Geng Yunling, Zhang Shuaixing, Cao Zijing, Tang Jingyi, Cui Hailan, Dong Zhaocheng, Liu Yuning, Liu Weijing
Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education and Beijing, Renal Research Institution of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China.
Beijing Changping Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102200, China.
Toxics. 2024 Nov 25;12(12):846. doi: 10.3390/toxics12120846.
Patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) for chronic kidney disease (CKD) often encounter anemia. Roxadustat has not only undergone phase II-III clinical trials in patients suffering from CKD and undergoing HD; a number of post-marketing clinical studies have been conducted using the drug. This article was to assess the effectiveness and safety of roxadustat in managing anemia among patients with CKD undergoing HD.
A thorough search was performed across eight databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Wan Fang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP (CQ VIP), and SinoMed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) examining the effectiveness and safety of roxadustat in managing anemia among individuals suffering from CKD and undergoing HD. This search included studies from the inception of these databases to April 2023.
Two phase II, one phase III, and 16 post-marketing studies with 1688 participants were included. Serum iron (SI), transferrin, and total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) levels changed from baseline (∆SI, ∆transferrin, and ∆TIBC) and were significantly more increased for roxadustat than for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs): MD 2.55, (95% CI 1.51 to 3.60), < 0.00001; MD 0.55, (95% CI 0.41 to 0.69), < 0.00001; and MD 6.54, (95% CI 4.50 to 8.59), < 0.00001, respectively. Roxadustat was not inferior to ESAs with regard to increasing Hb (∆Hb) levels [MD 1.17 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.63), < 0.00001] (g/dL). No statistically significant distinctions of the ∆ferritin, ∆hepcidin, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) from baseline (∆TSAT) level were identified between roxadustat and ESAs. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels changed from baseline (∆CRP) and were significantly more reduced for roxadustat than for ESAs. As for safety, the analysis indicated no notable difference in the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) between roxadustat and ESAs.
This meta-analysis demonstrated that roxadustat outperformed ESAs in enhancing SI, transferrin, and TIBC levels while also decreasing CRP levels. Roxadustat was not inferior to ESAs in terms of improving Hb levels and safety. These findings suggest that roxadustat was well tolerated and a potent alternative to ESAs in managing anemia among patients suffering from CKD and undergoing HD.
慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者接受血液透析(HD)时常常会出现贫血。罗沙司他不仅在患有CKD并接受HD的患者中进行了II-III期临床试验;还开展了多项该药物的上市后临床研究。本文旨在评估罗沙司他在治疗接受HD的CKD患者贫血方面的有效性和安全性。
全面检索了八个数据库,包括PubMed、科学网、考克兰图书馆、Embase、万方、中国知网(CNKI)、重庆维普(CQ VIP)和中国生物医学文献数据库(SinoMed),以确定关于罗沙司他治疗患有CKD并接受HD的个体贫血的有效性和安全性的随机临床试验(RCT)。该检索涵盖了这些数据库建立之初至2023年4月的研究。
纳入了两项II期、一项III期和16项上市后研究,共1688名参与者。血清铁(SI)、转铁蛋白和总铁结合力(TIBC)水平相对于基线发生了变化(∆SI、∆转铁蛋白和∆TIBC),罗沙司他组的变化显著大于促红细胞生成剂(ESA)组:平均差(MD)为2.55,(95%置信区间[CI]为1.51至3.60),P<0.00001;MD为0.55,(95%CI为0.41至0.69),P<0.00001;MD为6.54,(95%CI为4.50至8.59),P<0.00001。在提高血红蛋白(∆Hb)水平方面,罗沙司他不劣于ESA组[MD为1.17(95%CI为0.71至1.63),P<0.00001](g/dL)。罗沙司他组和ESA组之间,相对于基线水平(∆铁蛋白、∆铁调素和转铁蛋白饱和度[TSAT])的∆铁蛋白、∆铁调素和TSAT水平未发现有统计学意义的差异。C反应蛋白(CRP)水平相对于基线发生了变化(∆CRP),罗沙司他组的变化显著大于ESA组。在安全性方面,分析表明罗沙司他组和ESA组在不良事件(AE)和严重不良事件(SAE)的发生上没有显著差异。
这项荟萃分析表明,罗沙司他在提高SI、转铁蛋白和TIBC水平方面优于ESA组,同时还能降低CRP水平。在改善Hb水平和安全性方面,罗沙司他不劣于ESA组。这些发现表明,罗沙司他耐受性良好,是治疗患有CKD并接受HD的患者贫血的有效ESA替代药物。