Suppr超能文献

使用接触力感知导管进行线性消融治疗持续性心房颤动:一项前瞻性随机试验

Linear Ablation Using a Contact Force-Sensing Catheter in Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

作者信息

Lee Dae-In, Lee Kwang-No, Roh Seung-Young, Kim Yun Gi, Shim Jaemin, Choi Jong-Il, Kim Young-Hoon

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 1;13(23):7310. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237310.

Abstract

: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency catheter ablation with contact force (CF)-sensing technology has improved long-term outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation. This prospective randomized study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CF-sensing technology for additional left atrial (LA) linear ablation of persistent AF (PerAF). : After PVI, anteromitral (AM) line and roof line ablation were performed using a CF-sensing catheter. Patients were randomly assigned to either the CF-sensing (CFS) group or the CF-blind control (Blind) group. The primary endpoint was atrial arrhythmia recurrence. LA late gadolinium enhancement (LA-LGE) MRI was conducted at baseline and 1-year follow-up for long-term lesion evaluation. : A total of 62 patients with drug-refractory PerAF were enrolled (mean age: 58 ± 10 years; 77% male). The success rates of AM and roof line block were 97% and 100% in the CFS group (n = 33) and 93% and 90% in the Blind group (n = 29). The time to achieve block was reduced in the CFS group (AM: 36 ± 22 vs. 48 ± 28 min, = 0.068; roof: 19 ± 14 vs. 27 ± 15 min, = 0.031). The maximum CF for safety endpoints was significantly lower in the CFS group (AM: 42 vs. 69 g, < 0.001; roof: 33 vs. 49 g, = 0.003). Full linear LA-LGE formation on 1-year MRI did not differ significantly between the groups (AM: 17 vs. 36%; roof; 29 vs. 24%, both = NS). Kaplan-Meier estimates of AF/AT-free survival after ablation procedures were 63.6% in the CFS group and 58.6% in the Blind group (log-rank = 0.837). : In patients with PerAF, additional LA linear ablation following PVI using CF-sensing technology improved procedural safety and reduced the time needed to achieve conduction block. However, it did not significantly influence clinical outcomes or the formation of permanent full linear lesions.

摘要

使用具有接触力(CF)传感技术的射频导管消融进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)已改善了房颤患者的长期预后。这项前瞻性随机研究旨在评估CF传感技术用于持续性房颤(PerAF)患者额外左心房(LA)线性消融的有效性和安全性。:在PVI之后,使用CF传感导管进行二尖瓣前(AM)线和房顶线消融。患者被随机分配至CF传感(CFS)组或CF盲法对照组(Blind)。主要终点是房性心律失常复发。在基线和1年随访时进行LA延迟钆增强(LA-LGE)MRI以评估长期病变情况。:总共纳入62例药物难治性PerAF患者(平均年龄:58±10岁;77%为男性)。CFS组(n = 33)中AM线和房顶线阻滞的成功率分别为97%和100%,Blind组(n = 29)中分别为93%和90%。CFS组实现阻滞的时间缩短(AM:36±22 vs. 48±28分钟,P = 0.068;房顶:19±14 vs. 27±15分钟,P = 0.031)。CFS组安全终点的最大CF显著更低(AM:42 vs. 69克,P < 0.001;房顶:33 vs. 49克,P = 0.003)。两组间1年MRI上完全线性LA-LGE形成无显著差异(AM:17% vs. 36%;房顶:29% vs. 24%,均P = NS)。消融术后无房颤/房性心动过速生存的Kaplan-Meier估计值在CFS组为63.6%,在Blind组为58.6%(对数秩检验P = 0.837)。:在PerAF患者中,使用CF传感技术在PVI后进行额外的LA线性消融可提高手术安全性并减少实现传导阻滞所需的时间。然而,它并未显著影响临床结局或永久性完全线性病变的形成。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5583/11642079/161de3b688a7/jcm-13-07310-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验