Lo Giudice Gregorio, Brancato Claudio, Mancini Maura, Pioppo Antonino, Imburgia Aurelio
Department of Ophthalmology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy.
Department of Sense Organs, Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul;35(4):1179-1186. doi: 10.1177/11206721241306777. Epub 2024 Dec 22.
BackgroundTo evaluate intrascleral plug stability and correct centring of the IOL in three different surgical techniques using intraoperative anterior segment OCT.MethodsThis retrospective scientific study was conducted by reviewing patient records from the Ophthalmology Unit at the Civico Hospital of Palermo, covering the period between 2021 and 2022. Three distinct groups of patients, each consisting of 7 eyes from 7 individual patients, were included in this study. The first group received a quadrangular scleral flap (3.5 × 3.5 mm) that covered intrascleral plugs. The second group had two intrascleral pockets created with the insertion of plugs inside these pockets. The third group had one intrascleral pocket created to cover the intrascleral plugs. Intraoperative anterior segment (AS)-OCT was used to monitor the positioning of the plugs and the tilt of the IOL. The analyzed parameters are: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), pachymetry, macular thickness, endothelial cell loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, IOL tilting, and optic plate decentration.ResultsThe examined parameters showed uniformity among the groups. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), pachymetry, and macular thickness exhibited no significant differences between the three groups. Endothelial cell loss ranged between 10.4% and 13.1% across the patient groups. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. No IOL tilting or optic plate decentration was reported. The duration of surgeries was similar among the groups.ConclusionsThe three different scleral fixation techniques have been shown to be equally effective, demonstrating the usefulness of intraoperative AS-OCT for the stability and centring of Carlevale IOLs.
背景
使用术中眼前节光学相干断层扫描(OCT)评估三种不同手术技术中巩膜内植入物的稳定性以及人工晶状体(IOL)的正确对中情况。
方法
本回顾性科学研究通过查阅巴勒莫公民医院眼科2021年至2022年期间的患者记录进行。本研究纳入了三组不同的患者,每组由7名个体患者的7只眼睛组成。第一组接受覆盖巩膜内植入物的四边形巩膜瓣(3.5×3.5毫米)。第二组创建了两个巩膜内袋,并将植入物插入这些袋中。第三组创建了一个巩膜内袋以覆盖巩膜内植入物。术中使用眼前节(AS)-OCT监测植入物的位置和IOL的倾斜度。分析的参数包括:最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、主观验光、眼压(IOP)、角膜厚度测量、黄斑厚度、内皮细胞损失、术中及术后并发症、IOL倾斜和视盘偏心。
结果
各参数在各组间表现出一致性。三组之间术后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、主观验光、眼压(IOP)、角膜厚度测量和黄斑厚度均无显著差异。各患者组内皮细胞损失率在10.4%至13.1%之间。未报告术中或术后并发症。未报告IOL倾斜或视盘偏心。各组手术时间相似。
结论
已证明三种不同的巩膜固定技术同样有效,表明术中AS-OCT对Carlevale IOL的稳定性和对中情况具有实用性。