DiStefano Michael J, McQueen R Brett, Gao Valerie, Klein Matthew P, Snell-Bergeon Janet K, Polsky Sarit
Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2025 Apr;27(4):329-333. doi: 10.1089/dia.2024.0478. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
Data on the cost implications of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use in type 1 diabetes (T1D) pregnancies in the United States are sparse. Drawing on associations identified in real-world evidence from a retrospective chart review at the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, we conducted a cost-consequences analysis of CGM use versus self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), inclusive of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) spending. In the base-case analysis assuming per-label CGM use and per-guideline finger-stick frequency, the per-person cost was $16,254 for CGM versus $15,182 for SMBG. In a real-world scenario analysis, the per-person cost was $13,708 for CGM versus $14,524 for SMBG. In both analyses, there was a cost savings for NICU admissions of $2,903 with CGM use. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, CGM was cost saving in 25% of base-case model iterations and 46% of real-world model iterations. This study adds to the growing evidence base that the increased costs of CGM use versus SMBG to manage T1D pregnancies are likely offset by better neonatal health outcomes.
关于在美国1型糖尿病(T1D)妊娠中使用持续葡萄糖监测(CGM)的成本影响的数据很少。借鉴在芭芭拉·戴维斯糖尿病中心的回顾性图表审查的真实世界证据中确定的关联,我们对CGM使用与自我血糖监测(SMBG)进行了成本后果分析,包括新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)支出。在假设按标签使用CGM和按指南进行指尖采血频率的基础案例分析中,CGM的人均成本为16,254美元,而SMBG为15,182美元。在真实世界情景分析中,CGM的人均成本为13,708美元,而SMBG为14,524美元。在两项分析中,使用CGM使NICU入院成本节省了2,903美元。在概率敏感性分析中,CGM在25%的基础案例模型迭代和46%的真实世界模型迭代中节省了成本。这项研究增加了越来越多的证据基础,即与SMBG相比,使用CGM管理T1D妊娠增加的成本可能会被更好的新生儿健康结果所抵消。