Wang Yuanying, Sun Di, Song Yawen, Du Xuqin, Wu Na, Ye Qiao
Clinical Center for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Nov 30;16(11):7383-7396. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-922. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
There is uncertainty with respect to the baseline tumor markers and clinical outcomes for patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). The study aimed to assess the association between baseline tumor markers and progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) and prognosis.
This is a prospective cohort study. Serum levels of nine tumor markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen, cytokeratin fraction 21-1 (CYFRA21-1), serum ferritin (SF), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and carbohydrate antigen 724 (CA724) were collected at baseline in patients with CTD-ILD and healthy controls (HCs). Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the strength of baseline tumor markers in identifying PPF in CTD-ILD. Correlation analysis was performed to explore associations between tumor markers and disease severity. The relationship of prognosis and these markers was also evaluated.
There were 224 patients with CTD-ILD and 63 HCs included in the analysis. The serum CEA and CA125 levels were significantly higher in the PPF group than in the non-PPF and HC groups. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of CEA was 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.72], the highest among the tested tumor markers. For CA125, the AUC was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.51-0.68). Patients were then stratified into low-titre and high-titre groups based on the median levels of CEA or CA125. Compared with the low CEA group, patients in the high CEA group showed a higher risk for PPF [odds ratio (OR): 3.42, 95% CI: 1.74-6.72, P<0.001], while compared with the low CA125 group, patients in the high CA125 group had an OR of 1.96 (95% CI: 1.08-3.55, P=0.03). Elevated CEA concentration remained a significant risk factor of PPF in multivariate analysis, but CA125 did not. Furthermore, elevated CEA levels was also an independent risk factor associated with all-cause mortality and acute exacerbation (AE) in CTD-ILD patients.
Circulating CEA may be associated with pulmonary fibrosis progression and prognosis of CTD-ILD.
结缔组织病相关间质性肺病(CTD-ILD)患者的基线肿瘤标志物与临床结局存在不确定性。本研究旨在评估基线肿瘤标志物与进行性肺纤维化(PPF)及预后之间的关联。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究。收集CTD-ILD患者和健康对照者(HCs)基线时的9种肿瘤标志物血清水平,包括癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原125(CA125)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、鳞状细胞癌(SCC)抗原、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)、血清铁蛋白(SF)、甲胎蛋白(AFP)和糖类抗原724(CA724)。采用逻辑回归和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估基线肿瘤标志物在识别CTD-ILD患者PPF中的强度。进行相关性分析以探讨肿瘤标志物与疾病严重程度之间的关联。还评估了预后与这些标志物的关系。
分析纳入了224例CTD-ILD患者和63例HCs。PPF组血清CEA和CA125水平显著高于非PPF组和HC组。CEA的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.64[95%置信区间(CI):0.56 - 0.72],在所有检测的肿瘤标志物中最高。CA125的AUC为0.59(95%CI:0.51 - 0.68)。然后根据CEA或CA125的中位数水平将患者分为低水平组和高水平组。与低CEA组相比,高CEA组患者发生PPF的风险更高[比值比(OR):3.42,95%CI:1.74 - 6.72,P<0.001],而与低CA125组相比,高CA125组患者的OR为1.96(95%CI:1.08 - 3.55,P = 0.03)。在多因素分析中,CEA浓度升高仍然是PPF的显著危险因素,但CA125不是。此外,CEA水平升高也是CTD-ILD患者全因死亡率和急性加重(AE)的独立危险因素。
循环CEA可能与CTD-ILD的肺纤维化进展及预后相关。