Suppr超能文献

“他们在乎吗?”:对美国患者关于初级保健临床医生与阿片类药物相关沟通的观点进行的定性研究

'Do they care?': a qualitative examination of patient perspectives on primary care clinician communication related to opioids in the USA.

作者信息

Olson Anthony W, Bucaloiu Andrei, Allen Clayton I, Tusing Lorraine D, Henzler-Buckingham Hillary A, Gregor Christina M, Freitag Laura A, Hooker Stephanie A, Rossom Rebecca C, Solberg Leif I, Wright Eric A, Haller Irina V, Romagnoli Katrina M

机构信息

Research Division, Essentia Institute of Rural Health, Duluth, Minnesota, USA

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):e090462. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090462.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This substudy's objectives were to (1) examine the transferability of a four archetype framework (simplified pattern of prototypical features) for patients at high risk for opioid use disorder (OUD) developed from a previous study with a similar population; (2) explore how patient preferences for terminology can inform clinician communication strategies for patients with OUD across archetypes and (3) explore how patient perceptions of opioid risks can inform clinician communication strategies across patient archetypes.

DESIGN

This qualitative study collected data via semistructured phone interviews with patients about views on opioid-related discussions with primary care clinicians. Qualitative data were coded using the Rigorous and Accelerated Data Reduction technique and analysed via iterative inductive/deductive thematic analysis.

SETTING

40 primary care clinics affiliated with two health systems (site1=Pennsylvania; site2=Minnesota, Wisconsin and North Dakota).

PARTICIPANTS

40 adults meeting one of the following: OUD diagnosis; taking medication for OUD (MOUD) and ≥3 opioid prescriptions in the previous year.

RESULTS

The aforementioned four archetype framework transferred well to the study sample and hinted at archetype differences in participant OUD-terminology preferences and opioid risk perceptions. Two additional archetypes of 'in treatment/recovery for OUD and not taking MOUD' and 'in treatment/recovery for OUD and taking MOUD' were identified. Participants best fitting archetypes 1-4 preferred clinicians to refrain from using addiction terminology to describe their relationship with opioids, finding the term 'dependence' as more appropriate and a signal that clinicians cared for patients. Participants who best first archetypes 5-6 felt 'addiction' was an appropriate, direct term that accurately described their condition, often using it themselves. Patients in all archetypes recognised risks of harm from using opioids, especially participants fitting archetypes 2, 5 and 6 who conveyed the greatest concern.

CONCLUSION

The modified six archetype framework may help clinicians tailor their communication and care for patients diagnosed with or at high risk for OUD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04198428.

摘要

目的

本亚研究的目的是:(1) 检验从先前针对类似人群的研究中得出的、用于阿片类物质使用障碍(OUD)高风险患者的四原型框架(原型特征的简化模式)的可转移性;(2) 探讨患者对术语的偏好如何为跨原型的 OUD 患者的临床医生沟通策略提供信息;(3) 探讨患者对阿片类物质风险的认知如何为跨患者原型的临床医生沟通策略提供信息。

设计

本定性研究通过与患者进行半结构化电话访谈收集数据,了解他们对与初级保健临床医生进行阿片类物质相关讨论的看法。定性数据使用严格和加速数据简化技术进行编码,并通过迭代归纳/演绎主题分析进行分析。

设置

隶属于两个卫生系统的 40 家初级保健诊所(地点 1 = 宾夕法尼亚州;地点 2 = 明尼苏达州、威斯康星州和北达科他州)。

参与者

40 名成年人,符合以下条件之一:OUD 诊断;正在接受 OUD 药物治疗(MOUD)且上一年有≥3 张阿片类药物处方。

结果

上述四原型框架很好地转移到了研究样本中,并暗示了参与者在 OUD 术语偏好和阿片类物质风险认知方面的原型差异。另外还确定了“正在接受 OUD 治疗/康复且未服用 MOUD”和“正在接受 OUD 治疗/康复且服用 MOUD”这两个原型。最符合原型 1 - 4 的参与者更喜欢临床医生避免使用成瘾术语来描述他们与阿片类物质的关系,认为“依赖”一词更合适,且是临床医生关心患者的一个信号。最符合原型 5 - 6 的参与者认为“成瘾”是一个合适、直接的术语,能准确描述他们的状况,他们自己也经常使用。所有原型的患者都认识到使用阿片类物质的危害风险,尤其是符合原型 2、5 和 6 的参与者,他们表达了最大的担忧。

结论

修改后的六原型框架可能有助于临床医生为被诊断为 OUD 或有 OUD 高风险的患者量身定制沟通方式和护理方案。

试验注册号

NCT04198428。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d00/11749487/8066cb6f7ff6/bmjopen-15-1-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验