• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估腹腔镜根治性肾切除术后第1天实验室检查的必要性。

Evaluating the necessity of postoperative day 1 labs following laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN).

作者信息

Qosja Neda, Geldmaker Laura E, Fuqua Taylor, Tiwari Vartika, Malik Hanna, Wu Sarah, Haehn Daniela A, Thomas Colleen S, Hochwald Alex, Thiel David D

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):2376-2383. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-250. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

DOI:10.21037/tau-24-250
PMID:39698566
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11650348/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standard postoperative care following laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) typically includes routine blood tests. Recent studies have assessed the safety of omitting routine postoperative labs in minimally invasive surgeries to reduce hospital costs. Our primary objective was to evaluate if routine postoperative day 1 (POD1) labs were necessary following LRN.

METHODS

We evaluated 650 consecutive LRN performed by a single surgeon. Patients on dialysis or that previously had a renal transplant were excluded from the study. Our final analysis included 478 LRN. We examined POD1 labs of potassium (K), sodium (Na), and hemoglobin (Hgb) and their associations to preoperative and postoperative outcomes. Abnormal K at POD1 was defined as less than 3.5 mEq/L or greater than 5.0 mEq/L. Abnormal Na at POD1 was defined as less than 135 mEq/L or more than 145 mEq/L. Abnormal Hgb at POD1 was defined as POD1 Hgb less than 8 g/dL or POD1 Hgb 3.0 g/dL or more decrease from preoperative Hgb.

RESULTS

One or more abnormal POD1 labs were observed in 32.4% (155/478) patients. Sixty-five patients had abnormal Hgb, 57 had abnormal Na, and 53 had abnormal K. Preoperative patient factors associated with abnormal labs included older age [odds ratio (OR) 0.461; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26-0.809], higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (OR 1.671; 95% CI: 1.036-2.7), and increased intraoperative blood loss (OR 1.213; 95% CI: 1.069-1.39; all P<0.05). Intraoperative variables such as longer operative time and complications were not significantly associated with abnormal labs (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal labs on POD1 following LRN were found in 32.4% of patients. POD1 lab tests appear to be needed following LRN in older patients with more comorbidities.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜根治性肾切除术(LRN)后的标准术后护理通常包括常规血液检查。最近的研究评估了在微创手术中省略术后常规实验室检查以降低医院成本的安全性。我们的主要目标是评估LRN术后第1天(POD1)的常规实验室检查是否必要。

方法

我们评估了由一位外科医生连续进行的650例LRN。透析患者或先前接受过肾移植的患者被排除在研究之外。我们的最终分析包括478例LRN。我们检查了POD1时的钾(K)、钠(Na)和血红蛋白(Hgb)实验室检查结果及其与术前和术后结果的关联。POD1时K异常定义为低于3.5 mEq/L或高于5.0 mEq/L。POD1时Na异常定义为低于135 mEq/L或高于145 mEq/L。POD1时Hgb异常定义为POD1时Hgb低于8 g/dL或POD1时Hgb较术前Hgb降低3.0 g/dL或更多。

结果

32.4%(155/478)的患者观察到一项或多项POD1实验室检查结果异常。65例患者Hgb异常,57例患者Na异常,53例患者K异常。与实验室检查结果异常相关的术前患者因素包括年龄较大[比值比(OR)0.461;95%置信区间(CI):0.26 - 0.809]、较高的Charlson合并症指数(CCI)(OR 1.671;95% CI:1.036 - 2.7)和术中失血量增加(OR 1.213;95% CI:1.069 - 1.39;所有P<0.05)。术中变量如手术时间较长和并发症与实验室检查结果异常无显著关联(P>0.05)。

结论

LRN术后POD1时32.4%的患者实验室检查结果异常。对于合并症较多的老年患者,LRN术后似乎需要进行POD1实验室检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71f0/11650348/b98a4df4bb31/tau-13-11-2376-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71f0/11650348/b98a4df4bb31/tau-13-11-2376-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71f0/11650348/b98a4df4bb31/tau-13-11-2376-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the necessity of postoperative day 1 labs following laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN).评估腹腔镜根治性肾切除术后第1天实验室检查的必要性。
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):2376-2383. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-250. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
2
Evaluation of Routine Postoperative Labs Following Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients With Normal Preoperative Renal Function.
Urology. 2022 Feb;160:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.11.012. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
3
Single-center comparison of purely laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and open radical nephrectomy in patients at high anesthetic risk.高麻醉风险患者中单纯腹腔镜、手辅助腹腔镜及开放根治性肾切除术的单中心比较
J Endourol. 2003 Apr;17(3):161-7. doi: 10.1089/089277903321618725.
4
A Literature Review of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Radical Nephrectomy (RRN) Versus Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy (LRN) for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC).机器人辅助根治性肾切除术(RRN)与腹腔镜根治性肾切除术(LRN)治疗肾细胞癌(RCC)围手术期结局的文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Nov 19;15(11):e49077. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49077. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Examining the utility of routine perioperative hemoglobin monitoring in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy.探讨根治性肾切除术患者围手术期常规血红蛋白监测的效用。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Jun;18(6):185-189. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8603.
6
Inpatient safety trends in laparoscopic and open nephrectomy for renal tumours.腹腔镜和开放性肾切除术治疗肾肿瘤的住院患者安全性趋势。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1808-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11071.x. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
7
The operative safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic nephrectomy for T3 renal cell cancer.腹腔镜肾切除术治疗 T3 期肾细胞癌的手术安全性和肿瘤学结果。
BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(6):884-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10850.x. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
8
The relationship of postoperative complications with in-hospital outcomes and costs after renal surgery for kidney cancer.肾细胞癌患者术后并发症与住院结局和费用的关系。
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):580-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11122.x. Epub 2012 May 7.
9
Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for patients with dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease: an analysis and comparison of perioperative outcome.经腹腔腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗透析依赖的终末期肾病患者:围手术期结果的分析与比较。
Urology. 2010 Jun;75(6):1335-42. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.030. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
10
Contemporary Pure Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: Is the Transition Worth It?当代纯腹腔镜机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性肾切除术:这种转变是否值得?
J Endourol. 2021 Oct;35(10):1526-1532. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0026. Epub 2021 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Lab testing overload: a comprehensive analysis of overutilization in hospital-based settings.实验室检测过载:对医院环境中过度使用情况的全面分析。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024 Feb 8;37(2):312-316. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2023.2288788. eCollection 2024.
2
Charlson Comorbidity Index: A Critical Review of Clinimetric Properties.Charlson 共病指数:临床计量特性的批判性评价。
Psychother Psychosom. 2022;91(1):8-35. doi: 10.1159/000521288. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
3
Evaluation of Routine Postoperative Labs Following Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients With Normal Preoperative Renal Function.
Urology. 2022 Feb;160:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.11.012. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
4
Day-case robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: Feasibility and safety.日间手术机器人辅助腹腔镜手术:可行性与安全性。
Turk J Urol. 2021 Jan;47(1):30-34. doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20414. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
5
Management of Acute Kidney Injury Following Major Abdominal Surgery: A Contemporary Review.腹部大手术后急性肾损伤的管理:当代综述
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 18;9(8):2679. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082679.
6
Acute kidney injury after nephrectomy: a new nomogram to predict postoperative renal function.肾切除术后急性肾损伤:预测术后肾功能的新列线图。
BMC Nephrol. 2020 May 14;21(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01839-0.
7
Tradition Versus Value: Is There Utility in Protocolized Postoperative Laboratory Testing After Elective Colorectal Surgery?传统与价值:择期结直肠手术后术后实验室检测的协议化是否有实用价值?
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e548-e553. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003731.
8
Factors associated with prolonged length of stay following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy.
Can J Urol. 2019 Apr;26(2):9726-9732.
9
Association of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy With Perioperative Outcomes and Health Care Costs, 2003 to 2015.2003年至2015年机器人辅助与腹腔镜根治性肾切除术的围手术期结局及医疗保健成本的关联
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1561-1568. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14586.
10
Diagnosis and Treatment of Hyponatremia: Compilation of the Guidelines.低钠血症的诊断与治疗:指南汇编
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 May;28(5):1340-1349. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016101139. Epub 2017 Feb 7.