• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地震幸存者中的脓毒症预测因素:截肢与筋膜切开减压术患者的对比分析

Sepsis predictors in earthquake survivors: A comparative analysis of amputation and fasciotomy patients.

作者信息

Comoglu Mustafa, Özdemir Güzelali, Sarıkaya Baran, Acehan Fatih, Bingöl Olgun, Kilic Enver, Bahadır Batuhan, Oruc Mustafa, Demir Burak Furkan, Yılmaz Yusufcan, Sahiner Enes Seyda

机构信息

Ankara Bilkent Şehir Hastanesi İç Hastalıkları Kliniği, 06800 Çankaya, Ankara, Türkiye.

出版信息

Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2025 Jan 2;36(1):155-163. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2025.1971. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

DOI:10.52312/jdrs.2025.1971
PMID:39719913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11734847/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify predictors of sepsis in earthquake survivors who underwent either amputation or fasciotomy and to compare these two patient groups across many clinical outcomes, including sepsis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 1,608 patients who presented to our hospital following the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquakes were evaluated between February 2023 and March 2023. Of these, 138 patients (65 males, 73 females; median age: 35 years; range, 18 to 74 years) who underwent either fasciotomy or amputation were included in the study. Patients managed solely with fasciotomy were included in the fasciotomy group, while those who underwent amputation in at least one area were included in the amputation group. Sepsis predictors were investigated in this population. Additionally, the two groups were compared in terms of clinical outcomes, including bacteremia, sepsis, septic shock and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 138 earthquake survivors, 59 (42.8%) were in the amputation group, and 79 (57.2%) were in the fasciotomy group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the development of crush syndrome or the need for renal replacement therapy (p=0.781 and p=0.411, respectively). The duration of entrapment under rubble was higher in the amputation group (p=0.030). While bacteremia was more common in the amputation group, there was no significant difference in relation to sepsis (p=0.002 and p=0.106, respectively). Septic shock and mortality rates were higher in the amputation group (p=0.001 and p=0.009, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of traumatized sites (odds ratio [OR]=3.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.13-6.33, p<0.001), amputation at more than two sites (OR=4.27, 95% CI: 1.15-15.9, p=0.022), and fasciotomy at more than two sites (OR=2.71, 95% CI: 1.10-6.69, p=0.021) were significant predictors of sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing fasciotomy and amputation should be comprehensively evaluated for potential benefits and risks. Close monitoring for sepsis is particularly recommended for patients who have amputation or fasciotomy procedures at more than two sites.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定接受截肢或筋膜切开术的地震幸存者中脓毒症的预测因素,并比较这两组患者在包括脓毒症在内的许多临床结局方面的情况。

患者与方法

在这项回顾性研究中,对2023年2月6日卡赫拉曼马拉什地震后到我院就诊的1608例患者在2023年2月至2023年3月期间进行了评估。其中,138例(65例男性,73例女性;中位年龄:35岁;范围18至74岁)接受了筋膜切开术或截肢术的患者被纳入研究。仅接受筋膜切开术治疗的患者被纳入筋膜切开术组,而至少在一个部位接受截肢术的患者被纳入截肢术组。对该人群的脓毒症预测因素进行了研究。此外,还比较了两组在包括菌血症、脓毒症、感染性休克和死亡率等临床结局方面的情况。

结果

在138例地震幸存者中,59例(42.8%)在截肢术组,79例(57.2%)在筋膜切开术组。两组在挤压综合征的发生或肾脏替代治疗的需求方面无显著差异(分别为p = 0.781和p = 0.411)。截肢术组在废墟下被困的时间更长(p = 0.030)。虽然菌血症在截肢术组更常见,但在脓毒症方面无显著差异(分别为p = 0.002和p = 0.106)。截肢术组的感染性休克和死亡率更高(分别为p = 0.001和p = 0.009)。多因素分析显示,受伤部位数量(比值比[OR]=3.68,95%置信区间[CI]:2.13 - 6.33,p<0.001)、两个以上部位截肢(OR = 4.27,95% CI:1.15 - 15.9,p = 0.022)以及两个以上部位筋膜切开术(OR = 2.71,95% CI:1.10 - 6.69,p = 0.021)是脓毒症的显著预测因素。

结论

应对接受筋膜切开术和截肢术的患者进行潜在益处和风险的全面评估。对于在两个以上部位进行截肢或筋膜切开术的患者,尤其建议密切监测脓毒症。

相似文献

1
Sepsis predictors in earthquake survivors: A comparative analysis of amputation and fasciotomy patients.地震幸存者中的脓毒症预测因素:截肢与筋膜切开减压术患者的对比分析
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2025 Jan 2;36(1):155-163. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2025.1971. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
2
A Comparative Analysis of Fasciotomy Results in Children and Adults Affected by Crush-Induced Acute Kidney Injury following the Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes.地震挤压伤致急性肾损伤患儿与成人筋膜切开术效果的比较分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 3;59(9):1593. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091593.
3
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Earthquake Victims Presented to the Emergency Department with and without Crush Injury upon the 2023 Kahramanmaraş (Turkey) Earthquake.2023 年土耳其卡赫拉曼马拉什地震中,有无挤压伤的急诊科地震伤员的人口统计学和临床特征。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 Dec;38(6):707-715. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23006416. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
4
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy does not change the amputation level in patients with fasciotomy after an earthquake: Our single-center experience after 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake.高压氧治疗不会改变地震后筋膜切开术后患者的截肢水平:2023 年卡赫拉曼马拉斯地震后我们单中心的经验。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023 May 25;34(2):516-522. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1104.
5
6 February 2023, orthopedic experience in Kahramanmaraş earthquake and surgical decision in patients with crush syndrome.2023 年 2 月 6 日,在哈塔伊地震中的骨科经验和挤压综合征患者的手术决策。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 27;18(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04001-2.
6
Preventing extremity amputations after earthquakes: a quantitative analysis of fasciotomy and extrication time.预防地震后肢体截肢:筋膜切开术和脱离时间的定量分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec;49(6):2515-2520. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02325-6. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
7
The effects of timing on fasciotomy outcomes in compartment syndrome - experience from crush-induced trauma following 2023 Turkey earthquakes.时机对骨筋膜室综合征切开减压术预后的影响——来自2023年土耳其地震后挤压伤的经验
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 24;51(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02710-9.
8
2023 catastrophic Turkey earthquake: clinical outcomes of pediatric patients rescued under the rubble.2023 年土耳其灾难性地震:废墟下获救的儿科患者的临床结局。
Postgrad Med. 2024 May;136(4):430-437. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2024.2354654. Epub 2024 May 17.
9
Evaluation of the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake from the perspective of Plastic Surgery Department: A single-center experience.从整形外科学科角度评估 2023 年卡赫拉曼马拉什地震:单中心经验。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023 May 25;34(2):523-529. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1107.
10
Predictive factors for acute kidney injury and amputation in crush injuries from the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes.从卡赫拉曼马拉什地震挤压伤中预测急性肾损伤和截肢的因素。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Jul;30(7):500-509. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.06228.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative outcomes in earthquake victims with orthopedic trauma: a focus on mortality and dialysis needs.骨科创伤地震受害者的术后结局:关注死亡率和透析需求。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03015-z.

本文引用的文献

1
The initial response of a local hospital in the earthquake zone during the February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: Injuries and challenges.2023 年 2 月 6 日土耳其卡赫拉曼马拉什地震中震区当地医院的初步反应:创伤与挑战。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2023 Nov;57(6):315-321. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2023.23138.
2
Challenges Faced by Medical Rescue Teams During Disaster Response: A Systematic Review Study.灾害应对中医疗救援队伍面临的挑战:系统评价研究。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2023 Dec 7;17:e548. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2023.217.
3
Disaster planning for a surgical surge: when mass trauma threatens to overwhelm your operating rooms.
应对手术高峰的灾难预案:当大规模创伤可能使手术室不堪重负时。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2023 Nov 9;8(1):e001224. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001224. eCollection 2023.
4
The Evaluation of Different Treatment Approaches in Patients With Earthquake-Related Crush Syndrome.地震相关挤压综合征患者不同治疗方法的评估
Cureus. 2023 Oct 17;15(10):e47194. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47194. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections Following Fasciotomy in Patients With Acute Compartment Syndrome: A Study on the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake.急性筋膜间隔综合征患者筋膜切开术后手术部位感染的危险因素:关于2023年2月卡赫拉曼马拉什地震的一项研究
Cureus. 2023 Oct 11;15(10):e46880. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46880. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
6 February 2023, orthopedic experience in Kahramanmaraş earthquake and surgical decision in patients with crush syndrome.2023 年 2 月 6 日,在哈塔伊地震中的骨科经验和挤压综合征患者的手术决策。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 27;18(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04001-2.
7
Evaluation of musculoskeletal injuries after the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake: A local hospital experience.2023 年卡赫拉曼马拉什地震后肌肉骨骼损伤的评估:当地医院的经验。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023 May 25;34(2):509-515. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1100.
8
An overview of the orthopedic patient profile in the first five days following February 6th, 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake: A single-center experience in the earthquake zone.2023 年 2 月 6 日土耳其哈塔伊省地震后第 5 天内骨科患者的概况:震区单中心经验。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023 May 18;34(2):503-508. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1113.
9
Analysis of wound types and wound care methods after the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake.2023 年卡赫拉曼马拉什地震后伤口类型分析及护理方法。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023 May 18;34(2):488-496. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1128.
10
Systematic triage and treatment of earthquake victims: Our experience in a tertiary hospital after the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake.地震伤员的系统化分诊与治疗:我们在 2023 年卡赫拉曼马拉什地震后于一所三级医院的救治经验。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023 May 18;34(2):480-487. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1102.