Suppr超能文献

通过超声检查和化学分析评估冷冻长鳍金枪鱼的切尾情况。

Assessment of Tail-Cutting in Frozen Albacore () Through Ultrasound Inspection and Chemical Analysis.

作者信息

Yagi Masafumi, Sakai Akira, Yasutomi Suguru, Suzuki Kanata, Kashikura Hiroki, Goto Keiichi

机构信息

School of Marine Science and Technology, Tokai University, 3-20-1 Orido, Shimizu-ku, Shizuoka-shi 424-8610, Shizuoka, Japan.

Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Fujitsu Limited, 4-1-1 Kamikodanaka, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki-shi 211-8588, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Foods. 2024 Nov 29;13(23):3860. doi: 10.3390/foods13233860.

Abstract

Fat content is the main criterion for evaluating albacore quality. However, no reports exist on the accuracy of the tail-cutting method, a method used to assess the fat content of albacore. Here, we evaluated this method by comparing it with chemical analysis and ultrasound inspection. We measured the actual fat content in albacore using chemical analysis and compared the results with those obtained using the tail-cutting method. Significant discrepancies (99% CI, -test) were observed in fat content among the tail-cutting samples. Using chemical analysis as the ground truth, the accuracy of tail-cutting from two different companies was 70.0% for company A and 51.9% for company B. An ultrasound inspection revealed that a higher fat content reduced the amplitude of ultrasound signals with statistical significance (99% CI, -test). Finally, machine learning algorithms were used to enforce the ultrasound inspection. The best combination of ultrasound inspection and a machine learning algorithm achieved an 84.2% accuracy for selecting fat-rich albacore, which is better than tail-cutting (73.6%). Our findings suggested that ultrasound inspection could be a valuable and non-destructive method for estimating the fat content of albacore, achieving better accuracy than the traditional tail-cutting method.

摘要

脂肪含量是评估长鳍金枪鱼品质的主要标准。然而,对于用于评估长鳍金枪鱼脂肪含量的切尾法的准确性尚无相关报道。在此,我们通过将其与化学分析和超声检测进行比较来评估该方法。我们使用化学分析测量了长鳍金枪鱼中的实际脂肪含量,并将结果与使用切尾法获得的结果进行比较。在切尾样本中观察到脂肪含量存在显著差异(99%置信区间,t检验)。以化学分析作为基准事实,来自两家不同公司的切尾法的准确率,公司A为70.0%,公司B为51.9%。超声检测显示,脂肪含量越高,超声信号的振幅降低,具有统计学意义(99%置信区间,t检验)。最后,使用机器学习算法来强化超声检测。超声检测与机器学习算法的最佳组合在选择富含脂肪的长鳍金枪鱼时达到了84.2%的准确率,优于切尾法(73.6%)。我们的研究结果表明,超声检测可能是一种有价值的、非破坏性的估计长鳍金枪鱼脂肪含量的方法,其准确性优于传统的切尾法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec3/11639862/2a4ee1f08f3a/foods-13-03860-g0A1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验