Brinkman Joseph C, Lin Eugenia A, Moore M Lane, Verma Nikhil N, Tokish John M
Mayo Clinic Arizona Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2025 Jul;53(8):2013-2021. doi: 10.1177/03635465241278328. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
The Latarjet and other bony augmentation procedures are commonly used to treat anterior shoulder instability in the setting of significant glenoid bone loss. Although several fixation strategies have been reported, the biomechanical strength of these techniques remains poorly understood.
To perform a systematic review of the biomechanical strength of glenoid bony augmentation procedures for anterior shoulder instability.
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
A systematic search of the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify biomechanical studies evaluating various fixation strategies for coracoid and other bone transfer procedures for anterior shoulder instability. Biomechanical results included load to failure with both compression and traction forces, stiffness, and cyclic displacement. The quality of included articles was assessed based on the Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies (QUACS) scale.
A total of 21 biomechanical studies comprising 486 specimens were included. The number of screws used and the addition of washers were found to significantly increase rigidity and load to failure. The comparison of fixation techniques demonstrated mixed results in load to failure between screw and alternative constructs including suture buttons and suture anchors. However, studies that tested graft displacement consistently found more graft displacement in buttons compared with screws. The median and mean of the QUACS scale were both 12, with a range of 10-13.
Biomechanical studies consistently demonstrated that when glenoid bone grafts were fixed with screws, the number of screws and use of washers significantly increased construct rigidity and load to failure. Different metal screw materials and sizes did not consistently demonstrate a significant difference in biomechanical strength. There are mixed results when comparing suture buttons to screw fixation. The evaluated studies revealed that all double metal screw constructs and the majority of suture button and anchor constructs were able to withstand the glenohumeral load reflective of activities of daily living using a 150-N threshold.
拉塔热(Latarjet)手术及其他骨增强手术常用于治疗存在明显肩胛盂骨丢失情况下的前肩不稳。尽管已有多种固定策略的报道,但这些技术的生物力学强度仍知之甚少。
对用于前肩不稳的肩胛盂骨增强手术的生物力学强度进行系统评价。
系统评价;证据等级,4级。
对Medline、Embase、科学网和考克兰图书馆数据库进行系统检索,以识别评估喙突及其他骨移植手术用于前肩不稳的各种固定策略的生物力学研究。生物力学结果包括压缩力和牵张力作用下的破坏载荷、刚度和循环位移。根据尸体研究质量评估(QUACS)量表对纳入文章的质量进行评估。
共纳入21项生物力学研究,包含486个标本。发现使用螺钉的数量及添加垫圈可显著增加刚度和破坏载荷。固定技术的比较显示,螺钉与包括缝线纽扣和缝线锚钉在内的替代结构在破坏载荷方面的结果不一。然而,测试移植物位移的研究一致发现,与螺钉相比,纽扣固定时移植物位移更多。QUACS量表的中位数和平均值均为12,范围为10 - 13。
生物力学研究一致表明,当用螺钉固定肩胛盂骨移植时,螺钉数量和垫圈的使用可显著增加结构刚度和破坏载荷。不同金属螺钉材料和尺寸在生物力学强度方面并未始终显示出显著差异。比较缝线纽扣与螺钉固定时结果不一。评估研究显示,所有双金属螺钉结构以及大多数缝线纽扣和锚钉结构能够承受反映日常生活活动的150 N阈值的盂肱关节负荷。