Tan Qing-Qing, Tan Jia-Hao, Luo Chang-Kang, Lai Chun-Yan, Zhao Wei, Lan Chang-Jun, Lewis James, Aljohani Saeed, Liao Xuan, Scheiman Mitchell
Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Medical School of Ophthalmology & Optometry, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03807-w.
To compare the effectiveness of a brief binocular vision screening protocol to a comprehensive examination for detecting binocular vision anomalies before and after cataract surgery.
A comprehensive binocular vision test battery as a gold standard were administered on recruited patients before the first surgery and at the third visit after surgery on the second eye. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to illustrate the diagnostic ability of each test. In addition, a univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to further determine the contribution of each preoperative test to the prediction of pre- and post-surgical binocular vision anomalies.
Significant differences were shown for the difference in phoria from distance to near measured by the cover test (Area Under Curve [AUC] = 0.96, P < 0.01), step vergence testing of positive fusional vergence at distance (AUC = 0.71, P < 0.01) and near (AUC = 0.77, P < 0.01). The other tests did not show statistically significant differences. The ROC curve generated by combining the difference in distance and near phoria with positive fusional vergence at both distance and near demonstrated a more robust measure of diagnostic accuracy. (AUC = 0.98, P < 0.01).
Distance and near phoria difference measured by cover test has similar effectiveness as a comprehensive binocular vision testing protocol for the diagnosis of binocular vision anomalies. Distance and near positive fusional vergence measured by step vergence testing also have significant predictive value. A combination of the two tests is an outstanding screening protocol for binocular vision anomalies before cataract surgery.
The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03592615, Date of registration: July 19, 2018).
比较一种简短双眼视觉筛查方案与全面检查在白内障手术前后检测双眼视觉异常方面的有效性。
对招募的患者在首次手术前以及第二只眼睛手术后第三次就诊时进行全面的双眼视觉测试组,作为金标准。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以说明每项测试的诊断能力。此外,进行单因素逻辑回归分析以进一步确定每项术前测试对手术前后双眼视觉异常预测的贡献。
通过遮盖试验测量的远距离到近距离隐斜差异显示出显著差异(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.96,P<0.01),远距离(AUC=0.71,P<0.01)和近距离(AUC=0.77,P<0.01)正融像性聚散的阶梯式聚散度测试也显示出显著差异。其他测试未显示出统计学上的显著差异。将远距离和近距离隐斜差异与远距离和近距离正融像性聚散相结合生成的ROC曲线显示出更强的诊断准确性测量指标。(AUC=0.98,P<0.01)。
通过遮盖试验测量的远距离和近距离隐斜差异与全面的双眼视觉测试方案在诊断双眼视觉异常方面具有相似的有效性。通过阶梯式聚散度测试测量的远距离和近距离正融像性聚散也具有显著的预测价值。这两种测试的组合是白内障手术前双眼视觉异常的出色筛查方案。
该研究在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT03592615,注册日期:2018年7月19日)。