Grenell Amanda, Ernst Jasmine R, Carlson Stephanie M
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University.
Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities.
Early Educ Dev. 2024;35(8):1891-1919. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2024.2360884. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
Early science skills predict later science achievement, and persistent achievement gaps in science appear as early as preschool. The current study compared the effectiveness of different instructional approaches for teaching preschoolers about sinking and floating and examined individual differences in learning. Participants were typically developing 4-5-year-olds (=93; 47% female). Children were randomly assigned to an Explicit Instruction, Discovery Learning, or No-Instruction Control condition. A pre-post-test design was used to measure change in children's knowledge of sinking and floating using an assessment created for the current study. Participants also completed measures of executive function (i.e., Minnesota Executive Function Scale, Statue Task, Backward Word Span) and non-verbal and verbal IQ (i.e., Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales). Results showed that children in the Explicit Instruction condition learned more than children in the other two groups. Additionally, individual differences in age, socioeconomic status, IQ, and executive function predicted learning, although only age and SES were uniquely predictive when all variables were included in the model. Lastly, children's sinking and floating pre-test scores significantly interacted with instructional condition to predict learning. Among children in the Discovery Learning condition, those with more prior knowledge gained more after instruction than children with less prior knowledge.
These findings highlight the importance of considering how learner characteristics might influence the effectiveness of different instructional approaches.
早期科学技能能够预测后期的科学成就,并且科学领域中持续存在的成就差距早在学前阶段就已出现。本研究比较了不同教学方法在教授学龄前儿童关于沉浮知识方面的有效性,并考察了学习中的个体差异。参与者为发育正常的4至5岁儿童(=93名;47%为女性)。儿童被随机分配到明确指导、发现学习或无指导控制组。采用前后测设计,使用为本研究编制的评估工具来测量儿童在沉浮知识方面的变化。参与者还完成了执行功能测量(即明尼苏达执行功能量表、雕像任务、倒序单词广度)以及非言语和言语智商测量(即斯坦福-比奈智力量表)。结果显示,接受明确指导的儿童比其他两组儿童学到的更多。此外,年龄、社会经济地位、智商和执行功能方面的个体差异能够预测学习情况,不过当模型中纳入所有变量时,只有年龄和社会经济地位具有独特的预测作用。最后,儿童的沉浮前测分数与教学条件存在显著交互作用,以此来预测学习情况。在发现学习组的儿童中,那些已有知识较多的儿童在接受指导后比已有知识较少的儿童收获更多。
这些发现凸显了考虑学习者特征如何可能影响不同教学方法有效性的重要性。