• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding Length of Stay in Recovery Homes.了解康复之家的住院时间。
J Soc Work Pract Addict. 2024;24(4):406-415. doi: 10.1080/1533256X.2023.2215094. Epub 2023 May 21.
2
Six-month length of stay associated with better recovery outcomes among residents of sober living houses.居住在清醒生活屋的居民,住院时间为 6 个月与更好的康复结果相关。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2023 Sep 3;49(5):675-683. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2023.2245123. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Personal and Environmental Social Capital Predictors of Relapse Following Departure from Recovery Homes.离开康复之家后复发的个人和环境社会资本预测因素。
Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2021;28(5):504-510. doi: 10.1080/09687637.2020.1856787. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
4
Person-environment interactions among residents of Oxford Houses.牛津之家居民的人与环境互动。
Addict Res Theory. 2013;21(3). doi: 10.3109/16066359.2012.703270.
5
Exploring possible network properties facilitating recovery for residents of sober living homes.探索有助于戒酒康复之家居民康复的可能的网络特性。
Int Med (Antioch). 2021;3(4):122-128. doi: 10.5455/im.79688.
6
Motivation to maintain sobriety among residents of sober living recovery homes.戒酒康复之家居民保持清醒的动机。
Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2015 Sep 11;6:103-11. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S89361. eCollection 2015.
7
Reasons for Leaving Sober Living Houses and Their Associations with Substance Use, Psychiatric, and Housing Outcomes.离开清醒生活之家的原因及其与物质使用、精神疾病和住房结局的关联。
Subst Use Misuse. 2025;60(8):1148-1156. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2025.2487992. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
8
Social Networks among Residents in Recovery Homes.康复之家居民中的社交网络。
Adv Psychol Study. 2012 May 26;1(3):4-12.
9
The need for substance abuse after-care: longitudinal analysis of Oxford House.药物滥用后续照护的必要性:牛津之家的纵向分析
Addict Behav. 2007 Apr;32(4):803-18. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.06.014. Epub 2006 Jul 14.
10
Recovery home networks as social capital.康复家庭网络作为社会资本。
J Community Psychol. 2020 Apr;48(3):645-657. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22277. Epub 2019 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The Importance of Social Support in Recovery Populations: Toward a Multilevel Understanding.社会支持在康复群体中的重要性:迈向多层次理解
Alcohol Treat Q. 2023;41(2):222-236. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2023.2181119. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
2
Using Systems Theory to Improve Intervention Outcomes.运用系统理论改善干预效果。
Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2022 Aug;53(4):415-422. doi: 10.1037/pro0000467. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
3
Dynamic Interdependence of Advice Seeking, Loaning, and Recovery Characteristics in Recovery Homes.康复之家内寻求建议、借贷与康复特征的动态相互依存关系。
J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2022;32(5):663-678. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2021.1947930. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
4
The growth of recovery capital in clients of recovery residences in Florida, USA: a quantitative pilot study of changes in REC-CAP profile scores.美国佛罗里达州康复住所客户的康复资本增长:RECCAP 档案评分变化的定量试点研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022 Aug 6;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13011-022-00488-w.
5
Social integration in recovery living environments: A dynamic network approach.康复生活环境中的社会融合:一种动态网络方法。
J Community Psychol. 2022 Apr;50(3):1616-1625. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22739. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
6
Estimating the Number of Substance Use Disorder Recovery Homes in the United States.估算美国物质使用障碍康复之家的数量。
Alcohol Treat Q. 2020;38(4):506-514. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2020.1760756. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Network measures of advice-seeking and resource sharing are related to well-being in recovery homes.网络措施的咨询和资源共享与康复家园的幸福感相关。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jun;92:102970. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102970. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
8
Improving Recovery Outcomes among MSM: The Potential Role of Recovery Housing.改善男男性行为者的康复结果:康复之家的潜在作用。
J Subst Use. 2019;24(2):140-146. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2018.1523966. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
9
A randomized trial of female-specific cognitive behavior therapy for alcohol dependent women.一项针对酒精依赖女性的女性特定认知行为疗法的随机试验。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Feb;32(1):1-15. doi: 10.1037/adb0000330. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
Differential relationships between continuity of care practices, engagement in continuing care, and abstinence among subgroups of patients with substance use and psychiatric disorders.物质使用和精神障碍患者亚组中,连续护理实践、参与持续护理与戒断之间的差异关系。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Jul;72(4):611-21. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.611.

了解康复之家的住院时间。

Understanding Length of Stay in Recovery Homes.

作者信息

Jason Leonard A, Bobak Ted, Light John, Stoolmiller Mike

机构信息

Professor, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.

DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Soc Work Pract Addict. 2024;24(4):406-415. doi: 10.1080/1533256X.2023.2215094. Epub 2023 May 21.

DOI:10.1080/1533256X.2023.2215094
PMID:39712239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11658391/
Abstract

Abstinence-specific social support within dyadic relationships is one of the best post-treatment prognostic indicators of recovery and is probably responsible for much of the effectiveness of self-help group participation. Acute treatment after-care in the form of sober-living environments-i.e., recovery houses-provides many opportunities for recovering individuals to acquire such support. However, like most recovery settings, recovery homes do not work for everyone. The current study was based on a longitudinal study of 602 Oxford House residents of which this study focused on 155 who at their first assessment, or baseline, had been in residence for 2 months or less, and we tracked them over time to see how long they remained in the recovery homes. For new residents who had only been in the recovery homes for 1/2 weeks, the ultimate rate of departure was about 40%. However, for residents with 2 weeks of time during the first assessment, the rate of departure fell to about 31%. By the time a resident had 6 weeks of residence in the recovery homes, the hazard for leaving the homes had dropped to about 25%. In conclusion, the hazard of leaving the home over time dropped off rapidly as time in residence accumulated. In addition, having an important person from the recovery home in one's social network predicted lower hazard rates, given accumulated time in residence. The study indicates that the first few weeks in recovery homes are particularly vulnerable times for residents to leave prematurely, so more efforts are needed to better understand why some residents are able to maintain residency during these critical first weeks in these settings.

摘要

二元关系中特定于戒酒的社会支持是治疗后恢复的最佳预后指标之一,可能是自助小组参与有效性的很大一部分原因。以清醒生活环境(即康复之家)形式提供的急性治疗后期护理为康复者提供了许多获得此类支持的机会。然而,与大多数康复环境一样,康复之家并非对每个人都有效。当前的研究基于对602名牛津之家居民的纵向研究,本研究聚焦于155名在首次评估或基线时入住时间为2个月或更短的居民,并随时间跟踪他们,以了解他们在康复之家中停留的时间。对于刚在康复之家住了1/2周的新居民,最终离开率约为40%。然而,对于首次评估时有2周入住时间的居民,离开率降至约31%。当居民在康复之家居住6周时,离开康复之家的风险降至约25%。总之,随着居住时间的累积,离开康复之家的风险迅速下降。此外,考虑到累积的居住时间,在社交网络中有康复之家的重要人物预示着较低的风险率。该研究表明,在康复之家的最初几周对居民来说尤其容易过早离开,因此需要更多努力来更好地理解为什么一些居民能够在这些关键的最初几周内在这些环境中维持居住。