Zhao Hongqiong, He Wei, Xia Chunyu, Yang Zhu
Department of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing Southeast Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Mar;168(3):944-957. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15987. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
Threatened miscarriage is defined as early vaginal bleeding before 12 weeks of gestational age and can occur in any pregnancy regardless of maternal age, race, comorbidities, lifestyle, or socioeconomic status, and about one-quarter of threatened miscarriages proceed to complete miscarriage. To assess the relative effectiveness and safety of different progestogens in women with first threatened miscarriage, using a network meta-analysis. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to April 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness or safety of placebo or different progestogens for the treatment of threatened miscarriage were eligible for inclusion, including dydrogesterone (oral), progesterone (oral, vaginal, rectal), and 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone (intramuscular). A Bayesian network meta-analysis with Markov chain Monte-Carlo simulation was performed in this study. A pairwise meta-analysis was carried out by synthesizing studies that compared the same interventions using a fixed-effects model. The primary outcome was the percentage of miscarriage (defined as delivery before 24 weeks of gestation) and preterm birth (defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation), and the secondary outcomes were live birth rate, congenital abnormalities, neonatal outcomes (low birth weight <2500 g), and adverse events. The risk of bias was assessed by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. In total, 18 RCTs with six different interventions were included. Oral dydrogesterone can reduce the risk of miscarriage compared with both placebo (odds ratio [OR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.76) and vaginal progesterone (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36-0.89) in women with first threatened miscarriage. In women with first threatened miscarriage, oral progesterone also reduced the risk of miscarriage compared with placebo (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.93). However, from the available evidence, there was no statistically significant difference between progestogens and placebo in preterm birth, congenital abnormality, and live birth rate. Oral dydrogesterone was safe and better at reducing miscarriage than vaginal progesterone and placebo for women with first threatened miscarriage, and better at reducing miscarriage compared with placebo for women with threatened miscarriage.
先兆流产定义为妊娠12周前出现的早期阴道出血,可发生于任何妊娠,无论孕妇年龄、种族、合并症、生活方式或社会经济状况如何,约四分之一的先兆流产会发展为难免流产。为评估不同孕激素对首次发生先兆流产女性的相对有效性和安全性,采用网状Meta分析。从数据库建立至2023年4月,在PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行了系统检索。评估安慰剂或不同孕激素治疗先兆流产有效性或安全性的随机对照试验(RCT)符合纳入标准,包括地屈孕酮(口服)、黄体酮(口服、阴道、直肠)和17-α-羟孕酮(肌肉注射)。本研究采用贝叶斯网状Meta分析及马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗模拟。通过综合使用固定效应模型比较相同干预措施的研究进行成对Meta分析。主要结局是流产(定义为妊娠24周前分娩)和早产(定义为妊娠37周前出生)的百分比,次要结局是活产率、先天性异常、新生儿结局(低出生体重<2500g)和不良事件。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。共纳入18项RCT,涉及六种不同干预措施。对于首次发生先兆流产的女性,口服地屈孕酮与安慰剂(比值比[OR]0.5,95%置信区间[CI]0.32-0.76)和阴道黄体酮(OR 0.57,95%CI 0.36-0.89)相比,均可降低流产风险。对于首次发生先兆流产的女性,口服黄体酮与安慰剂相比也可降低流产风险(OR 0.61,95%CI 0.39-0.93)。然而,根据现有证据,孕激素与安慰剂在早产、先天性异常和活产率方面无统计学显著差异。对于首次发生先兆流产的女性,口服地屈孕酮安全且在降低流产方面优于阴道黄体酮和安慰剂,对于先兆流产女性,在降低流产方面优于安慰剂。