MacLeod Clara, Davies Katherine, Mwenge Mwamba M, Chipungu Jenala, Cumming Oliver, Dreibelbis Robert
Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2025 Mar;264:114519. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2025.114519. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
Behaviour change interventions have the potential to improve sanitation and hygiene practices in urban settings. However, evidence on which behaviour change interventions have successfully improved sanitation and hygiene practices in urban settings is unclear.
We performed electronic searches across five databases and one grey literature database to identify relevant studies published between January 1, 1990 and November 20, 2023 in English. Eligible study designs included randomised and non-randomised controlled trials with a concurrent control. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported a behaviour change intervention for improving sanitation and/or hygiene practices in an urban setting. Individual behaviour change intervention components were mapped to one of nine intervention functions of the capabilities, opportunities, motivations, and behaviour (COM-B) framework. Risk of bias was assessed for each study using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
After de-duplication, 8249 documents were screened by abstract and title, with 79 documents retrieved for full-text screening. We included 13 studies ranging from low- to high-quality. The behaviour change interventions had mixed effects on sanitation and hygiene practices in urban settings. Specifically, interventions improved latrine quality but not safe child faeces disposal. Interventions often improved handwashing with soap at key times and sometimes increased the presence of soap and water at the handwashing facility, used as a proxy measure for handwashing. There is limited evidence on food hygiene practices. Most behavioural outcomes were measured between 6 and 12 months after intervention implementation, which may undermine the sustainability of behaviour change interventions.
Despite overall mixed behavioural effects on sanitation and hygiene practices, behaviour change interventions can improve certain behaviours in urban settings, such as latrine quality improvements and handwashing with soap at the household or compound level. More ambitious behaviour change interventions are needed to reduce disparities in sanitation and hygiene access in urban areas globally.
行为改变干预措施有潜力改善城市环境中的卫生设施和卫生习惯。然而,关于哪些行为改变干预措施成功改善了城市环境中的卫生设施和卫生习惯的证据尚不清楚。
我们在五个数据库和一个灰色文献数据库中进行了电子检索,以识别1990年1月1日至2023年11月20日期间以英文发表的相关研究。符合条件的研究设计包括有同期对照的随机和非随机对照试验。如果研究报告了旨在改善城市环境中卫生设施和/或卫生习惯的行为改变干预措施,则有资格纳入。个体行为改变干预组成部分被映射到能力、机会、动机和行为(COM-B)框架的九个干预功能之一。使用改编后的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对每项研究的偏倚风险进行评估。
在去除重复项后,通过摘要和标题筛选了8249篇文献,检索到79篇文献进行全文筛选。我们纳入了13项质量从低到高的研究。行为改变干预措施对城市环境中的卫生设施和卫生习惯有不同的影响。具体而言,干预措施改善了厕所质量,但未改善儿童安全粪便处理情况。干预措施通常在关键时间改善了用肥皂洗手的情况,有时还增加了洗手设施处肥皂和水的供应,以此作为洗手的替代指标。关于食品卫生习惯的证据有限。大多数行为结果是在干预实施后6至12个月测量的,这可能会削弱行为改变干预措施的可持续性。
尽管行为改变干预措施对卫生设施和卫生习惯的总体行为影响不一,但在城市环境中,行为改变干预措施可以改善某些行为,如改善厕所质量以及在家庭或大院层面用肥皂洗手。需要更具雄心的行为改变干预措施来减少全球城市地区在卫生设施和卫生服务获取方面的差距。