Rivera-Köfler Tomás, Varela-Sanz Adrián, Padrón-Cabo Alexis, Giráldez-García Manuel A, Muñoz-Pérez Iker
Performance and Health Group, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Department of Special Didactics, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain ; and.
J Strength Cond Res. 2025 Mar 1;39(3):373-385. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005033. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
Rivera-Köfler, T, Varela-Sanz, A, Padrón-Cabo, A, Giráldez-García, MA, and Muñoz-Pérez, I. Effects of polarized training vs. other training intensity distribution models on physiological variables and endurance performance in different-level endurance athletes: a scoping review. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): 373-385, 2025-This scoping review aimed to analyze the long-term effects of polarized training (POL) on key endurance physiological- and performance-related variables and to systematically compare them with other training intensity distribution (TID) models in endurance athletes of different performance levels. Four TID models were analyzed: POL, pyramidal (PYR), threshold (THR), and block (BT) training models. The literature search was performed using PubMed, SportDiscus, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Studies were selected if they met the following criteria: compared POL with any other TID model, included healthy endurance athletes, men, and/or women; reported enough information regarding the volume distribution in the different training intensity zones (i.e., zone 1, zone 2, and zone 3), assessed physiological (i.e., maximum/peak oxygen uptake, speed or power at aerobic and anaerobic thresholds, economy of movement), and performance in competition or time-trial variables. Of the 620 studies identified, 15 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. According to scientific evidence, POL and PYR models reported greater maximum oxygen uptake enhancements. Both POL and PYR models improved the speed or power associated with the aerobic threshold. By contrast, all TID models effectively improved the speed or power associated with the anaerobic threshold. Further research is needed to establish the effects of TID models on the economy of movement. All TID models were effective in enhancing competitive endurance performance, but testing protocols were quite heterogeneous. The POL and PYR models seem to be more effective in elite and world-class athletes, whereas there were no differences between TID models in lower-level athletes.
里维拉 - 科夫勒,T、巴雷拉 - 桑斯,A、帕德龙 - 卡沃,A、希拉尔代斯 - 加西亚,MA以及穆尼奥斯 - 佩雷斯,I。极化训练与其他训练强度分布模式对不同水平耐力运动员生理变量和耐力表现的影响:一项范围综述。《力量与体能研究杂志》39(3):373 - 385,2025年。本范围综述旨在分析极化训练(POL)对关键耐力生理和表现相关变量的长期影响,并在不同表现水平的耐力运动员中系统地将其与其他训练强度分布(TID)模式进行比较。分析了四种TID模式:POL、金字塔形(PYR)、阈值(THR)和块状(BT)训练模式。使用PubMed、SportDiscus、Scopus和科学网数据库进行文献检索。如果研究符合以下标准则被选中:将POL与任何其他TID模式进行比较,纳入健康的耐力运动员,包括男性和/或女性;报告了关于不同训练强度区域(即1区、2区和3区)的训练量分布的足够信息,评估了生理指标(即最大/峰值摄氧量、有氧和无氧阈值时的速度或功率、运动经济性)以及比赛或计时赛变量中的表现。在确定的620项研究中,15项符合纳入标准并被纳入本综述。根据科学证据,POL和PYR模式报告了更大的最大摄氧量提高。POL和PYR模式都提高了与有氧阈值相关的速度或功率。相比之下,所有TID模式都有效提高了与无氧阈值相关的速度或功率。需要进一步研究来确定TID模式对运动经济性的影响。所有TID模式在提高竞技耐力表现方面都有效,但测试方案差异很大。POL和PYR模式在精英和世界级运动员中似乎更有效,而在低水平运动员中TID模式之间没有差异。