Basu Arnab, Au Cherry, Kommalapati Ajitha, Kandala Hyndavi, Sudhaman Sumedha, Mahmood Tamara, Carson Carcia, Pajak Natalia, Dutta Punashi, Calhoun Mark, Malhotra Meenakshi, ElNaggar Adam C, Liu Minetta C, Ferguson Iii James, Peyton Charles, Rais-Bahrami Soroush, Tan Alan
O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL.
Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Dec;8:e2400667. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00667. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown promise as a biomarker for treatment response monitoring (TRM) in a variety of tumor types, with the potential to improve clinical outcomes. We evaluated ctDNA status and dynamics during surveillance and as part of TRM with clinical outcomes in both patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) treated with standard-of-care immunotherapy or targeted therapy regimens.
This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of real-world data obtained from commercial ctDNA testing (Signatera, Natera, Inc) in patients with metastatic RCC. Clinical data were collected on International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk category, pathologic subtype, and grade.
The cohort comprised 92 patients (490 plasma samples) including both clear cell and non-clear cell histological subtypes (ccRCC: 79.3%; nccRCC: 14.1%; unclassified: 6.5%). Most of the patients belonged to the IMDC intermediate-risk category (75%, 69/92). Median follow-up was 10 months (range, 4.2-25.8). ctDNA dynamics were assessed in 56 patients on treatment, and ctDNA status was analyzed in the surveillance cohort (n = 32 patients). Serial ctDNA negativity or clearance correlated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with those who became or were persistently ctDNA positive on therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 3.2; = .012). In the surveillance cohort, patients with positive ctDNA longitudinally experienced significantly inferior PFS (HR, 18; = .00026) compared with those who were serially negative.
Collectively, we show that serial ctDNA monitoring provides prognostic information for patients undergoing treatment or surveillance, and our findings demonstrate high concordance between ctDNA status/dynamics and subsequent clinical outcomes.
肿瘤信息循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)已显示出有望作为多种肿瘤类型治疗反应监测(TRM)的生物标志物,具有改善临床结局的潜力。我们评估了接受标准免疫疗法或靶向治疗方案的透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)和非透明细胞肾细胞癌(nccRCC)患者在监测期间以及作为TRM一部分时的ctDNA状态和动态变化及其临床结局。
这是一项对转移性肾细胞癌患者商业ctDNA检测(Signatera,Natera公司)获得的真实世界数据进行的多中心回顾性分析。收集了国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟(IMDC)风险类别、病理亚型和分级的临床数据。
该队列包括92例患者(490份血浆样本),包括透明细胞和非透明细胞组织学亚型(ccRCC:79.3%;nccRCC:14.1%;未分类:6.5%)。大多数患者属于IMDC中危类别(75%,69/92)。中位随访时间为10个月(范围4.2 - 25.8个月)。对56例接受治疗的患者评估了ctDNA动态变化,并在监测队列(n = 32例患者)中分析了ctDNA状态。与治疗期间ctDNA变为阳性或持续阳性的患者相比,连续ctDNA阴性或清除与无进展生存期(PFS)改善相关(风险比[HR],3.2;P = 0.012)。在监测队列中,与连续阴性的患者相比,ctDNA纵向呈阳性的患者PFS显著较差(HR,18;P = 0.00026)。
总体而言,我们表明连续ctDNA监测为接受治疗或监测的患者提供了预后信息,我们的研究结果表明ctDNA状态/动态变化与随后的临床结局高度一致。