Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Kirschner Wire Fixation in Dorsally Displaced Distal Radius Fractures.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate and compare the biomechanical performance of two Kirschner (K) wire configurations-the intra-focal and interfragmentary techniques-for the fixation of dorsally displaced distal radius fractures. The study also assesses the impact of K-wire diameter (1.6 mm vs. 2.0 mm) on mechanical stability.

METHODS

Sixty fresh turkey tarsometatarsus bones were selected and divided into four groups based on the K-wire configuration and diameter used. Fractures were created at standardized locations, and each bone was stabilized using either the intra-focal also known as modified Kapandji (Ka) or interfragmentary technique. Mechanical testing, including axial compression and flexion tests, was performed to assess the biomechanical stability of each configuration.

RESULTS

The interfragmentary configuration consistently demonstrated superior biomechanical performance compared to the intra-focal technique. Specifically, the use of 2.0 mm K-wires resulted in significantly higher axial stiffness (13.28 MPa) and load at break (3070 N) compared to the 1.5 mm wires. Confidence intervals further supported the robustness of these findings. The interfragmentary technique, especially with thicker K-wires, provided greater load-bearing capacity and stiffness.

CONCLUSION

The interfragmentary technique with 2.0 mm K-wires offers superior mechanical stability compared to the intra-focal technique, making it the preferred choice for stabilizing comminuted extra-articular distal radius fractures. These findings suggest that adopting this technique may reduce the risk of postoperative complications such as fracture displacement or malunion. Further research involving osteoporotic bone models and clinical trials is recommended to validate these findings in real-world settings.