Suppr超能文献

了解康复之家的住院时间。

Understanding Length of Stay in Recovery Homes.

作者信息

Jason Leonard A, Bobak Ted, Light John, Stoolmiller Mike

机构信息

Professor, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.

DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Soc Work Pract Addict. 2024;24(4):406-415. doi: 10.1080/1533256X.2023.2215094. Epub 2023 May 21.

Abstract

Abstinence-specific social support within dyadic relationships is one of the best post-treatment prognostic indicators of recovery and is probably responsible for much of the effectiveness of self-help group participation. Acute treatment after-care in the form of sober-living environments-i.e., recovery houses-provides many opportunities for recovering individuals to acquire such support. However, like most recovery settings, recovery homes do not work for everyone. The current study was based on a longitudinal study of 602 Oxford House residents of which this study focused on 155 who at their first assessment, or baseline, had been in residence for 2 months or less, and we tracked them over time to see how long they remained in the recovery homes. For new residents who had only been in the recovery homes for 1/2 weeks, the ultimate rate of departure was about 40%. However, for residents with 2 weeks of time during the first assessment, the rate of departure fell to about 31%. By the time a resident had 6 weeks of residence in the recovery homes, the hazard for leaving the homes had dropped to about 25%. In conclusion, the hazard of leaving the home over time dropped off rapidly as time in residence accumulated. In addition, having an important person from the recovery home in one's social network predicted lower hazard rates, given accumulated time in residence. The study indicates that the first few weeks in recovery homes are particularly vulnerable times for residents to leave prematurely, so more efforts are needed to better understand why some residents are able to maintain residency during these critical first weeks in these settings.

摘要

二元关系中特定于戒酒的社会支持是治疗后恢复的最佳预后指标之一,可能是自助小组参与有效性的很大一部分原因。以清醒生活环境(即康复之家)形式提供的急性治疗后期护理为康复者提供了许多获得此类支持的机会。然而,与大多数康复环境一样,康复之家并非对每个人都有效。当前的研究基于对602名牛津之家居民的纵向研究,本研究聚焦于155名在首次评估或基线时入住时间为2个月或更短的居民,并随时间跟踪他们,以了解他们在康复之家中停留的时间。对于刚在康复之家住了1/2周的新居民,最终离开率约为40%。然而,对于首次评估时有2周入住时间的居民,离开率降至约31%。当居民在康复之家居住6周时,离开康复之家的风险降至约25%。总之,随着居住时间的累积,离开康复之家的风险迅速下降。此外,考虑到累积的居住时间,在社交网络中有康复之家的重要人物预示着较低的风险率。该研究表明,在康复之家的最初几周对居民来说尤其容易过早离开,因此需要更多努力来更好地理解为什么一些居民能够在这些关键的最初几周内在这些环境中维持居住。

相似文献

1
Understanding Length of Stay in Recovery Homes.
J Soc Work Pract Addict. 2024;24(4):406-415. doi: 10.1080/1533256X.2023.2215094. Epub 2023 May 21.
2
Six-month length of stay associated with better recovery outcomes among residents of sober living houses.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2023 Sep 3;49(5):675-683. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2023.2245123. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Personal and Environmental Social Capital Predictors of Relapse Following Departure from Recovery Homes.
Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2021;28(5):504-510. doi: 10.1080/09687637.2020.1856787. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
4
Person-environment interactions among residents of Oxford Houses.
Addict Res Theory. 2013;21(3). doi: 10.3109/16066359.2012.703270.
6
Motivation to maintain sobriety among residents of sober living recovery homes.
Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2015 Sep 11;6:103-11. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S89361. eCollection 2015.
7
Reasons for Leaving Sober Living Houses and Their Associations with Substance Use, Psychiatric, and Housing Outcomes.
Subst Use Misuse. 2025;60(8):1148-1156. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2025.2487992. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
8
Social Networks among Residents in Recovery Homes.
Adv Psychol Study. 2012 May 26;1(3):4-12.
9
The need for substance abuse after-care: longitudinal analysis of Oxford House.
Addict Behav. 2007 Apr;32(4):803-18. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.06.014. Epub 2006 Jul 14.
10
Recovery home networks as social capital.
J Community Psychol. 2020 Apr;48(3):645-657. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22277. Epub 2019 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The Importance of Social Support in Recovery Populations: Toward a Multilevel Understanding.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2023;41(2):222-236. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2023.2181119. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
2
Using Systems Theory to Improve Intervention Outcomes.
Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2022 Aug;53(4):415-422. doi: 10.1037/pro0000467. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
3
Dynamic Interdependence of Advice Seeking, Loaning, and Recovery Characteristics in Recovery Homes.
J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2022;32(5):663-678. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2021.1947930. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
5
Social integration in recovery living environments: A dynamic network approach.
J Community Psychol. 2022 Apr;50(3):1616-1625. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22739. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
6
Estimating the Number of Substance Use Disorder Recovery Homes in the United States.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2020;38(4):506-514. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2020.1760756. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Network measures of advice-seeking and resource sharing are related to well-being in recovery homes.
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jun;92:102970. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102970. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
8
Improving Recovery Outcomes among MSM: The Potential Role of Recovery Housing.
J Subst Use. 2019;24(2):140-146. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2018.1523966. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
9
A randomized trial of female-specific cognitive behavior therapy for alcohol dependent women.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Feb;32(1):1-15. doi: 10.1037/adb0000330. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验