Kock H, Schürer A, Staunton C A, Hanstock Helen G
Department of Endurance Sports, Institute for Applied Training Science, Leipzig, Germany.
Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Dec 17;6:1499738. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1499738. eCollection 2024.
The Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 led to disruption of sporting events, with athletes obliged to comply with national lockdown restrictions.
To investigate the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic restrictions on national-team XC skiers' annual and weekly training distribution from training diaries, results from submaximal and maximal physiological roller ski tests, and competition results from the International Ski and Snowboard Federation (FIS) world cup.
Annual and weekly training type (specific, non-specific, strength, other) and intensity distribution (TID) data were collected for 12 German XC-skiers (Tier 4/5; BM: 67 ± 7 kg; age 26 ± 3 years; 6♀: V̇O 61.3 ± 3.4 ml · kg · min; 6♂: V̇O 72.5 ± 6.2 ml · kg · min). TID was categorized using a 5-zone scale with Zones 1-2 representative of intensities below the first lactate threshold (LT1), zone 3 between LT1 and LT2, and zones 4-5 above LT2. Training data were grouped by lockdown periods in season 20/21 (L1/L2) and compared to data from the corresponding weeks in 19/20 (C1/C2). Laboratory testing was performed in the general preparation period prior to competition for both seasons. Differences between seasons (C1/C2 vs. L1/L2) in training and performance variables were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA and linear mixed models.
Total annual training duration increased by 9% during 20/21 (928 ± 79 h · year) compared to 19/20 (852 ± 73 h · year). During L1, skiers achieved a greater weekly training duration (mean differences (Δ: 7.7 h · week) compared to C1, due to an increase in non-specific training (Δ: 7.0 h · week), whereas L2 resulted in greater weekly training compared with C2 due to a higher specific endurance training volume (Δ: 1.4 h · week). In 20/21 skiers performed a higher volume of Zone 1 (Δ: 149 h · year). Laboratory test- and FIS racing performance improved from 19/20 to 20/21.
German XC skiers' training characteristics, laboratory- and racing performance were significantly different between the two seasons. In fact, training duration as well as laboratory- and racing performance increased from 19/20 to 20/21. In spite of seasonal variation in performance and training within an Olympic cycle these findings might suggest that skiers adapted their training effectively to pandemic constraints, ultimately enhancing performance outcomes.
2020年的新冠疫情导致体育赛事中断,运动员不得不遵守国家封锁限制。
通过训练日记、次最大强度和最大强度生理滑轮滑雪测试结果以及国际滑雪和单板滑雪联合会(FIS)世界杯比赛成绩,调查新冠疫情限制措施对国家队越野滑雪运动员年度和每周训练安排的影响。
收集了12名德国越野滑雪运动员(4/5级;体重:67±7千克;年龄:26±3岁;6名女性:摄氧量61.3±3.4毫升·千克·分钟;6名男性:摄氧量72.5±6.2毫升·千克·分钟)的年度和每周训练类型(专项、非专项、力量、其他)及强度分布(训练强度分布,TID)数据。TID使用5个区域的量表进行分类,1-2区代表低于第一乳酸阈值(LT1)的强度,3区在LT1和LT2之间,4-5区高于LT2。训练数据按20/21赛季的封锁期(L1/L2)进行分组,并与19/20赛季相应周的数据(C1/C2)进行比较。两个赛季在比赛前的一般准备期都进行了实验室测试。使用重复测量方差分析和线性混合模型分析赛季间(C1/C2与L1/L2)训练和表现变量的差异。
与19/20赛季(852±73小时·年)相比,20/21赛季的年度总训练时长增加了9%(928±79小时·年)。在L1期间,由于非专项训练增加(差值:7.0小时·周),滑雪运动员的每周训练时长比C1更长(平均差值(Δ):7.7小时·周),而L2期间,由于专项耐力训练量更高(差值:1.4小时·周),每周训练量比C2更大。在20/21赛季,滑雪运动员在1区的训练量更高(差值:149小时·年)。从19/20赛季到20/21赛季,实验室测试成绩和FIS比赛成绩有所提高。
两个赛季德国越野滑雪运动员的训练特点、实验室测试成绩和比赛成绩存在显著差异。事实上,从19/20赛季到20/21赛季,训练时长以及实验室测试成绩和比赛成绩都有所提高。尽管在奥运周期内表现和训练存在季节性变化,但这些发现可能表明滑雪运动员有效地调整了训练以适应疫情限制,最终提高了成绩。