• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The role of empiric atypical antibiotic coverage in non-severe community-acquired pneumonia.经验性使用非典型抗生素在非重症社区获得性肺炎中的作用。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 11;4(1):e214. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.453. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of Empiric Antibiotic Treatment Regimens for Hospitalized, Non-severe Community-acquired Pneumonia: A Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study.住院非重症社区获得性肺炎经验性抗生素治疗方案的比较:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2024 Apr;46(4):338-344. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
3
Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults.住院成人社区获得性肺炎非典型病原体的经验性抗生素覆盖。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD004418. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004418.pub4.
4
Clinical failure with and without empiric atypical bacteria coverage in hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.社区获得性肺炎住院成人患者接受与未接受经验性非典型细菌覆盖时的临床失败情况:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2495-5.
5
Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults.住院成人社区获得性肺炎非典型病原体的经验性抗生素覆盖
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD004418. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004418.pub3.
6
Comparative Efficacy of Beta-Lactams and Macrolides in the Treatment of Pediatric Pneumonia: A Systematic Review.β-内酰胺类和大环内酯类药物治疗儿童肺炎的疗效比较:系统评价。
Curr Pediatr Rev. 2020;16(4):307-313. doi: 10.2174/1573396316666200907115800.
7
How good is the evidence for the recommended empirical antimicrobial treatment of patients hospitalized because of community-acquired pneumonia? A systematic review.对于因社区获得性肺炎住院患者推荐的经验性抗菌治疗,其证据质量如何?一项系统评价。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Oct;52(4):555-63. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg413. Epub 2003 Sep 12.
8
Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults.住院成人社区获得性肺炎非典型病原体的经验性抗生素覆盖范围。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD004418. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004418.pub2.
9
Effect of β-Lactam Plus Macrolide Versus Fluoroquinolone on 30-Day Readmissions for Community-Acquired Pneumonia.β-内酰胺类联合大环内酯类与氟喹诺酮类药物对社区获得性肺炎 30 天再入院的影响。
Am J Ther. 2020 Mar/Apr;27(2):e177-e182. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000788.
10
Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy in Patients Hospitalized with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎住院患者的单药治疗与联合治疗
Treat Respir Med. 2006;5(6):371-83. doi: 10.2165/00151829-200605060-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
The elusive concept of appropriate antibiotic for septic patients when a pathogen is not detected by standard culture methods.当标准培养方法未检测到病原体时,针对脓毒症患者使用合适抗生素这一难以捉摸的概念。
Crit Care. 2025 Jan 6;29(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05240-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Inappropriate Diagnosis of Pneumonia Among Hospitalized Adults.住院成人中肺炎的不当诊断。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 May 1;184(5):548-556. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0077.
2
Clarithromycin for early anti-inflammatory responses in community-acquired pneumonia in Greece (ACCESS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.克拉霉素治疗希腊社区获得性肺炎的早期抗炎反应(ACCESS):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2024 Apr;12(4):294-304. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00412-5. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
3
Hydrocortisone in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia.严重社区获得性肺炎的氢化可的松治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2023 May 25;388(21):1931-1941. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2215145. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
4
A Multicenter Evaluation of Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance Among Isolates From Adults in the United States.美国成年人分离株中抗菌药物耐药性趋势的多中心评估
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 2;9(9):ofac420. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac420. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Global Trends in the Proportion of Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.全球大环内酯类耐药肺炎支原体感染比例的趋势:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2220949. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20949.
6
Overdiagnosis of urinary tract infection linked to overdiagnosis of pneumonia: a multihospital cohort study.尿路感染的过度诊断与肺炎的过度诊断有关:一项多医院队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 May;31(5):383-386. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013565. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
7
Estimating daily antibiotic harms: an umbrella review with individual study meta-analysis.估算每日抗生素危害:一项个体研究荟萃分析的伞式综述。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Apr;28(4):479-490. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.10.022. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
8
A Multicenter Evaluation of the US Prevalence and Regional Variation in Macrolide-Resistant in Ambulatory and Hospitalized Adult Patients in the United States.美国门诊和住院成年患者中耐大环内酯类药物的患病率及地区差异的多中心评估
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 4;8(7):ofab063. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab063. eCollection 2021 Jul.
9
Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Adults: A Consensus Statement Regarding Initial Strategies.免疫功能低下成人社区获得性肺炎的治疗:初始策略的共识声明。
Chest. 2020 Nov;158(5):1896-1911. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.598. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
10
Molecular Testing for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections: Clinical and Diagnostic Recommendations From the IDSA's Diagnostics Committee.急性呼吸道感染的分子检测:来自 IDSA 诊断委员会的临床和诊断建议。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):2744-2751. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa508.

经验性使用非典型抗生素在非重症社区获得性肺炎中的作用。

The role of empiric atypical antibiotic coverage in non-severe community-acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Hartlage Whitney, Imlay Hannah, Spivak Emily S

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Veteran's Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 11;4(1):e214. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.453. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1017/ash.2024.453
PMID:39758879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11696604/
Abstract

A β-lactam plus a macrolide or a respiratory fluoroquinolone alone is recommended as standard empiric antibacterial therapy for non-severe adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) per Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. However, the evidence in support of adding empiric atypical antibacterial therapy, and specifically the addition of a macrolide, is conflicting and should be balanced with additional factors: the necessity of covering atypical organisms, benefits of macrolide-associated immunomodulation, harms associated with antibiotic use, and selection for antibiotic-resistant organisms. In this review, we examine the role of atypical coverage in standard treatment regimens for patients admitted with non-severe CAP and specifically focus on the addition of macrolides to β-lactams. We conclude that a subset of patients should not be given atypical coverage as part of their regimen.

摘要

根据美国传染病学会的指南,对于因社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院的非重症成人患者,推荐使用β-内酰胺类药物加用大环内酯类药物或单独使用呼吸喹诺酮类药物作为标准经验性抗菌治疗。然而,支持添加经验性非典型抗菌治疗,特别是添加大环内酯类药物的证据存在矛盾,应与其他因素相权衡:覆盖非典型病原体的必要性、大环内酯类药物相关免疫调节的益处、抗生素使用的危害以及对抗生素耐药菌的选择。在本综述中,我们研究了非典型病原体覆盖在非重症CAP患者标准治疗方案中的作用,并特别关注在β-内酰胺类药物中添加大环内酯类药物的情况。我们得出结论,一部分患者不应在其治疗方案中接受非典型病原体覆盖。