• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

操纵检验如何干扰因果关系的推断?

How do manipulation checks interfere with the inference of causal relationships?

作者信息

Han Yuhwa, Lee Wooyeol

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Chungbuk National University, 1 Chungdae-Ro, Seowon-Gu, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28644, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 30;57(1):33. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02573-3.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02573-3
PMID:39739257
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11685263/
Abstract

This study investigates the performance of mediation analyses, including manipulation check variables, in experimental studies where manipulated psychological attributes are independent variables. We simulated the level of manipulation intensities and measurement errors of the manipulation check variable to test the validity of the analytic practice. Our results showed that when manipulation is successful and measurement error is low, mediation analyses with the manipulation check variable revealed an unstable path coefficient and standard error. Moreover, many of the detected indirect effects were inconsistent mediation situations. However, when individual differences in psychological attributes remained within the condition (low manipulation intensity) and the manipulation check variable contained low measurement error, the indirect effect indicated the validity of the manipulation. We discuss the implications of our findings for the use of manipulation checks in experimental research.

摘要

本研究调查了在以被操纵的心理属性为自变量的实验研究中,包括操纵检验变量在内的中介分析的表现。我们模拟了操纵强度水平和操纵检验变量的测量误差,以检验分析实践的有效性。我们的结果表明,当操纵成功且测量误差较低时,带有操纵检验变量的中介分析显示出不稳定的路径系数和标准误差。此外,许多检测到的间接效应是不一致的中介情况。然而,当心理属性的个体差异在条件范围内(低操纵强度)且操纵检验变量包含低测量误差时,间接效应表明操纵是有效的。我们讨论了我们的研究结果对实验研究中使用操纵检验的启示。

相似文献

1
How do manipulation checks interfere with the inference of causal relationships?操纵检验如何干扰因果关系的推断?
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 30;57(1):33. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02573-3.
2
Causal Mediation Analysis in Single Case Experimental Designs: Introduction to the Special Issue.单病例实验设计中的因果中介分析:特刊介绍。
Eval Health Prof. 2022 Mar;45(1):3-7. doi: 10.1177/01632787211073194. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
3
Mediation Analysis With Exposure-Mediator Interaction and Covariate Measurement Error Under the Additive Hazards Model.加法风险模型下具有暴露-中介交互作用和协变量测量误差的中介分析
Biom J. 2025 Feb;67(1):e70035. doi: 10.1002/bimj.70035.
4
Are Manipulation Checks Necessary?是否需要操纵检查?
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 21;9:998. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00998. eCollection 2018.
5
Statistical Mediation Analysis for Models with a Binary Mediator and a Binary Outcome: the Differences Between Causal and Traditional Mediation Analysis.具有二分类中介变量和二分类结局模型的统计中介分析:因果中介分析与传统中介分析的差异。
Prev Sci. 2023 Apr;24(3):408-418. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01308-6. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
6
Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework.两条件组内被试统计中介分析:路径分析框架。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Mar;22(1):6-27. doi: 10.1037/met0000086. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
7
Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Estimating and Testing the Mediation Effect: Structural Equation Modeling versus Path Analysis with Weighted Composites.估计和检验中介效应中的信噪比:加权综合结构方程建模与路径分析的比较。
Psychometrika. 2024 Sep;89(3):974-1006. doi: 10.1007/s11336-024-09975-4. Epub 2024 May 28.
8
Evaluating the Construct Validity of Instructional Manipulation Checks as Measures of Careless Responding to Surveys.评估作为调查中粗心作答指标的教学操作检查的结构效度。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2024 Nov;48(7-8):341-356. doi: 10.1177/01466216241284293. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
9
Clinical trials with mechanism evaluation of intervention(s): mind the power and sample size calculation.具有干预措施机制评估的临床试验:关注效能和样本量计算。
Trials. 2024 Aug 6;25(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08358-5.
10
Indirect effects in mediation analyses should not be tested for statistical significance.中介分析中的间接效应不应进行统计显著性检验。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jul;171:111393. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111393. Epub 2024 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
The trouble with triples: Examining the impact of measurement error in mediation analysis.三重问题:检验中介分析中测量误差的影响。
Genetics. 2023 May 4;224(1). doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyad045.
2
Strongly fused individuals feel viscerally responsible to self-sacrifice.强烈融合的个体感到有发自内心的自我牺牲责任感。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Oct;61(4):1067-1085. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12526. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
3
Status of immigrants' country of origin and Americans' assimilation expectations.移民原籍国的状况和美国人的同化期望。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Mar;122(3):443-468. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000370. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
4
Ambivalent Effects of Positive Contact Between Women and Men on Collective Actions for Women's Rights.男女之间积极接触对妇女权利集体行动的矛盾影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Sep;47(9):1358-1373. doi: 10.1177/0146167220974162. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
5
The impact of measurement error and omitting confounders on statistical inference of mediation effects and tools for sensitivity analysis.测量误差和遗漏混杂因素对中介效应统计推断的影响及敏感性分析工具。
Psychol Methods. 2021 Jun;26(3):327-342. doi: 10.1037/met0000345. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
6
Are Manipulation Checks Necessary?是否需要操纵检查?
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 21;9:998. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00998. eCollection 2018.
7
Distraction from emotional information reduces biased judgements.分散对情绪信息的注意力可减少偏见性判断。
Cogn Emot. 2016;30(4):638-53. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1020767. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
8
Interpretation and identification of causal mediation.因果中介的解释与识别。
Psychol Methods. 2014 Dec;19(4):459-81. doi: 10.1037/a0036434. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
9
Strength of affective reaction as a signal to think carefully.
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(2):220-35. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.904223. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
10
An alternative approach to analysis of mental states in experimental social cognition research.实验社会认知研究中分析心理状态的另一种方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Mar;46(1):215-28. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0351-0.