别老年护理机构特定抗菌谱与当地医院全年龄段和≥65岁数据进行比较时,结果不一(相似性分别为50% - 100%和67% - 100%)。
私立病理机构老年护理机构抗菌谱可作为老年护理机构耐药模式的替代指标。与医院数据比较时发现结果不一。