Liao Chen, Bai Li, He Tingting, Liang Qingle, Hu Defeng, Lei Shipeng, He Yong, Wang Yubo
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Chongqing University Jiangjin Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Cancer Med. 2025 Jan;14(1):e70542. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70542.
Uncommon EGFR mutations are a kind of heterogeneous group of mutations with various responses to EGFR-TKIs and are often excluded from most prospective clinical trials. In this real-world retrospective study, we retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy or various generations of EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy in NSCLC Chinese patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations.
We enrolled 139 NSCLC patients with non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations in this study retrospectively. Patients' clinical characteristics and the efficacy and safety of different first-line therapies were analyzed and compared.
Our data reviewed that for first-line therapy, NSCLC patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations benefited more from EGFR-TKIs compared with chemotherapy. Afatinib performed with great efficacy for the majority of non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations (N = 43, ORR = 41.86%, mPFS = 13.5 months, mOS = 20.8 months), especially in L861Q mutation (mPFS = 18.4 months). Osimertinib also demonstrated efficacy in patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations (N = 36, ORR = 27.78%, mPFS = 10.0 months, mOS = 21.0 months), especially in those without L861Q and G719X mutations (mPFS = 12.1 months). When treated with afatinib, patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations should pay attention to the management of safety, especially for gastrointestinal-related AE and rash, while osimertinib was safer.
Taking into account both efficacy and safety, afatinib and osimertinib are better choices than chemotherapy and first-generation EGFR-TKIs for NSCLC patients with non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations. L861Q showed a trend toward a better response to afatinib, while in those without L861Q and G719X mutations, osimertinib might be a better choice. Safety also should be a concern when choosing EGFR-TKI for treatment, patients should pay attention to the management of safety when using afatinib while osimertinib is safer.
罕见的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变是一组异质性突变,对EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)有不同反应,并且在大多数前瞻性临床试验中常被排除。在这项真实世界的回顾性研究中,我们回顾性比较了化疗或不同代EGFR-TKIs作为一线治疗方案,用于治疗携带非20外显子插入的罕见EGFR突变的中国非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的疗效和安全性。
我们回顾性纳入了139例携带非20外显子插入的罕见EGFR突变的NSCLC患者。分析并比较了患者的临床特征以及不同一线治疗方案的疗效和安全性。
我们的数据显示,对于一线治疗,携带非20外显子插入的罕见EGFR突变的NSCLC患者相较于化疗,从EGFR-TKIs中获益更多。阿法替尼对大多数非20外显子插入的罕见EGFR突变疗效显著(N = 43,客观缓解率[ORR] = 41.86%,中位无进展生存期[mPFS] = 13.5个月,中位总生存期[mOS] = 20.8个月),尤其是在L861Q突变患者中(mPFS = 18.4个月)。奥希替尼在携带非20外显子插入的罕见EGFR突变的患者中也显示出疗效(N = 36,ORR = 27.78%,mPFS = 10.0个月,mOS = 21.0个月),特别是在那些没有L861Q和G719X突变的患者中(mPFS = 12.1个月)。当使用阿法替尼治疗时,携带非20外显子插入的罕见EGFR突变的患者应注意安全性管理,尤其是胃肠道相关不良事件和皮疹,而奥希替尼更安全。
综合疗效和安全性考虑,对于携带非20外显子插入的罕见EGFR突变的NSCLC患者,阿法替尼和奥希替尼比化疗及第一代EGFR-TKIs是更好的选择。L861Q突变患者对阿法替尼显示出更好的反应趋势,而在没有L861Q和G719X突变的患者中,奥希替尼可能是更好的选择。选择EGFR-TKI进行治疗时也应关注安全性,使用阿法替尼时患者应注意安全性管理,而奥希替尼更安全。