• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国和英语国家动物园游客行为准则的比较分析

Comparative Analysis of Visitor Codes of Conduct in Chinese and Anglophone Zoos.

作者信息

Guo Yulei, Fennell David

机构信息

Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu 610081, China.

Geography and Tourism Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 17;14(24):3647. doi: 10.3390/ani14243647.

DOI:10.3390/ani14243647
PMID:39765552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11672447/
Abstract

Zoos worldwide use codes of conduct to regulate visitor behavior. Despite their global popularity, the ethical management of zoo visitors remains an underexplored area of research. This study analyzes 899 statements from 27 Chinese zoos and 22 zoos in predominantly English-speaking countries, uncovering significant cross-cultural similarities in the structure and content of these codes. The findings reveal that a deontological approach currently dominates, emphasizing the rule-based regulation of visitor behavior. However, this study highlights the potential to expand the scope of these codes by integrating animal welfare principles and conservation education to foster greater awareness and engagement. Furthermore, adopting teleological and context-sensitive approaches in designing these codes could enhance visitor involvement and support more effective zoo management.

摘要

全球各地的动物园都使用行为准则来规范游客行为。尽管动物园在全球广受欢迎,但对动物园游客的道德管理仍是一个未得到充分探索的研究领域。本研究分析了来自27家中国动物园和22家主要英语国家动物园的899条声明,发现这些准则在结构和内容上存在显著的跨文化相似性。研究结果表明,目前一种义务论方法占主导地位,强调对游客行为进行基于规则的规范。然而,本研究强调了通过整合动物福利原则和保护教育来扩大这些准则范围的潜力,以提高人们的意识和参与度。此外,在设计这些准则时采用目的论和因地制宜的方法可以增强游客的参与度,并支持更有效的动物园管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1553/11672447/6009fe32a4f5/animals-14-03647-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1553/11672447/347500123903/animals-14-03647-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1553/11672447/b72dee51ae00/animals-14-03647-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1553/11672447/6009fe32a4f5/animals-14-03647-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1553/11672447/347500123903/animals-14-03647-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1553/11672447/b72dee51ae00/animals-14-03647-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1553/11672447/6009fe32a4f5/animals-14-03647-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Visitor Codes of Conduct in Chinese and Anglophone Zoos.中国和英语国家动物园游客行为准则的比较分析
Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 17;14(24):3647. doi: 10.3390/ani14243647.
2
Visitor Attitudes Toward Little Penguins () at Two Australian Zoos.游客对澳大利亚两家动物园里小企鹅的态度
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 11;12:626185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626185. eCollection 2021.
3
What Is the Zoo Experience? How Zoos Impact a Visitor's Behaviors, Perceptions, and Conservation Efforts.什么是动物园体验?动物园如何影响游客的行为、认知及保护行动。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 30;10:1746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01746. eCollection 2019.
4
The Animal-Visitor Interaction Protocol (AVIP) for the assessment of Lemur catta walk-in enclosure in zoos.动物园中评估环尾狐猴步入式围栏的动物访客互动协议(AVIP)。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0271409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271409. eCollection 2022.
5
The gap in technology for visitor experience in a zoo: A case study in Indonesia.动物园游客体验技术差距:印度尼西亚案例研究。
Zoo Biol. 2023 Jan;42(1):67-74. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21695. Epub 2022 May 24.
6
Assessing the effect of interpretation design traits on zoo visitor engagement.评估解说设计特点对动物园游客参与度的影响。
Zoo Biol. 2023 Jul-Aug;42(4):567-576. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21759. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
7
The Effect of Regulating Zoo Visitor-Penguin Interactions on Zoo Visitor Attitudes.规范动物园游客与企鹅互动对动物园游客态度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 17;10:2351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02351. eCollection 2019.
8
Zoo Visitors' Most-Liked Aspects of Elephant Encounters and Related Perceptions of Animals' Emotions and Welfare States: A Pragmatic Approach.动物园游客对大象互动体验的最喜欢方面以及对动物情感和福利状况的相关认知:一种实用方法。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Mar 17;14(6):923. doi: 10.3390/ani14060923.
9
High Prevalence of Dysfunctional Animal-Visitor Interactions in 225 Southeast Asian Zoos and Aquariums.225家东南亚动物园和水族馆中动物与游客之间功能失调互动的高发生率。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Nov 5;14(22):3167. doi: 10.3390/ani14223167.
10
An International Investigation of the Prevalence of Negative Visitor Behaviour in the Zoo.一项关于动物园负面游客行为发生率的国际调查。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 18;13(16):2661. doi: 10.3390/ani13162661.

本文引用的文献

1
Your place or mine? Exploring birdwatching tourists' behaviour disturbing birds in a nature reserve.去你那儿还是我这儿?探索观鸟游客在自然保护区惊扰鸟类的行为。
Eur J Wildl Res. 2023;69(3):44. doi: 10.1007/s10344-023-01678-y. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
2
Development of A Tool for Assessing the Reputation of Zoos: The Zoo Ethical Reputation Survey (ZERS).动物园声誉评估工具的开发:动物园伦理声誉调查(ZERS)
Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 17;12(20):2802. doi: 10.3390/ani12202802.
3
Is Animal Welfare an Internationally Understood Concept in the Zoo World? Thematic Analysis of Two Regional Groups of Zoo Staff.
动物福利在动物园界是一个国际通用的概念吗?对两个地区动物园工作人员群体的主题分析。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 10;11(7):2059. doi: 10.3390/ani11072059.
4
Human-Animal Interactions in Zoos: What Can Compassionate Conservation, Conservation Welfare and Duty of Care Tell Us about the Ethics of Interacting, and Avoiding Unintended Consequences?动物园中的人兽互动:富有同情心的保护、保护福利和照护责任能告诉我们哪些关于互动伦理以及避免意外后果的信息?
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 4;10(11):2037. doi: 10.3390/ani10112037.
5
Instagranimal: Animal Welfare and Animal Ethics Challenges of Animal-Based Tourism.“动物照片分享旅游”:基于动物的旅游业中的动物福利与动物伦理挑战。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 8;10(10):1830. doi: 10.3390/ani10101830.
6
What Is the Zoo Experience? How Zoos Impact a Visitor's Behaviors, Perceptions, and Conservation Efforts.什么是动物园体验?动物园如何影响游客的行为、认知及保护行动。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 30;10:1746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01746. eCollection 2019.
7
When zoo visitors "connect" with a zoo animal, what does that mean?当动物园游客与动物园动物“建立联系”时,这意味着什么?
Zoo Biol. 2019 Dec;38(6):461-470. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21509. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
8
A Global Review of Animal-Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare.现代动物园和水族馆中动物与游客互动的全球综述及其对野生动物福利的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jun 8;9(6):332. doi: 10.3390/ani9060332.
9
What Is the Future for Zoos and Aquariums?动物园和水族馆的未来何去何从?
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2018;21(sup1):59-70. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2018.1514302.
10
Learning from a provisioning site: code of conduct compliance and behaviour of whale sharks in Oslob, Cebu, Philippines.从一个供应点汲取经验:菲律宾宿务奥斯洛布鲸鲨的行为准则遵守情况及行为表现
PeerJ. 2015 Nov 26;3:e1452. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1452. eCollection 2015.