Shishegar Azita, Tahmasian Mahyar, Ashjaei Ali, Mirzaii-Dizgah Iraj, Samizadeh Esmaeil
AJA Universty of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 27;24(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02622-w.
Optimal selection of anastomosis technique is crucial in colectomy surgeries to ensure success and minimize postoperative complications. Various methods, both manual and stapler-assisted, are employed for intestinal anastomosis. This study aims to compare two surgical methods of intestinal anastomosis through macroscopic and microscopic examination.
Twenty-five albino Wistar rats were randomly divided into two groups: the first group (n = 10) underwent Side-to-End anastomosis, while the second group (n = 15) underwent End-to-End anastomosis. After a 5-day observation period under uniform laboratory conditions, both groups underwent a second surgery. Anastomoses were assessed for adhesion and leakage, followed by histopathological examination of excised samples using the oxygenal method. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney statistical method with a significance level of p < 0.05.
Following the initial surgery, the second group exhibited a higher mortality rate compared to the first group. Based on our data, the mortality of the rats was unrelated to the type of anastomosis or the surgical procedure. The higher mortality rate in one group was due to other factors. Additionally, the second group demonstrated significantly greater adhesion formation. Histopathological examination revealed no significant difference between the groups, although neovascularization and collagen accumulation appeared more pronounced in the Side-to-End group.
Histopathologically, Side-to-End anastomosis showed superior repair conditions compared to End-to-End anastomosis. However, due to the limited sample size, statistical significance was not achieved. Conversely, Side-to-End anastomosis was associated with increased adhesion formation. These findings suggest the need for further comprehensive studies with larger sample sizes conducted in well-equipped centers to ascertain the preferred distal colon anastomosis technique and to achieve statistically significant results that can be more reliably generalized.
在结肠切除术手术中,最佳吻合技术的选择对于确保手术成功和减少术后并发症至关重要。肠道吻合采用了多种方法,包括手工和吻合器辅助方法。本研究旨在通过宏观和微观检查比较两种肠道吻合手术方法。
将25只白化Wistar大鼠随机分为两组:第一组(n = 10)进行端侧吻合,第二组(n = 15)进行端端吻合。在统一实验室条件下观察5天后,两组均接受第二次手术。评估吻合口的粘连和渗漏情况,然后使用氧法对切除样本进行组织病理学检查。使用Mann-Whitney统计方法分析数据,显著性水平为p < 0.05。
初次手术后,第二组的死亡率高于第一组。根据我们的数据,大鼠的死亡率与吻合类型或手术操作无关。一组较高的死亡率是由其他因素导致的。此外,第二组显示出明显更多的粘连形成。组织病理学检查显示两组之间无显著差异,尽管端侧组的新生血管形成和胶原积累似乎更明显。
组织病理学上,端侧吻合显示出比端端吻合更好的修复条件。然而,由于样本量有限,未达到统计学显著性。相反,端侧吻合与粘连形成增加有关。这些发现表明需要在设备完善的中心进行更大样本量的进一步综合研究,以确定首选的远端结肠吻合技术,并获得更可靠的具有统计学显著性的结果,从而能够更可靠地推广。