Qian Yu-Mei, Zhang Xin-Yuan, Zhang Hao, Ye Rong-Rong, Zhou Li-Ying, Qi Sheng-Cai, Wang Yan
Department of Prosthodontics, Shanghai Stomatological Hospital and School of Stomatology, Fudan University. Shanghai 200001, China. E-mail:
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2024 Oct;33(5):555-560.
To evaluate the preclinical teaching effects of digital virtual simulation system applied in window-type veneer tooth preparation of undergraduate dental students.
In the early clinical exposure of five-year undergraduate students from School of Stomatology, Fudan University, Simodont virtual simulation system and conventional phantom-simulator system were alternatively used in the preclinical teaching of veneer tooth preparation. First, after theoretical training and tests of veneer tooth preparation, twenty-three students were randomly divided into two groups. Students in group of virtual simulation priority were trained using Simodont virtual simulation system, while those in group of phantom priority were trained using traditional phantom head to complete the window-type veneer tooth preparation within the specified time, followed by theoretical test again for all students. Then, the two groups of students exchanged training systems and completed the window-type veneer tooth preparation and assessment in the same time. All students were asked to fill up a teaching questionnaire for the evaluation of two training methods. The data were collected and analyzed using SPSS 21.0 software package.
The scores of veneer preparations in labial surface cutting volume, labial surface form, cervical margin design, proximal margin design using traditional phantom head training system were significantly higher than those using Simodont virtual simulation system(P<0.05). Statistical results showed that the scores of labial surface cutting volume of phantom priority group were significantly higher than those of virtual simulation priority group(P<0.05), while the scores of incisal length of virtual simulation priority group were significantly higher than those of phantom priority group(P<0.05). The results of the questionnaire showed that the majority of students believed that the traditional phantom head was more helpful than Simodont virtual simulation in identification of labial surface cutting volume, margin form, depth of indicator groove, cutting force, while Simodont virtual simulation was superior to traditional phantom head in safety and future development tendency.
It is necessary to give full consideration of the advantages and limitations of digital virtual simulation system and design reasonable teaching plans. Combined application of digital virtual simulation system and traditional phantom head should be used to improve the preclinical teaching effects of veneer tooth preparation skills for undergraduate dental students.
评估数字虚拟仿真系统应用于本科口腔医学生开窗式贴面牙体预备临床前教学的效果。
在复旦大学口腔医学院五年制本科学生临床早期接触阶段,在贴面牙体预备临床前教学中交替使用Simodont虚拟仿真系统和传统模型模拟系统。首先,在进行贴面牙体预备的理论培训和测试后,将23名学生随机分为两组。虚拟仿真优先组的学生使用Simodont虚拟仿真系统进行培训,而模型优先组的学生使用传统模型头在规定时间内完成开窗式贴面牙体预备,随后所有学生再次进行理论测试。然后,两组学生交换培训系统并在相同时间内完成开窗式贴面牙体预备及评估。所有学生均需填写教学问卷以评价两种培训方法。使用SPSS 21.0软件包收集和分析数据。
使用传统模型头培训系统在唇面切削量、唇面形态、颈缘设计、近中边缘设计方面的贴面预备得分显著高于使用Simodont虚拟仿真系统(P<0.05)。统计结果显示,模型优先组的唇面切削量得分显著高于虚拟仿真优先组(P<0.05),而虚拟仿真优先组的切缘长度得分显著高于模型优先组(P<0.05)。问卷结果显示,大多数学生认为传统模型头在唇面切削量、边缘形态、指示沟深度、切削力的识别方面比Simodont虚拟仿真更有帮助,而Simodont虚拟仿真在安全性和未来发展趋势方面优于传统模型头。
有必要充分考虑数字虚拟仿真系统的优缺点并设计合理的教学计划。应联合应用数字虚拟仿真系统和传统模型头以提高本科口腔医学生贴面牙体预备技能的临床前教学效果。