Ghorbani Najmeh, Alizadeh Maryam, Sayarifard Azadeh, Khajavi Abdoljavad, Yenawine Philip
Ph.D. Student of Medical Education, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine and Health Professions Education Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 8;25(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06642-9.
Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS) is an evidence-based pedagogical approach that uses art analysis and structured inquiry to enhance observation, critical thinking, and teamwork, especially in medical training for clinical skills development. This study aimed to compare the short-term and delayed follow-up effects of integrating Visual Thinking Strategies and Visual Thinking Activity (VTA) tasks based on the PRISM Model with Observation Exercises (OE) on medical students' observation skills, including the number of observations, number of words used, and time spent describing observations.
This pre- and post-test experimental study with a control group was conducted among first-year medical students at Gonabad University of Medical Sciences during the 2023-2024 academic year. Forty-four students participated in the intervention group, receiving VTS and VTA tasks, while 45 students formed the control group, engaging in OE alone. Observation skills were assessed using standardized art images (short-term) and real-world clinical exposure (delayed follow-up) through measures of total observations, number of words used, and time spent describing observations. Descriptive statistics, analysis of one-way ANOVA/ANCOVA, and independent t-tests were employed for data analysis.
In the short-term evaluation, the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher performance in the total number of observations (p = 0.001, Adjusted Partial Eta2 = 0.12), number of words used to describe art images (p = 0.001, Adjusted Partial Eta2 = 0.21), and time spent analyzing images (p < 0.001, Adjusted Partial Eta2 = 0.17) compared to the control group. However, after one month in a clinical exposure, no significant differences were found between the groups in the total number of observations (p = 0.62) and number of words used (p = 0.64). Nevertheless, the intervention group spent significantly more time describing their clinical observations (p = 0.04, Effect Size = 0.44).
The findings highlight the significant role of VTS in enhancing medical students' observation skills. While both interventions were equally effective in the delayed follow-up and real-world settings regarding the total number of observations and words used, the VTS and VTA approach led to a notable increase in the time spent on observation descriptions. This conclusion warrants further investigation in future studies.
视觉思维策略(VTS)是一种基于证据的教学方法,它利用艺术分析和结构化探究来提高观察力、批判性思维和团队合作能力,特别是在临床技能培养的医学培训中。本研究旨在比较基于PRISM模型整合视觉思维策略和视觉思维活动(VTA)任务与观察练习(OE)对医学生观察技能的短期和延迟随访效果,包括观察次数、描述观察所用的词汇数量以及描述观察所花费的时间。
本学年在戈纳巴德医科大学对一年级医学生进行了一项有对照组的前后测实验研究。44名学生参与干预组,接受VTS和VTA任务,而45名学生组成对照组,仅进行OE。通过总观察次数、描述观察所用的词汇数量以及描述观察所花费的时间等指标,使用标准化艺术图像(短期)和实际临床接触(延迟随访)来评估观察技能。采用描述性统计、单向方差分析/协方差分析以及独立t检验进行数据分析。
在短期评估中,与对照组相比,干预组在总观察次数(p = 0.001,调整后的偏 eta 平方 = 0.12)、描述艺术图像所用的词汇数量(p = 0.001,调整后的偏 eta 平方 = 0.21)以及分析图像所花费的时间(p < 0.001,调整后的偏 eta 平方 = 0.17)方面表现出显著更高的水平。然而,在临床接触一个月后,两组在总观察次数(p = 0.62)和描述观察所用的词汇数量(p = 0.64)方面没有发现显著差异。尽管如此,干预组在描述临床观察方面花费的时间显著更多(p = 0.04,效应量 = 0.44)。
研究结果突出了VTS在提高医学生观察技能方面的重要作用。虽然两种干预措施在延迟随访和实际临床环境中关于总观察次数和所用词汇数量方面同样有效,但VTS和VTA方法导致在观察描述上花费的时间显著增加。这一结论值得在未来研究中进一步探讨。