Kim Si-Ho, Kim Hye Mee, Chung Doo Ryeon, Ko Jae-Hoon, Huh Kyungmin, Cho Sun Young, Kang Cheol-In, Peck Kyong Ran
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, South Korea.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, South Korea.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Mar 3;80(3):738-745. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae466.
Our research aimed to investigate the potential of in vitro triple antimicrobial synergism against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) as a strategy to overcome antimicrobial resistance.
We used 12 CRPA blood isolates stocked in the Asian Bacterial Bank between 2016 and 2018. All isolates were tested by multi-locus sequencing and carbapenemase multiplex PCR. To assess the antimicrobial interactions, we performed time-kill assays using double or triple combination regimens. These regimens included CST and/or rifampin combined with IPM, MEM, or CZA. The assay was conducted at 1× and 0.5× MICs.
Among the 12 CRPA isolates, nine produced metallo-beta-lactamases (6 IMP-6, 2 VIM-2 and 1 NDM-1). In the time-kill assay, the median viable bacterial count for CST-rifampin was the lowest among double combinations after 24 h incubation (2.25 log cfu/mL at 1× MIC and 3.71 log cfu/mL at 0.5× MIC). In contrast, all triple combinations achieved 0 log cfu/mL at both 1× MIC and 0.5× MIC. Compared with CST-rifampin (synergism: 25% at 1× MIC, 42% at 0.5× MIC; bactericidal: 50% at 1× MIC, 42% at 0.5× MIC), all triple combinations showed greater synergism and bactericidal activity at both 1× MIC (50%-75% for synergism, 75%-83% for bactericidal activity) and 0.5× MIC (58%-75% for both).
Our findings suggest that CST-rifampin-based triple antimicrobial combinations exhibit greater synergy and bactericidal activity in eradicating CRPA compared with double antimicrobial combinations.
我们的研究旨在探讨体外三联抗菌协同作用对耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌(CRPA)的潜力,以此作为克服抗菌药物耐药性的一种策略。
我们使用了2016年至2018年间保存在亚洲细菌库中的12株CRPA血液分离株。所有分离株均通过多位点测序和碳青霉烯酶多重PCR进行检测。为评估抗菌相互作用,我们使用双重或三联联合方案进行了时间杀菌试验。这些方案包括CST和/或利福平与IPM、MEM或CZA联合使用。试验在1倍和0.5倍MIC浓度下进行。
在这12株CRPA分离株中,9株产生金属β-内酰胺酶(6株IMP-6、2株VIM-2和1株NDM-1)。在时间杀菌试验中,CST-利福平的中位活菌数在双重联合用药中孵育24小时后是最低的(1倍MIC时为2.25 log cfu/mL,0.5倍MIC时为3.71 log cfu/mL)。相比之下,所有三联联合用药在1倍MIC和0.5倍MIC时均达到0 log cfu/mL。与CST-利福平相比(协同作用:1倍MIC时为25%,0.5倍MIC时为42%;杀菌作用:1倍MIC时为50%,0.5倍MIC时为42%),所有三联联合用药在1倍MIC(协同作用为50%-75%,杀菌作用为75%-83%)和0.5倍MIC(两者均为58%-75%)时均表现出更大的协同作用和杀菌活性。
我们的研究结果表明,与双重抗菌联合用药相比,基于CST-利福平的三联抗菌联合用药在根除CRPA方面表现出更大的协同作用和杀菌活性。