Suppr超能文献

在健康人群中,ESAT6-CFP10皮肤试验与结核菌素皮肤试验相比的准确性:一项随机、盲法、平行对照的III期临床研究。

Accuracy of ESAT6-CFP10 skin test compared with tuberculin skin test in a healthy population: a randomized, blind, parallel controlled phase III clinical study.

作者信息

Ding Xiaoyan, Du Weixin, Liu Qiao, Tao Lifeng, Shao Yan, Lu Peng, Yang Huaiyu, Teng Xiaoxue, Chen Cheng, Li Zhongqi, Lu Jinbiao, Zhao Aihua, Wang Guozhi, Xu Miao, Zhu Limei

机构信息

Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, PR China.

National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, PR China.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1479. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10302-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ESAT6-CFP10 (EC) skin test in healthy population and determine the factors influencing the booster effect.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, parallel controlled trial in healthy population. The experiment was divided into two stages. In the first stage, all participants underwent T-SPOT, TB-PPD, and EC tests. In the second stage, to evaluate whether BCG vaccination affected the efficacy of skin tests, the participants with three negative results in the first stage were randomly assigned to the BCG and placebo groups at a ratio of 2:1 and underwent three tests. The positivity rates and concordance of the three tests were calculated in both stages, and a logistic regression model was constructed to determine the factors influencing the booster effect of EC in the second stage. Safety observations were continued until the skin test results were available.

RESULTS

In the first stage, 1,564 participants were enrolled in the study. The positivity rates of the T-SPOT, EC, and TB-PPD tests in all the participants were 18.89%, 10.37%, and 53.96%, respectively. The concordance between the EC and T-SPOT tests was 88.97% (kappa = 0.56), and that between the TB-PPD and T-SPOT tests was 58.19% (kappa = 0.20). In the second stage, 585 participants were assigned to the BCG or placebo group. In the BCG group, the positivity rates for the T-SPOT, EC, and TB-PPD tests were 4.76%, 7.30%, and 73.65%, respectively. The concordance between the EC and T-SPOT tests was 94.92% (kappa = 0.55), and that between the TB-PPD and T-SPOT tests was 29.84% (kappa = 0.02). In the placebo group, the positivity rates for the T-SPOT, EC, and TB-PPD tests were 6.88%, 11.88%, and 39.38%, respectively. The concordance between the EC and T-SPOT tests was 91.25% (kappa = 0.49), and that between the TB-PPD and T-SPOT tests was 66.25% (kappa = 0.17). The logistic regression model showed that age ≥ 60 years (odds ratio [OR] = 5.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.05-14.26) and retest positivity of T-SPOT test (OR = 44.87, 95% CI: 16.58-135.21) were stimulative factors of EC booster effect. Adverse reactions occurred in 168 (10.74%) and 33 participants (5.64%) in the first and second stage, respectively. Most of these were local adverse reactions, including injection site pain, pruritus, and rash.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of the EC skin test was similar to that of the T-SPOT test in the healthy population and was unaffected by BCG vaccination. The booster effects were more inclined to occur in population with retest positivity of T-SPOT or age ≥ 60 years.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT02795260, Clinical Study of Recombinant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Allergen ESAT6-CFP10 on Healthy People Aged 18-65(III-healthy), Registration Date: June 10, 2016.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估ESAT6-CFP10(EC)皮肤试验在健康人群中的诊断性能,并确定影响增强效应的因素。

方法

我们在健康人群中进行了一项随机、双盲、平行对照试验。实验分为两个阶段。在第一阶段,所有参与者均接受T-SPOT、结核菌素纯蛋白衍生物(TB-PPD)和EC试验。在第二阶段,为了评估卡介苗接种是否影响皮肤试验的效果,将第一阶段三项结果均为阴性的参与者以2:1的比例随机分配至卡介苗组和安慰剂组,并再次进行三项试验。计算两个阶段三项试验的阳性率和一致性,并构建逻辑回归模型以确定第二阶段影响EC增强效应的因素。持续进行安全性观察直至获得皮肤试验结果。

结果

在第一阶段,1564名参与者纳入研究。所有参与者中T-SPOT、EC和TB-PPD试验的阳性率分别为18.89%、10.37%和53.96%。EC与T-SPOT试验之间的一致性为88.97%(kappa = 0.56),TB-PPD与T-SPOT试验之间的一致性为58.19%(kappa = 0.20)。在第二阶段,585名参与者被分配至卡介苗组或安慰剂组。在卡介苗组中,T-SPOT、EC和TB-PPD试验的阳性率分别为4.76%、7.30%和73.65%。EC与T-SPOT试验之间的一致性为94.92%(kappa = 0.55),TB-PPD与T-SPOT试验之间的一致性为29.84%(kappa = 0.02)。在安慰剂组中,T-SPOT、EC和TB-PPD试验的阳性率分别为6.88%、11.88%和39.38%。EC与T-SPOT试验之间的一致性为91.25%(kappa = 0.49),TB-PPD与T-SPOT试验之间的一致性为66.25%(kappa = 0.17)。逻辑回归模型显示,年龄≥60岁(比值比[OR]=5.42,95%置信区间[CI]:2.05 - 14.26)和T-SPOT试验复测阳性(OR = 44.87,95%CI:16.58 - 135.21)是EC增强效应的促进因素。第一阶段和第二阶段分别有168名(10.74%)和33名参与者(5.64%)出现不良反应。这些不良反应大多为局部不良反应,包括注射部位疼痛、瘙痒和皮疹。

结论

在健康人群中,EC皮肤试验的诊断性能与T-SPOT试验相似,且不受卡介苗接种的影响。增强效应更倾向于发生在T-SPOT复测阳性或年龄≥60岁的人群中。

临床试验注册

NCT02795260,重组结核分枝杆菌变应原ESAT6-CFP10对18 - 65岁健康人群的临床研究(III - 健康),注册日期:2016年6月10日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/349a/11684250/5f1a54e51390/12879_2024_10302_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Recombinant fusion ESAT6-CFP10 immunogen as a skin test reagent for tuberculosis diagnosis: an open-label, randomized, two-centre phase 2a clinical trial.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Oct;22(10):889.e9-889.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
6
Evaluation of ESAT6-CFP10 Skin Test for Infection among Persons Living with HIV in China.
J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Apr 20;61(4):e0181622. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01816-22. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 pandemic and other factors associated with unfavorable tuberculosis treatment outcomes-Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2018-2021.
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 21;11:1247661. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1247661. eCollection 2023.
7
Tuberculosis under the Influence of COVID-19 Lockdowns: Lessons from Tehran, Iran.
mSphere. 2021 Feb 24;6(1):e00076-21. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00076-21.
8
The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the tuberculosis epidemic a modelling analysis.
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Oct 24;28:100603. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100603. eCollection 2020 Nov.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验