Chen Jing, Gu Xiaowei, Wang Hong, Bian Jianliang
School Hospital Surgery, North China Electric Power University (Baoding), 071003 Baoding, Hebei, China.
Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, 071003 Baoding, Hebei, China.
Ann Ital Chir. 2024;95(6):1108-1117. doi: 10.62713/aic.3531.
With the advantage of preserving thyroid function while minimizing intervention-related morbidity, minimally invasive thermal ablation techniques such as microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have emerged as alternatives to traditional open surgery. This study compares the efficacy and safety of MWA and RFA with that of open surgery for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules by utilizing a propensity score matching study design to improve comparability.
This retrospective study included patients with benign thyroid nodules treated at the North China Electric Power University (Baoding) School Hospital between May 2020 and May 2023. Following propensity score matching, the patients were equally divided into three treatment groups: MWA, RFA, and open surgery. Data on demographic characteristics, thyroid function, treatment outcomes (including nodule size reduction, postoperative pain, cosmetics, hospital stay, and quality of life (QoL)), and postoperative complications were analyzed.
A total of 160 patients, including 55 patients who received MWA, 58 patients treated with RFA and 47 patients operated with open surgery, were initially included. Propensity score matching, aimed at minimizing baseline differences among the groups, was conducted, leaving behind 105 patients, who were equally distributed with 35 persons per group. Compared to open surgery, both MWA and RFA significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss, operation time, length of hospital stay, and pain scores (p < 0.05). The incidence of complications, such as hypothyroidism, hematoma, wound pain, and incision adhesion, was also significantly lower (p < 0.05). In addition, the MWA and RFA were superior to open surgery in terms of cosmetic satisfaction and overall QoL scores (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the MWA and RFA groups in terms of treatment efficacy, complication rates, cosmetic satisfaction, and QoL scores (p > 0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, no significant differences in thyroid function were observed among the three treatment modalities (p > 0.05).
MWA and RFA exhibit comparable outcomes, in terms of efficacy and safety, for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules, with advantages over open surgery including shorter hospital stays, lower level of postoperative pain, better cosmetic outcomes, higher QoL scores, and lower rates of certain complications.
微创热消融技术,如微波消融(MWA)和射频消融(RFA),在保留甲状腺功能的同时能将干预相关的发病率降至最低,已成为传统开放手术的替代方案。本研究采用倾向评分匹配研究设计来提高可比性,比较MWA、RFA与开放手术治疗良性甲状腺结节的疗效和安全性。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2020年5月至2023年5月期间在华北电力大学(保定)校医院接受治疗的良性甲状腺结节患者。经过倾向评分匹配后,患者被平均分为三个治疗组:MWA组、RFA组和开放手术组。分析了人口统计学特征、甲状腺功能、治疗结果(包括结节缩小情况、术后疼痛、美观度、住院时间和生活质量(QoL))以及术后并发症的数据。
最初共纳入160例患者,其中55例接受MWA治疗,58例接受RFA治疗,47例接受开放手术。进行倾向评分匹配以尽量减少组间基线差异,最终留下105例患者,每组35例。与开放手术相比,MWA和RFA均显著减少了术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间和疼痛评分(p < 0.05)。甲状腺功能减退、血肿、伤口疼痛和切口粘连等并发症的发生率也显著降低(p < 0.05)。此外,MWA和RFA在美观满意度和总体QoL评分方面优于开放手术(p < 0.05)。MWA组和RFA组在治疗效果、并发症发生率、美观满意度和QoL评分方面未观察到显著差异(p > 0.05)。在6个月的随访中,三种治疗方式在甲状腺功能方面未观察到显著差异(p > 0.05)。
MWA和RFA在治疗良性甲状腺结节的疗效和安全性方面表现相当,与开放手术相比具有优势,包括住院时间短、术后疼痛程度低、美观效果好、QoL评分高以及某些并发症发生率低。