Hartlage Whitney, Imlay Hannah, Spivak Emily S
Division of Infectious Diseases, Veteran's Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 11;4(1):e214. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.453. eCollection 2024.
A β-lactam plus a macrolide or a respiratory fluoroquinolone alone is recommended as standard empiric antibacterial therapy for non-severe adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) per Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. However, the evidence in support of adding empiric atypical antibacterial therapy, and specifically the addition of a macrolide, is conflicting and should be balanced with additional factors: the necessity of covering atypical organisms, benefits of macrolide-associated immunomodulation, harms associated with antibiotic use, and selection for antibiotic-resistant organisms. In this review, we examine the role of atypical coverage in standard treatment regimens for patients admitted with non-severe CAP and specifically focus on the addition of macrolides to β-lactams. We conclude that a subset of patients should not be given atypical coverage as part of their regimen.
根据美国传染病学会的指南,对于因社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院的非重症成人患者,推荐使用β-内酰胺类药物加用大环内酯类药物或单独使用呼吸喹诺酮类药物作为标准经验性抗菌治疗。然而,支持添加经验性非典型抗菌治疗,特别是添加大环内酯类药物的证据存在矛盾,应与其他因素相权衡:覆盖非典型病原体的必要性、大环内酯类药物相关免疫调节的益处、抗生素使用的危害以及对抗生素耐药菌的选择。在本综述中,我们研究了非典型病原体覆盖在非重症CAP患者标准治疗方案中的作用,并特别关注在β-内酰胺类药物中添加大环内酯类药物的情况。我们得出结论,一部分患者不应在其治疗方案中接受非典型病原体覆盖。