Roson Rodriguez Pablo, Chen Xiao, Arancibia Marcelo, Madrid Eva, Shokraneh Farhad, Adams Clive E, Franco Juan Víctor Ariel
Research Department, Cochrane Argentina Associate Centre-Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Minerva Schools at Keck Graduate Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Nurs Open. 2025 Jan;12(1):e70100. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70100.
This review aims to classify the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on mental health services (MHS) for people with serious mental illness (SMI) available in the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's (CSzG) specialised register.
Scoping review.
We retrieved and screened RCTs of service-level interventions considering non-pharmacological approaches for mental healthcare of the CSzG register. We classified and collected the main characteristics of the RCTs using a customised data extraction and charting form based on DESDE-LTS classification.
We included 233 out of 262 total trial registries. Most of the studies were conducted in China, 136 (58%), 57 (24%) North America and 26 (11%) Europe. We classified the studies as ambulatory assistance 80 (34%), day services/out-patient care 38 (16%), residential services 44 (19%), accessibility to care 19 (8%), information/assessment 39 (17%), self-help and voluntary help 10 (4%), e-health 52 (22%), and discharge services 17 (7%).
We found a large number of trials that investigated the effects of mental health services for people with SMI. Trials classification was difficult due to the poor report of the characteristics of these complex interventions. This database can be used to plan and prioritise systematic reviews according to the needs of stakeholders.
The study is of interest to mental health nursing because it studies the different services in which nurses play a fundamental role with implications in the nursing practice, education, research or leadership and management.
本综述旨在对Cochrane精神分裂症研究组(CSzG)专门注册库中有关严重精神疾病(SMI)患者心理健康服务(MHS)的随机对照试验(RCT)证据进行分类。
范围综述。
我们检索并筛选了CSzG注册库中考虑精神卫生保健非药物方法的服务层面干预的随机对照试验。我们使用基于DESDE-LTS分类的定制数据提取和图表形式对随机对照试验的主要特征进行分类和收集。
我们从262个试验注册库中纳入了233个。大多数研究在中国进行,有136项(58%),北美有57项(24%),欧洲有26项(11%)。我们将这些研究分类为门诊援助80项(34%)、日间服务/门诊护理38项(16%)、住院服务44项(19%)、就医便利性19项(8%)、信息/评估39项(17%)、自助和志愿帮助10项(4%)、电子健康52项(22%)以及出院服务17项(7%)。
我们发现大量研究调查了针对严重精神疾病患者的心理健康服务效果。由于这些复杂干预措施特征的报告不佳,试验分类存在困难。该数据库可用于根据利益相关者的需求规划和确定系统评价的优先级。
该研究对精神卫生护理具有重要意义,因为它研究了护士在其中发挥重要作用的不同服务,对护理实践、教育、研究或领导与管理都有影响。