Antony Periannan Jawahar, Saravanan Palani, Puttapasappa Manjula, Chinnaraj Geetha
Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysuru, India.
Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysuru, India.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jan;188:112194. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112194. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
Studies have reported a varied correlation strength between the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (ESRT) in cochlear implant recipients. However, there is a lack of information on the relationship between the two measures in paediatric cochlear implant users. This study was aimed to compare the ESRT and ECAP measures and determine where ECAP thresholds fall within the dynamic range of ESRT-based Maps in paediatric cochlear implant users. The study involved 40 children aged between 3 and 6 years and were implanted with MedEL cochlear implant device unilaterally. ESRT and ECAP thresholds were measured for all twelve electrodes during the same mapping session, three months after cochlear implant activation. The results revealed significant differences between ECAP and ESRT thresholds across all electrodes. A significant moderate correlation between ESRT and ECAP thresholds was observed on all electrodes. The ECAP thresholds could predict the ESRT based Most comfortable levels (MCLs) significantly. Notably, ECAP thresholds fell by 17-34 % from the upper stimulation levels of ESRT-based maps across the electrodes. This study's findings have significant implications for programming cochlear implants in paediatric patients. For children who are unable to cooperate during ESRT measurements, or in cases where ESRT cannot be elicited, ECAP measurements offer a viable alternative. ECAP-based estimates can be used to set MCL levels that closely approximate those derived from ESRT, ensuring appropriate stimulation levels for these young children using cochlear implants.
研究报告称,人工耳蜗植入者的电诱发复合动作电位(ECAP)与电诱发镫骨肌反射阈值(ESRT)之间的相关强度各不相同。然而,关于小儿人工耳蜗使用者这两种测量方法之间的关系,目前缺乏相关信息。本研究旨在比较ESRT和ECAP测量方法,并确定在小儿人工耳蜗使用者中,ECAP阈值在基于ESRT的图谱动态范围内的位置。该研究纳入了40名年龄在3至6岁之间、单侧植入MedEL人工耳蜗装置的儿童。在人工耳蜗激活三个月后的同一次调谐过程中,对所有12个电极测量了ESRT和ECAP阈值。结果显示,所有电极的ECAP和ESRT阈值之间存在显著差异。在所有电极上均观察到ESRT和ECAP阈值之间存在显著的中度相关性。ECAP阈值能够显著预测基于ESRT的最舒适水平(MCL)。值得注意的是,跨电极的ECAP阈值比基于ESRT的图谱的较高刺激水平降低了17%至34%。本研究的结果对小儿患者人工耳蜗的编程具有重要意义。对于在ESRT测量期间无法配合的儿童,或在无法引出ESRT的情况下,ECAP测量提供了一种可行的替代方法。基于ECAP的估计值可用于设置与ESRT得出的值非常接近的MCL水平,确保为这些使用人工耳蜗的幼儿提供适当的刺激水平。