Sezer Semih, Demirci Selim, Kara Melisa Irem, Korkmaz Murat
Health Sciences University Türkiye, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Gastroenterology, Ankara, Türkiye.
Health Sciences University Türkiye, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Internal Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Medeni Med J. 2024 Dec 27;39(4):261-267. doi: 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2024.94884.
In this study, the aim was to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of more easily applicable and cost-effective serum biomarkers, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-tolymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio (CAR), and CRP-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), instead of the endoscopic activity index (EAI) used to determine disease activation in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients.
Blood tests performed during the same period as colonoscopy were reviewed, and NLR, PLR, CAR, and CLR values were calculated. Based on the EAI score, patients with a score <4 were classified as having UC in remission, those with a score ≥4 as having active UC, and those with normal colonoscopy results as the control group.
The study included 66 patients with active UC, 31 with UC in remission, and 99 controls. The CLR and CAR values of active and remission UC patients were found to be higher compared with the control group (p<0.001), while no significant difference was found between the groups in terms of PLR and NLR values (p>0.05). The AUC calculated for CLR in diagnosing active UC was significant (p<0.001), and the best cut-off value was determined as >1,75. For CAR, the best cut-off value was calculated as >0.11.
This study demonstrated that the CLR and CAR had high sensitivity and specificity for detecting UC activity, whereas the PLR and NLR had low diagnostic value.
在本研究中,目的是评估更易于应用且成本效益更高的血清生物标志物的诊断效能,如中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)与白蛋白比值(CAR)以及CRP与淋巴细胞比值(CLR),以替代用于确定溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者疾病活动度的内镜活动指数(EAI)。
回顾了与结肠镜检查同期进行的血液检测,并计算了NLR、PLR、CAR和CLR值。根据EAI评分,评分<4的患者被分类为缓解期UC患者,评分≥4的患者被分类为活动期UC患者,结肠镜检查结果正常的患者作为对照组。
该研究纳入了66例活动期UC患者、31例缓解期UC患者和99例对照。发现活动期和缓解期UC患者的CLR和CAR值高于对照组(p<0.001),而各小组在PLR和NLR值方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。计算得出CLR诊断活动期UC的AUC具有显著性(p<0.001),最佳截断值确定为>1.75。对于CAR,最佳截断值计算为>0.11。
本研究表明,CLR和CAR对检测UC活动度具有高敏感性和特异性,而PLR和NLR的诊断价值较低。