Suppr超能文献

家长在公立和私立儿科诊所为窝沟封闭剂和氟化物涂漆治疗的支付意愿。

Parents' Willingness-to-Pay for Fissure Sealant and Fluoride Varnish Therapy in Public and Private Pediatric Clinics.

作者信息

Samadi Sepideh, Jadidfard Mohammad Pooyan, Tahani Bahareh

机构信息

Dental Students Research Center, Dental School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Paediatr Dent. 2025 Jul;35(4):736-747. doi: 10.1111/ipd.13285. Epub 2024 Dec 17.

Abstract

AIM

This study employed the willingness-to-pay (WTP) method to investigate parents' valuation of fissure sealant (FS) and fluoride varnish (FV) therapy.

DESIGN

This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in 2021 among 100 parents. The maximum WTP were collected using payment cards, an originally developed validated and reliable questionnaire, educational videos, and a hypothetical scenario. The data were analyzed using ANOVA, t-test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and linear regression tests (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The mean (±SD) WTP was 245 700 (±158 756.24) and 232380.0 (±166 561.71) IR Tomans for FS and FV, respectively. WTP was significantly higher among parents who visited private clinics (p < 0.05) and government employees. Both in the whole sample and in the public group, parents without supplemental insurance had lower WTP values. The WTP values elicited through the payment card method (p = 0.014) and the open-ended question (p = 0.031) for fathers with educational attainment below a high school diploma were significantly lower. There was no significant difference between the WTP values for these two therapies. Income level of the parents was the main indicator in the regression models, especially for WTP values of FS.

CONCLUSIONS

The demographic and socioeconomic conditions of parents as well as their insurance status were associated with the WTP values.

摘要

目的

本研究采用意愿支付法调查家长对窝沟封闭剂(FS)和氟漆(FV)治疗的估值。

设计

本横断面分析研究于2021年对100名家长进行。使用支付卡、最初开发的经过验证且可靠的问卷、教育视频和假设情景收集最大意愿支付值。使用方差分析、t检验、皮尔逊相关系数和线性回归检验对数据进行分析(α = 0.05)。

结果

FS和FV的平均(±标准差)意愿支付值分别为245700(±158756.24)和232380.0(±166561.71)伊朗里亚尔土曼。在去过私立诊所的家长(p < 0.05)和政府雇员中,意愿支付值显著更高。在整个样本和公共组中,没有补充保险的家长意愿支付值较低。对于高中文凭以下学历的父亲,通过支付卡方法(p = 0.014)和开放式问题(p = 0.031)得出的意愿支付值显著更低。这两种治疗的意愿支付值之间没有显著差异。家长的收入水平是回归模型中的主要指标,尤其是对于FS的意愿支付值。

结论

家长的人口统计学和社会经济状况以及他们的保险状况与意愿支付值相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验