Suppr超能文献

肌内效贴布能否替代腕管综合征患者的静态手腕矫形器?一项随机临床试验。

Is Kinesiotaping an alternative to static wrist orthosis in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome? A randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

İnceboy Didem, Aytekin Ebru, Oğuz Muhammed, Dede Burak Tayyip, Bulut Gül Tuğba, Pekin Doğan Yasemin

机构信息

Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey.

Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Hand Ther. 2025 Jul-Sep;38(3):418-426. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2024.08.002. Epub 2025 Jan 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper extremity. Conservative treatments are effective for treating mild and moderate CTS. There is still a need for studies to investigate the superiority of conservative treatments over each other.

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of orthosis treatment and Kinesio taping (KT) treatment on pain, functional status, and grip strength in patients with idiopathic CTS.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Sixty patients (90% women) who were diagnosed with mild or moderate CTS by electroneuromyography were included in this study. Patients were randomized into two groups: the orthosis and KT groups. Hand grip, and three-point pinch strength measuring with a dynamometer and a pinch meter, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ), Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale (LANSS), and Short Form-36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) were used in clinical assessment. Clinical evaluations were made baseline and at the end of 4 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Both KT and static wrist orthosis were found to be effective on SF-36 pain, VAS rest, VAS activity, LANSS, grip strength, three-point pinch strength, BCTQ symptom, and functional scores. The changes in VAS activity (between-group mean difference [MD] = -0.93; CI = -1.83:-0.03; p < 0.05; d = 1.74), BCTQ function scores (MD = -2.60; CI = -5.39:0.19; p < 0.05, d = 5.40), and SF-36 mental health scores (MD = 5.87; CI = 1.15:10.59; p < 0.05; d = 9.13) were significantly higher in the KT group compared to the orthosis group.

CONCLUSIONS

KT, which is a straightforward and safe treatment that does not restrict daily activities, may offer a beneficial alternative to restrictive and uncomfortable orthosis therapy for treating mild to moderate CTS in those leading active daily lives.

摘要

背景

腕管综合征(CTS)是上肢最常见的卡压性神经病变。保守治疗对轻、中度CTS有效。仍有必要开展研究以调查不同保守治疗方法之间的优势。

目的

本研究旨在比较矫形器治疗和肌内效贴布(KT)治疗对特发性CTS患者疼痛、功能状态和握力的疗效。

研究设计

随机临床试验。

方法

本研究纳入了60例经肌电图诊断为轻、中度CTS的患者(90%为女性)。患者被随机分为两组:矫形器组和KT组。使用握力计和捏力计测量握力和三点捏力,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、波士顿腕管综合征问卷(BCTQ)、利兹神经病理性症状和体征疼痛量表(LANSS)以及简短健康调查问卷(SF-36)进行临床评估。在基线和治疗4周结束时进行临床评估。

结果

发现KT和静态腕部矫形器对SF-36疼痛、VAS静息痛、VAS活动痛、LANSS、握力、三点捏力、BCTQ症状和功能评分均有效。与矫形器组相比,KT组在VAS活动痛(组间平均差值[MD]=-0.93;可信区间[CI]=-1.83:-0.03;p<0.05;d=1.74)、BCTQ功能评分(MD=-2.60;CI=-5.39:0.19;p<0.05,d=5.40)和SF-36心理健康评分(MD=5.87;CI=1.15:10.59;p<0.05;d=9.13)方面的变化显著更高。

结论

KT是一种简单且安全的治疗方法,不限制日常活动,对于日常活动活跃的轻至中度CTS患者,可能是一种比限制性且不舒适的矫形器治疗更有益的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验