• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微波消融治疗T1a期小肾肿瘤的孤立肾患者的疗效和安全性

Efficacy and safety of microwave ablation in solitary kidney patients with T1a small renal masses.

作者信息

Justo-Jaume Carlos, Stempel Max, Qiu Jessica, Gonzalez Miranda Luis, Yan Guofen, Lyons Genevieve, Sands Kenneth, Schenkman Noah, Krupski Tracey, Culp Stephen, Lobo Jennifer

机构信息

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jan 7. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04779-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-024-04779-7
PMID:39775024
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of using microwave ablation (MWA) to treat solitary kidney (SK) patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database identified patients with T1a RCC with either congenital or acquired SK. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated from serum creatinine before MWA and after at 6 and 12 months post-procedure. The local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastatic-recurrence free survival (MRFS), cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients met inclusion criteria, including 3 congenital and 23 acquired SK patients. eGFR was lower at both 6 and 12 months post-procedure compared to pre-procedure, with the congenital SK group having a more pronounced reduction in eGFR at both post-procedure timepoints. Median follow-up time was 28.6 months (IQR 12.4-55.4). Four patients (15.4%) experienced local recurrence. For LRFS, mean survival time was 69.4 months. There were 5 patients (19.2%) that experienced metastatic recurrence, with median and mean survival time at 101.1 and 82.0 months, respectively. The mean time for RCC-specific survival was 94.7 months, while median and mean time for overall survival was 43.1 and 61.7 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

With a moderate reduction in renal function and a comparable rate of local recurrence compared to prior literature, this work demonstrates that MWA remains a viable alternative to more invasive techniques, particularly for high-risk SK patients with RCC. Our work highlights the need for further research on effectiveness of MWA in cancer control and preservation of renal function in larger cohorts of SK patients over extended follow-up times.

摘要

目的

评估使用微波消融(MWA)治疗孤立肾(SK)合并T1a期肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的安全性和有效性。

方法

对一个前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性分析,确定患有先天性或后天性SK的T1a期RCC患者。根据MWA术前及术后6个月和12个月时的血清肌酐计算估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析局部无复发生存率(LRFS)、远处无复发生存率(MRFS)、癌症特异性生存率和总生存率。

结果

共有26例患者符合纳入标准,包括3例先天性SK患者和23例后天性SK患者。与术前相比,术后6个月和12个月时eGFR均降低,先天性SK组在两个术后时间点eGFR降低更为明显。中位随访时间为28.6个月(四分位间距12.4 - 55.4)。4例患者(15.4%)出现局部复发。对于LRFS,平均生存时间为69.4个月。有5例患者(19.2%)出现远处复发,中位生存时间和平均生存时间分别为101.1个月和82.0个月。RCC特异性生存的平均时间为94.7个月;而总生存的中位时间和平均时间分别为43.1个月和61.7个月。

结论

与先前文献相比,肾功能有适度下降且局部复发率相当,本研究表明MWA仍然是侵入性更强技术的可行替代方案,特别是对于高危的SK合并RCC患者。我们的研究强调需要在更大规模的SK患者队列中进行更长时间的随访,进一步研究MWA在癌症控制和肾功能保留方面的有效性。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of microwave ablation in solitary kidney patients with T1a small renal masses.微波消融治疗T1a期小肾肿瘤的孤立肾患者的疗效和安全性
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jan 7. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04779-7.
2
Percutaneous microwave ablation of cT1b renal cell carcinoma: safety and oncologic efficacy in a large, single-center elderly and comorbid cohort.经皮微波消融治疗cT1b期肾细胞癌:大型单中心老年及合并症队列的安全性和肿瘤学疗效
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Feb 6. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04794-8.
3
Percutaneous Microwave Ablation versus Cryoablation for Small Renal Masses (≤4 cm): 12-Year Experience at a Single Center.经皮微波消融与冷冻消融治疗≤4cm 小肾癌:单中心 12 年经验
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024 Jun;35(6):865-873. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
4
Evaluating Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma with Minimum 10 Years of Follow-Up.评估T1a期肾细胞癌射频消融的长期肿瘤学结局:至少10年随访
J Endourol. 2025 Jun;39(6):594-600. doi: 10.1089/end.2024.0849. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
5
Long-term Renal Function Outcomes After Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma Including Patients with a Solitary Kidney: A Report from the International Radiosurgery Oncology Consortium of the Kidney.立体定向消融放疗治疗原发性肾细胞癌(包括孤立肾患者)后的长期肾功能结局:来自国际肾脏放射外科肿瘤学联盟的报告
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Dec;7(6):1527-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.06.012. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
6
Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Small (<4 cm) Renal Masses Performed under Moderate Sedation.在适度镇静下进行经皮微波消融治疗小(<4cm)肾肿块
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2025 Jul;36(7):1171-1178.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2025.03.024. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
7
Salvage stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy after thermal ablation of primary kidney cancer.原发性肾癌热消融后挽救性立体定向消融体部放疗
BJU Int. 2025 Jan;135(1):110-116. doi: 10.1111/bju.16520. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
8
Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b and T2 Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术治疗 T1b 和 T2 期临床肾肿瘤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):606-617. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.060. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
9
Microwave ablation of renal tumors: A narrative review of technical considerations and clinical results.微波消融治疗肾肿瘤:技术要点和临床疗效的叙述性综述。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017 Apr;98(4):287-297. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
10
A Comparison of Microwave Ablation and Cryoablation for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.微波消融与冷冻消融治疗肾细胞癌的比较:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Urology. 2023 Oct;180:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes after cryoablation or partial nephrectomy for small renal masses in solitary kidneys: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单肾小体积肿瘤行冷冻消融或部分肾切除术的围手术期、功能和肿瘤学结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2024 Jan 24;24(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01406-x.
2
Thermal Ablation Versus Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Renal Mass in a Solitary Kidney: A Matched Cohort Comparative Analysis.孤立肾中 cT1 期肾肿瘤的热消融与部分肾切除术:一项匹配队列比较分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;31(3):2133-2143. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14646-2. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
3
Comparison of microwave ablation and partial nephrectomy for T1a small renal masses.
T1a期小肾肿瘤的微波消融与部分肾切除术的比较
Urol Oncol. 2023 Oct;41(10):434.e9-434.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.07.008. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
4
Microwave ablation of the T1a small renal mass: expanding beyond 3 cm.T1a期小肾肿瘤的微波消融:超越3厘米的拓展
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Aug;48(8):2695-2704. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03935-9. Epub 2023 May 22.
5
Radiofrequency Ablation, Cryoablation, and Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses: Efficacy and Complications.射频消融、冷冻消融和微波消融治疗小肾肿瘤:疗效与并发症
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;13(3):388. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030388.
6
Clinical T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma, Not Always a Harmless Disease-A National Register Study.临床T1a期肾细胞癌,并非总是一种无害疾病——一项全国登记研究
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Apr 1;39:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.03.005. eCollection 2022 May.
7
New Creatinine- and Cystatin C-Based Equations to Estimate GFR without Race.新型基于肌酐和胱抑素 C 的估算肾小球滤过率方程,无需考虑种族因素。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1737-1749. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102953. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
8
Efficacy and safety of CT-guided microwave ablation for stage T1a renal cell carcinoma in patients with a solitary kidney.CT 引导下微波消融治疗孤立肾 T1a 期肾癌的疗效及安全性。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):691-695. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1915503.
9
Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Category T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: Intermediate Results on Safety, Technical Feasibility, and Clinical Outcomes of 119 Tumors.经皮微波消融治疗 T1a 期肾癌:119 个肿瘤的安全性、技术可行性和临床结果的中期结果。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jan;216(1):117-124. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22818. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
10
Current Management of Patients With Acquired Solitary Kidney.获得性孤立肾患者的当前管理
Kidney Int Rep. 2019 Jul 11;4(9):1205-1218. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.07.001. eCollection 2019 Sep.