• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传染病专家与ChatGPT之间的推荐抗生素治疗协议。

Recommended antibiotic treatment agreement between infectious diseases specialists and ChatGPT.

作者信息

Montiel-Romero Santiago, Rajme-López Sandra, Román-Montes Carla Marina, López-Iñiguez Alvaro, Rivera-Villegas Héctor Orlando, Ochoa-Hein Eric, González-Lara María Fernanda, Ponce-de-León Alfredo, Tamez-Torres Karla María, Martinez-Guerra Bernardo Alfonso

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico, 15 Vasco de Quiroga, Belisario Domínguez Secc 16 Tlalpan, Mexico City, 14080.

Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Infectious Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico, 15 Vasco de Quiroga, Belisario Domínguez Secc 16 Tlalpan, Mexico City, 14080.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10426-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-024-10426-9
PMID:39773383
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706082/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance is a global threat to public health. Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is a language model tool based on artificial intelligence. ChatGPT could analyze data from antimicrobial susceptibility tests in real time, especially in places where infectious diseases (ID) specialists are not available. We aimed to evaluate the agreement between ChatGPT and ID specialists regarding appropriate antibiotic prescription in simulated cases.

METHODS

Using data from microbiological isolates recovered in our center, we fabricated 100 cases of patients with different infections. Each case included age, infectious syndrome, isolated organism and complete antibiogram. Considering a precise set of instructions, the cases were introduced into ChatGPT and presented to five ID specialists. For each case, we asked, (1) "What is the most appropriate antibiotic that should be prescribed to the patient in the clinical case?" and (2) "According to the interpretation of the antibiogram, what is the most probable mechanism of resistance?". We then calculated the agreement between ID specialists and ChatGPT, as well as Cohen's kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

Regarding the recommended antibiotic prescription, agreement between ID specialists and ChatGPT was observed in 51/100 cases. The calculated kappa coefficient was 0.48. Agreement on antimicrobial resistance mechanisms was observed in 42/100 cases. The calculated kappa coefficient was 0.39. In a subanalysis according to infectious syndromes and microorganisms, Agreement (range 25 - 80%) and kappa coefficients (range 0.21-0.79) varied.

CONCLUSION

We found poor agreement between ID specialists and ChatGPT regarding the recommended antibiotic management in simulated clinical cases.

摘要

背景

抗菌药物耐药性是对公共卫生的全球性威胁。聊天生成预训练变换器(ChatGPT)是一种基于人工智能的语言模型工具。ChatGPT可以实时分析抗菌药物敏感性试验的数据,尤其是在没有传染病(ID)专家的地方。我们旨在评估在模拟病例中ChatGPT与ID专家在适当抗生素处方方面的一致性。

方法

利用我们中心回收的微生物分离株数据,编造了100例不同感染患者的病例。每个病例包括年龄、感染综合征、分离出的病原体和完整的抗菌谱。按照一组精确的说明,将这些病例输入ChatGPT并呈现给五位ID专家。对于每个病例,我们询问:(1)“在这个临床病例中,应该给患者开的最合适的抗生素是什么?”以及(2)“根据抗菌谱的解读,最可能的耐药机制是什么?”然后我们计算了ID专家与ChatGPT之间的一致性以及科恩kappa系数。

结果

关于推荐的抗生素处方,在100例病例中有51例观察到ID专家与ChatGPT之间存在一致性。计算出的kappa系数为0.48。在100例病例中有42例观察到在抗菌药物耐药机制方面存在一致性。计算出的kappa系数为0.39。在根据感染综合征和微生物进行的亚分析中,一致性(范围为25%-80%)和kappa系数(范围为0.21-0.79)各不相同。

结论

我们发现在模拟临床病例中,ID专家与ChatGPT在推荐的抗生素管理方面一致性较差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e6d/11706082/9b30188436a7/12879_2024_10426_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e6d/11706082/9b30188436a7/12879_2024_10426_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e6d/11706082/9b30188436a7/12879_2024_10426_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Recommended antibiotic treatment agreement between infectious diseases specialists and ChatGPT.传染病专家与ChatGPT之间的推荐抗生素治疗协议。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10426-9.
2
Assessing ChatGPT's theoretical knowledge and prescriptive accuracy in bacterial infections: a comparative study with infectious diseases residents and specialists.评估ChatGPT在细菌感染方面的理论知识和诊断准确性:与传染病住院医师和专科医生的比较研究。
Infection. 2024 Jul 12. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02350-6.
3
Can Chatbot Artificial Intelligence Replace Infectious Diseases Physicians in the Management of Bloodstream Infections? A Prospective Cohort Study.人工智能聊天机器人能否在血流感染管理中取代传染病医生?一项前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 10;78(4):825-832. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad632.
4
Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) and Bard: Artificial Intelligence Does not yet Provide Clinically Supported Answers for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis.聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT)和巴德:人工智能尚未为髋和膝关节骨关节炎提供临床支持的答案。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 May;39(5):1184-1190. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.029. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
5
Performance of ChatGPT in Diagnosis of Corneal Eye Diseases.ChatGPT在角膜疾病诊断中的性能。
medRxiv. 2023 Aug 28:2023.08.25.23294635. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.25.23294635.
6
Artificial intelligence with ChatGPT 4: a large language model in support of ocular oncology cases.配备ChatGPT 4的人工智能:一种支持眼部肿瘤病例的大语言模型。
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 7;45(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03399-w.
7
Evaluating the reliability of ChatGPT as a tool for imaging test referral: a comparative study with a clinical decision support system.评估 ChatGPT 作为影像检查转诊工具的可靠性:与临床决策支持系统的对比研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 May;34(5):2826-2837. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10230-0. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
8
The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands.传染病专家团队对荷兰门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗的影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Feb;41(1):49-55. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0751-4. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
9
Can ChatGPT-4 evaluate whether a differential diagnosis list contains the correct diagnosis as accurately as a physician?ChatGPT-4能否像医生一样准确评估鉴别诊断列表是否包含正确的诊断?
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Mar 12;11(3):321-324. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0027. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
10
Pilot Testing of a Tool to Standardize the Assessment of the Quality of Health Information Generated by Artificial Intelligence-Based Models.用于规范基于人工智能模型生成的健康信息质量评估工具的试点测试。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 24;15(11):e49373. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49373. eCollection 2023 Nov.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential of ChatGPT in youth mental health emergency triage: Comparative analysis with clinicians.ChatGPT在青少年心理健康紧急分诊中的潜力:与临床医生的比较分析
PCN Rep. 2025 Jul 15;4(3):e70159. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.70159. eCollection 2025 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Complexity of Infectious Diseases Compared With Other Medical Subspecialties.与其他医学亚专业相比,传染病的复杂性。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Sep 8;10(9):ofad463. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad463. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Large language models encode clinical knowledge.大语言模型编码临床知识。
Nature. 2023 Aug;620(7972):172-180. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
3
Infectious Diseases Consultation Associated With Reduced Mortality in Gram-Negative Bacteremia.传染病咨询可降低革兰氏阴性菌血症的死亡率。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 11;77(9):1234-1237. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad383.
4
A study on the performance of ChatGPT in infectious diseases clinical consultation.ChatGPT在传染病临床咨询中的性能研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Aug;29(8):1088-1089. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.05.017. Epub 2023 May 18.
5
Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Infectious-Disease Surveillance.用于传染病监测的人工智能进展。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Apr 27;388(17):1597-1607. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2119215.
6
Potential Use of Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease: Take ChatGPT as an Example.人工智能在传染病学中的潜在应用:以 ChatGPT 为例。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 Jun;51(6):1130-1135. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03203-3. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
7
Benefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine.GPT-4作为医学人工智能聊天机器人的益处、局限性和风险
N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 30;388(13):1233-1239. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2214184.
8
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.医学中的人工智能
N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 30;388(13):1220-1221. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2206291.
9
ChatGPT and antimicrobial advice: the end of the consulting infection doctor?ChatGPT与抗菌药物建议:感染科会诊医生的终结?
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Apr;23(4):405-406. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00113-5. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
10
Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis.2019 年全球细菌对抗菌药物耐药性的负担:系统分析。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):629-655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. Epub 2022 Jan 19.