Suppr超能文献

在同一患者中比较两种用于诱发室性心动过速的程控心室刺激方案。

Comparison in the same patient of two programmed ventricular stimulation protocols to induce ventricular tachycardia.

作者信息

Brugada P, Wellens H J

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1985 Feb 1;55(4):380-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90380-7.

Abstract

In 24 consecutive patients with documented ventricular tachycardia (VT) (22 patients) or fibrillation (VF) (2 patients), results of 2 programmed ventricular stimulation protocols to initiate VT/VF were prospectively studied. Seventeen patients had VT/VF after a healed myocardial infarction (MI) and 7 patients had idiopathic VT. In both protocols (designated 1 and 2), the right ventricular (RV) apex was paced at 100 beats/min, using a maximum of 2 ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) given at twice diastolic threshold. This protocol had a sensitivity of 25%. In protocol 1, the pacing site was changed to the RV outflow tract and the previous steps were repeated; in protocol 2, the pacing rate was increased to 120 and 140 beats/min at the RV apex, also using a maximum of 2 VPCs. The next step in protocol 1 consisted of increase of current strength to 20 mA and repeating previous steps at the RV apex and RV outflow tract, with a maximum of 2 VPCs; in the next step in protocol 2, three VPCs were used during sinus rhythm and pacing was performed at rates of 100, 120 and 140 beats/min. In protocol 1, therefore, only stimulation site and current strength were changed, while in protocol 2 only pacing rate and number of VPCs were modified. Protocol 1 had a sensitivity of 54% and protocol 2 a sensitivity of 83%. The sensitivity of protocol 2 was statistically higher than that of protocol 1 (p less than 0.05). In the group of patients with VT after MI, the sensitivity was 66% for protocol 1 and 93% for protocol 2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对24例有室性心动过速(VT)(22例)或颤动(VF)(2例)记录的连续患者,前瞻性研究了两种用于诱发VT/VF的程控心室刺激方案的结果。17例患者在心肌梗死(MI)愈合后发生VT/VF,7例患者为特发性VT。在两种方案(分别指定为1和2)中,右心室(RV)心尖以100次/分钟的频率起搏,最多给予2次舒张期阈值两倍的室性早搏(VPC)。该方案的敏感性为25%。在方案1中,起搏部位改为RV流出道并重复先前步骤;在方案2中,RV心尖的起搏频率增加到120次/分钟和140次/分钟,同样最多给予2次VPC。方案1的下一步包括将电流强度增加到20 mA,并在RV心尖和RV流出道重复先前步骤,最多给予2次VPC;方案2的下一步是在窦性心律期间使用3次VPC,并分别以100次/分钟、120次/分钟和140次/分钟的频率起搏。因此,方案1仅改变刺激部位和电流强度,而方案2仅修改起搏频率和VPC数量。方案1的敏感性为54%,方案2的敏感性为83%。方案2的敏感性在统计学上高于方案1(p小于0.05)。在MI后发生VT的患者组中,方案1的敏感性为66%,方案2的敏感性为93%。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验