• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响预成金属冠和预成氧化锆冠的因素。

Factors influencing preformed metal crowns and prefabricated zirconia crowns.

作者信息

Deng Shuman, Dou Weiwei, Chen Ying, Chen Zhixiao, Song Ning, Gao Qi, Zhang Li, Xie Jing

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, Longgang Otorhinolaryngology Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jining Stomatological Hospital, Jining, China.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05391-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-05391-3
PMID:39773622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706186/
Abstract

BACKGOUND

Preformed metal crowns (PMCs) and zirconia crowns (ZCs) are commonly used for the treatment of primary molar caries. However, there have been no reports on factors influencing parental awareness, willingness to use these treatments, and the associated discomfort after crown placement in children.This study is the first to report factors influencing preformed crowns, providing a reference for the prevention and treatment of deciduous carious teeth.

METHODS

Parents whose children's posterior caries were restored with preformed crowns at Shenzhen Children's Hospital from October 2021 to October 2023 were recruited. A questionnaire gathered data on multiple variables, including basic information about the participants, their oral health behaviors, and their attitudes toward oral health.

RESULTS

Approximately two-thirds of the surveyed parents were aware of preformed metal crowns (PMCs) (67.8%), whereas over half were hardly aware of prefabricated zirconia crowns (ZCs) (59.6%). In terms of discomfort symptoms, 105 (76.7%) and 102 (76.1%) cases were reported after PMC and ZC placement respectively; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Among the surveyed parents, 19 (8.7%) expressed that they could not accept the PMC color, whereas all could accept the ZC color, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). A total of 217 parents (99.5%) could accept PMCs to protect or repair primary carious teeth; 29.8% of the parents stated that they were reluctant to use ZCs to protect or repair their children's deciduous teeth, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). In terms of location selection, the majority of surveyed parents chose comprehensive hospitals (58.7%) and stomatological hospitals (41.3%). In terms of institution selection, priority was given to the doctor's qualifications (90.4%). Pearson correlation analysis revealed that "acceptance of the PMC color", "oral health awareness", and "parental willingness to use PMCs" were positively correlated (P < 0.05) and that "non-nuclear family status" was negatively related to "parental willingness to use PMCs" (P < 0.05). The logistic multiple regression analysis revealed that oral health awareness and restoration awareness significantly affected the duration of discomfort symptoms after PMC placement (P < 0.15). Children with higher annual family incomes, families with fewer children, lower consumption of desserts, better oral health awareness, and teeth brushing under the assistance of their parents showed a dramatic decline in untimely PMC repair (P < 0.15); children who brushed their teeth less and whose parents had a poorer perception of restoration methods showed an increase in untimely PMC repair (P < 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

This discrepancy is reflected in the cognition and willingness to use PMCs and ZCs. PMCs are more accepted due to cost, whereas ZCs are preferred for aesthetics. The factors affecting PMC restoration are oral health awareness, manner of restoration, family income, number of children, consumption of desserts, and toothbrushing frequency.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d3/11706186/dbc735b8cb51/12903_2024_5391_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d3/11706186/dbc735b8cb51/12903_2024_5391_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d3/11706186/dbc735b8cb51/12903_2024_5391_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

预成金属冠(PMCs)和氧化锆冠(ZCs)常用于治疗乳磨牙龋齿。然而,关于影响家长对这些治疗方法的认知、使用意愿以及儿童戴冠后相关不适的因素,此前尚无报道。本研究首次报道了影响预成冠的因素,为乳牙龋齿的防治提供参考。

方法

招募2021年10月至2023年10月期间在深圳儿童医院为患有后牙龋齿的孩子进行预成冠修复的家长。通过问卷调查收集了多个变量的数据,包括参与者的基本信息、口腔健康行为以及他们对口腔健康的态度。

结果

约三分之二的受访家长知晓预成金属冠(PMCs)(67.8%),而超过半数家长对预成氧化锆冠(ZCs)几乎不了解(59.6%)。在不适症状方面,PMCs和ZCs戴冠后分别有105例(76.7%)和102例(76.1%)出现不适症状报告;然而,两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在受访家长中,19例(8.7%)表示无法接受PMCs的颜色,而所有家长都能接受ZCs的颜色,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。共有217名家长(99.5%)能够接受PMCs用于保护或修复乳牙龋齿;29.8%的家长表示不愿意使用ZCs来保护或修复孩子的乳牙,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在就诊地点选择方面,大多数受访家长选择综合医院(58.7%)和口腔医院(41.3%)。在机构选择方面,优先考虑医生资质(90.4%)。Pearson相关分析显示,“对PMCs颜色的接受度”“口腔健康意识”和“家长使用PMCs的意愿度”呈正相关(P<0.05),而“非核心家庭状况”与“家长使用PMCs的意愿度”呈负相关(P<0.05)。Logistic多元回归分析显示,口腔健康意识和修复意识显著影响PMCs戴冠后不适症状的持续时间(P<0.15)。家庭年收入较高、孩子数量较少、甜食摄入量较低、口腔健康意识较好且在家长协助下刷牙的儿童,PMCs修复不及时的情况显著减少(P<0.15);刷牙次数较少且家长对修复方法认知较差的儿童,PMCs修复不及时的情况增加(P<0.15)。

结论

这种差异体现在对PMCs和ZCs的认知和使用意愿上。由于成本因素,PMCs更易被接受,而ZCs因美观性更受青睐。影响PMCs修复的因素包括口腔健康意识、修复方式、家庭收入、孩子数量、甜食摄入量和刷牙频率。

相似文献

1
Factors influencing preformed metal crowns and prefabricated zirconia crowns.影响预成金属冠和预成氧化锆冠的因素。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05391-3.
2
Efficacy evaluation of zirconia crown on primary molars with caries defects.氧化锆全瓷冠修复乳磨牙龋损的疗效评价。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Oct 1;42(5):652-659. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024122.
3
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.乳牙龋齿的预成冠
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 31;2015(12):CD005512. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005512.pub3.
4
PLACEMENT OF PREFORMED METAL CROWNS ON CARIOUS PRIMARY MOLARS BY DENTAL HYGIENE/THERAPY VOCATIONAL TRAINEES IN SCOTLAND: A SERVICE EVALUATION ASSESSING PATIENT AND PARENT SATISFACTION.苏格兰牙科保健/治疗职业培训生为患龋乳磨牙放置预成金属冠:一项评估患者及家长满意度的服务评价
Prim Dent J. 2015 Nov;4(4):46-51. doi: 10.1308/205016815816682218.
5
Preformed pediatric zirconia crown versus preformed pediatric metal crown: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.预制儿童氧化锆冠与预制儿童金属冠的比较:一项随机临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Aug 24;20(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3559-1.
6
Child and parental acceptance of preformed metal crowns.儿童及家长对预成金属冠的接受度。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010 Oct;11(5):218-24. doi: 10.1007/BF03262750.
7
Parental-caregiver perception of child oral-health related quality of life following zirconia crown placement and non-restoration of carious primary anterior teeth.家长/照顾者对氧化锆全瓷冠修复和未修复乳前牙龋齿后儿童口腔健康相关生活质量的感知。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Mar;19(1):21-28. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2018.19.01.04.
8
Evaluation of stress generation in core build up-material of mutilated primary teeth: a comparative finite element analysis between BioFlx, stainless steel and zirconia crowns.评价残根核堆积材料的应力量:BioFlx、不锈钢和氧化锆冠的比较有限元分析。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Nov;48(6):117-122. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.132. Epub 2024 Nov 3.
9
Clinical Comparison of Preformed Zirconia and Composite Strip Crowns in Primary Maxillary Incisors: 18-Month Results of a Prospective, Randomized Trial.临床比较预成氧化锆和复合带状冠在前牙的应用:一项前瞻性、随机试验的 18 个月结果。
Pediatr Dent. 2022 Nov 15;44(6):416-422.
10
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) of preschool children's anterior teeth restored with zirconia crowns versus resin-bonded composite strip crowns: a 12-month prospective clinical trial.学龄前儿童前牙采用氧化锆全瓷冠与树脂粘接复合带冠修复后口腔相关生活质量的比较:一项 12 个月的前瞻性临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 May;26(5):3923-3938. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04359-9. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns and Preformed Metal Crowns in the Treatment of Severely Childhood Caries and Anterior Crossbite in a Child with Autistic Spectrum Disorder.预制氧化锆冠和预成金属冠在治疗患有自闭症谱系障碍儿童的重度儿童龋齿和前牙反合中的应用
Case Rep Dent. 2024 Feb 15;2024:5556502. doi: 10.1155/2024/5556502. eCollection 2024.
2
Variations in Primary Molar Contact and Approximal Caries in Children: A Three-Year Prospective Cohort Study.儿童第一乳磨牙接触与邻面龋的变化:一项为期三年的前瞻性队列研究。
Pediatr Dent. 2023 Sep 15;45(5):434-442.
3
Mothers' Awareness of the Correlation between Their Own and Their Children's Oral Health.
母亲对自身及其子女口腔健康相关性的认知。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 14;19(22):14967. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214967.
4
Best clinical practice guidance for treating deep carious lesions in primary teeth: an EAPD policy document.治疗乳牙深龋病损的最佳临床实践指南:EAPD 政策文件。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022 Oct;23(5):659-666. doi: 10.1007/s40368-022-00718-6. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
5
Exploring Parent's Satisfaction and the Effectiveness of Preformed Metal Crowns Fitting by Hall Technique for Carious Primary Molars in Jeddah Region, Saudi Arabia: Findings of a Prospective Cohort Study.探索沙特阿拉伯吉达地区采用霍尔技术为龋坏乳牙安装预成金属冠时家长的满意度及效果:一项前瞻性队列研究的结果
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Sep 8;16:2497-2507. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S370159. eCollection 2022.
6
Expert consensus on early childhood caries management.儿童龋病管理专家共识。
Int J Oral Sci. 2022 Jul 14;14(1):35. doi: 10.1038/s41368-022-00186-0.
7
A comparison of the mechanical proprieties of different types of primary tooth restorations: an in vitro study.不同类型乳牙修复体机械性能的比较:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jun;26(6):4419-4426. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04404-1. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
8
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) of preschool children's anterior teeth restored with zirconia crowns versus resin-bonded composite strip crowns: a 12-month prospective clinical trial.学龄前儿童前牙采用氧化锆全瓷冠与树脂粘接复合带冠修复后口腔相关生活质量的比较:一项 12 个月的前瞻性临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 May;26(5):3923-3938. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04359-9. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
9
Can zirconia crowns be the first restorative choice after endodontic treatment of primary teeth?乳牙根管治疗后,氧化锆全瓷冠可否作为首选修复体?
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;75(12):e14888. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14888. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
10
Evaluation and comparison two types of prefabricated zirconia crowns in mixed and primary dentition: A randomized clinical trial.混合牙列和乳牙列中两种预成氧化锆冠的评估与比较:一项随机临床试验。
Heliyon. 2021 Feb 16;7(2):e06240. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06240. eCollection 2021 Feb.