Lopatin Trevor, Sakyi Kwame, Kendall Bradley, Grunberger George, Haworth Joshua
School of Health Science, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, Taylor University, Upland, IN 46989, USA.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2025 Feb;19(1):35-39. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2024.12.003. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
The three main sensory complications of Type 2 Diabetes are diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and diabetic vestibulopathy (DV). Current screening for these has been found to be insufficient, and balance testing may be a way to improve screening practices. This study aims to assess if the presence of sensory complications can be used to predict balance scores.
52 participants with T2D were recruited for this study. Participants anthropometric measures, demographic, socioeconomic, and information related to the participants T2D were recorded. Participants completed the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration in Balance (mCTSIB) and scores were recorded. Bivariate analysis was conducted on all variables related to mCTSIB total balance scores. A multivariable linear regression model was created using mCTSIB total scores as the outcome and T2D sensory complications as the predictor while controlling for sex and age.
Bivariate analysis revealed significant (p < 0.05) associations between mCTSIB total scores and T2D sensory complications, education, employment, annual income, and age. The final multivariate linear regression model was found to be significant (Adj R = 0.45, p < 0.01). This model showed that those with DPN (β = 121.03 cm, CI = 77.71-164.35, p < 0.01) or DV (β: 60.65, CI = 5.17-116.13, p = 0.04) had significantly higher balance scores compared to those that did not have a sensory complication, adjusting for sex and age.
Sensory complications of T2D have the potential to predict balance scores and provides the first evidence that balance assessments may also be able to screen for DPN and DV.
2型糖尿病的三大主要感觉并发症是糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)、糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)和糖尿病前庭病变(DV)。目前发现对这些并发症的筛查并不充分,而平衡测试可能是改善筛查方法的一种途径。本研究旨在评估感觉并发症的存在是否可用于预测平衡分数。
本研究招募了52名2型糖尿病患者。记录了参与者的人体测量指标、人口统计学、社会经济状况以及与参与者2型糖尿病相关的信息。参与者完成了改良的平衡感觉统合临床测试(mCTSIB)并记录分数。对所有与mCTSIB总平衡分数相关的变量进行了双变量分析。以mCTSIB总分数为结果变量,以2型糖尿病感觉并发症为预测变量,同时控制性别和年龄,创建了一个多变量线性回归模型。
双变量分析显示,mCTSIB总分数与2型糖尿病感觉并发症、教育程度、就业情况、年收入和年龄之间存在显著(p<0.05)关联。最终的多变量线性回归模型具有显著性(调整后R=0.45,p<0.01)。该模型显示,在调整性别和年龄后,患有DPN(β=121.03cm,CI=77.71-164.35,p<0.01)或DV(β:60.65,CI=5.17-116.13,p=0.04)的患者的平衡分数显著高于没有感觉并发症的患者。
2型糖尿病的感觉并发症有可能预测平衡分数,并提供了首个证据表明平衡评估也可能能够筛查DPN和DV。