• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于临床试验服务质量提高患者满意度:一项横断面研究。

Improving patient satisfaction based on service quality in clinical trials: A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Lee Go-Eun, Kim Sue, Chu Sang Hui, Seok Jeong-Ho, Kim So Yoon, Kim Sanghee

机构信息

College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 27;19(12):e0313340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313340. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0313340
PMID:39729511
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11676555/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Participants' satisfaction is an important factor in securing competitiveness in clinical trials. In many industries, such as healthcare, customer service quality has been analyzed to increase customer satisfaction. However, no study so far has attempted to measure participants' perceptions of service quality in the clinical trial area and identify its effect on participant satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the experiences and perceptions of clinical trial participants in terms of service quality and identified the factors that impact participant satisfaction in clinical trials.

METHODS

This study used a cross-sectional descriptive and explanatory research design. Data were collected from March 29 to May 26, 2023, via a survey. The survey was conducted with 206 adults participating in clinical trials at two hospitals in Korea. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation, and multiple linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Participants' perceptions of the service quality and their satisfaction in clinical trials were generally positive. The variables that significantly predicted participant satisfaction in clinical trials included quality of interaction with researchers, physical environment, performance results in clinical trials, changes in health status after participating in the trial, and consideration of discontinuing the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants' perception of the service quality significantly affected their satisfaction in clinical trials. Thus, all components of service quality should be considered in the overall clinical trial process to increase participants' satisfaction.

摘要

背景

参与者的满意度是确保临床试验竞争力的一个重要因素。在许多行业,如医疗保健领域,已对客户服务质量进行分析以提高客户满意度。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究试图衡量参与者对临床试验领域服务质量的看法并确定其对参与者满意度的影响。

目的

本研究考察了临床试验参与者在服务质量方面的经历和看法,并确定了影响临床试验参与者满意度的因素。

方法

本研究采用横断面描述性和解释性研究设计。于2023年3月29日至5月26日通过一项调查收集数据。该调查针对韩国两家医院参与临床试验的206名成年人开展。对收集到的数据进行描述性统计、独立样本t检验、单因素方差分析、Pearson相关性分析和多元线性回归分析。

结果

参与者对临床试验服务质量及其满意度总体呈积极态度。显著预测临床试验参与者满意度的变量包括与研究人员的互动质量、物理环境、临床试验的表现结果、参与试验后健康状况的变化以及考虑退出试验。

结论

参与者对服务质量的看法显著影响其在临床试验中的满意度。因此,在整个临床试验过程中应考虑服务质量的所有组成部分,以提高参与者的满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c5/11676555/3732454a3a94/pone.0313340.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c5/11676555/3732454a3a94/pone.0313340.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c5/11676555/3732454a3a94/pone.0313340.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving patient satisfaction based on service quality in clinical trials: A cross-sectional study.基于临床试验服务质量提高患者满意度:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 27;19(12):e0313340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313340. eCollection 2024.
2
Patient satisfaction with the quality of nursing care in critical care units and medical wards in West Bank Hospitals, Palestine: A cross-sectional study.巴勒斯坦约旦河西岸医院重症监护病房和内科病房护理质量的患者满意度:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0322804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322804. eCollection 2025.
3
A cross-sectional study assessing customers' perception, satisfaction, and attitude toward e-pharmacy services in Saudi Arabia.一项评估沙特阿拉伯客户对电子药房服务的认知、满意度和态度的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 28;24(1):1659. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12174-7.
4
Quality of medical service, patient satisfaction and loyalty with a focus on interpersonal-based medical service encounters and treatment effectiveness: a cross-sectional multicenter study of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) hospitals.以人际导向的医疗服务接触和治疗效果为重点的医疗服务质量、患者满意度和忠诚度:一项针对补充和替代医学(CAM)医院的横断面多中心研究。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Mar 28;17(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1691-6.
5
Service Quality and Patient Satisfaction of Internet Hospitals in China: Cross-Sectional Evaluation With the Service Quality Questionnaire.中国互联网医院的服务质量和患者满意度:服务质量问卷的横断面评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 8;26:e55140. doi: 10.2196/55140.
6
Mobile technologies to support healthcare provider to healthcare provider communication and management of care.支持医疗服务提供者之间沟通及护理管理的移动技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD012927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012927.pub2.
7
Level of Patient Satisfaction with Inpatient Services and Its Determinants: A Study of a Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia.患者对住院服务的满意度及其决定因素:埃塞俄比亚一家专科医院的研究。
J Environ Public Health. 2020 Aug 13;2020:2473469. doi: 10.1155/2020/2473469. eCollection 2020.
8
Patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care: evidence from a cross-sectional national exit survey of HIV and non-HIV service users in Zambia.患者满意度与感知护理质量:来自赞比亚一项针对艾滋病毒和非艾滋病毒服务使用者的全国性横断面出院调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 30;5(12):e009700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009700.
9
Customer perceived service quality, satisfaction and loyalty in Indian private healthcare.印度私立医疗保健领域的顾客感知服务质量、满意度与忠诚度
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(5):452-67. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2015-0008.
10
Gap analysis of maternity service quality and associated factors at a maternity hospital in northwest Iran: a cross-sectional survey using SERVQUAL and HEALTHQUAL questionnaires.伊朗西北部一家妇产医院的孕产妇服务质量及其相关因素的差距分析:一项使用SERVQUAL和HEALTHQUAL问卷的横断面调查
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07179-x.

本文引用的文献

1
An evaluation of the process of informed consent: views from research participants and staff.知情同意过程评估:研究参与者和工作人员的观点。
Trials. 2021 Aug 18;22(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05493-1.
2
Medical service quality, patient satisfaction and intent to revisit: Case study of public hub hospitals in the Republic of Korea.医疗服务质量、患者满意度与再就诊意愿:以韩国公立枢纽医院为例的研究
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 28;16(6):e0252241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252241. eCollection 2021.
3
Medical service quality, psychological contract, and patient loyalty: An empirical study among patients in China.
医疗服务质量、心理契约与患者忠诚度:一项针对中国患者的实证研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 25;99(48):e21079. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021079.
4
The Conceptualization of Mental Health Service Quality Assessment: Consumer Perspective.心理健康服务质量评估的概念化:消费者视角。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019 Nov;46(6):790-806. doi: 10.1007/s10488-019-00955-w.
5
Cancer Clinical Trial Patient-Participants' Perceptions about Provider Communication and Dropout Intentions.癌症临床试验患者参与者对医疗服务提供者沟通情况及退出意向的看法。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):190-200. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1618417. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
The Challenges of Informed Consent in High-Stakes, Randomized Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review.高风险随机肿瘤试验中知情同意的挑战:一项系统评价
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Mar 28;4(1):2381468319840322. doi: 10.1177/2381468319840322. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
7
Participant satisfaction with dementia prevention research: Results from Home-Based Assessment trial.参与预防痴呆症研究的满意度:基于家庭评估试验的结果。
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Nov;14(11):1397-1405. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
8
Clinical trial quality: From supervision to collaboration and beyond.临床试验质量:从监督到协作及其他
Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1_suppl):23-26. doi: 10.1177/1740774518755056.
9
Examining Provisions Related to Consent in the Revised Common Rule.审查《修订后的通用规则》中与同意有关的条款。
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jul;17(7):22-26. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1329483.
10
Assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action.评估临床试验参与者的患者满意度:行动呼吁。
Trials. 2016 Oct 6;17(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1616-6.