Pestrea Catalin, Cicala Ecaterina, Enache Roxana, Rusu Marcela, Gavrilescu Radu, Vaduva Adrian, Ivascu Madalina, Ortan Florin, Pop Dana
Department of Interventional Cardiology, Brasov County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 500326 Brasov, Romania.
5th Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Diseases. 2024 Dec 10;12(12):321. doi: 10.3390/diseases12120321.
Recently published data suggested significantly lower pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) incidence with conduction system pacing (CSP). Because most data evaluated only the impact on the left ventricle, this study aimed to assess changes in echocardiographic parameters of morphology and function for all heart chambers in patients with baseline preserved and mid-range LVEF over a medium-term follow-up period after CSP. A total of 128 consecutive patients with LVEF > 40% and successful CSP for bradyarrhythmic indication were prospectively enrolled. A complete 2D echocardiographic examination was performed at baseline and the last follow-up. In total, 38 patients received His bundle pacing (HBP) and 90 received left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). The mean follow-up period was 699.2 ± 177.2 days, with 23 patients lost during this period. The ventricular pacing burden for the entire group was 97.2 ± 4.2%. Only three patients (2.9%) met the criteria for PICM. CSP led to a significant increase in LVEF (from 54.2 ± 7.9 to 56.7 ± 7.8%, = 0.01) and a significant decrease in LV diastolic (from 107.2 ± 41.8 to 91.3 ± 41.8 mL, < 0.001) and systolic (from 49.7 ± 21.4 to 39.5 ± 18.2 mL, < 0.001) volumes. There were no significant changes in E/e', mitral regurgitation, atrial volumes, and right ventricle (RV) diameter. There was a significant improvement in RV function. Tricuspid regurgitation was the only parameter that worsened. There were no differences in evolution for each echocardiographic parameter between the HBP and the LBBAP groups. HBP and LBBAP are equally protective for harmful changes in both atria and ventricles. The prevalence of PICM, defined as a decrease in LVEF, is very low with CSP.
最近发表的数据表明,传导系统起搏(CSP)导致的起搏诱导性心肌病(PICM)发病率显著降低。由于大多数数据仅评估了对左心室的影响,本研究旨在评估在中期随访期内,基线左心室射血分数(LVEF)保留和处于中等范围的患者在接受CSP后,所有心腔形态和功能的超声心动图参数变化。共有128例连续入选的LVEF>40%且因缓慢性心律失常适应症成功接受CSP的患者。在基线和最后一次随访时进行了完整的二维超声心动图检查。总共有38例患者接受希氏束起搏(HBP),90例接受左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)。平均随访期为699.2±177.2天,在此期间有23例患者失访。整个组的心室起搏负担为97.2±4.2%。只有3例患者(2.9%)符合PICM标准。CSP导致LVEF显著增加(从54.2±7.9%增至56.7±7.8%,P=0.01),左心室舒张末期容积(从107.2±41.8 mL降至91.3±41.8 mL,P<0.001)和收缩末期容积(从49.7±21.4 mL降至39.5±18.2 mL,P<0.001)显著减少。E/e'、二尖瓣反流、心房容积和右心室(RV)直径无显著变化。右心室功能有显著改善。三尖瓣反流是唯一恶化的参数。HBP组和LBBAP组之间,各超声心动图参数的变化无差异。HBP和LBBAP对心房和心室的有害变化具有同等的保护作用。定义为LVEF降低的PICM患病率在CSP时非常低。