Groppelli Antonella, Russo Vincenzo, Parente Erika, Comune Angelo, de Lange Frederik J, Rivasi Giulia, Rafanelli Martina, Deharo Jean Claude, Francisco-Pascual Jaume, Maggi Roberto, Fedorowski Artur, Ungar Andrea, Parati Gianfranco, Brignole Michele
Department of Cardiology, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Faint and Fall Research Centre, S. Luca Hospital, Piazzale Brescia 20, Milano 20149, Italy.
Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Cardiology and Syncope Unit, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli'-Monaldi Hospital, Piazzale E. Ruggeri, Naples 80126, Italy.
Eur Heart J. 2025 Mar 3;46(9):827-835. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae907.
Identifying the haemodynamic mechanism of autonomic syncope is the essential pre-requisite for effective and personalized therapy aimed at preventing recurrences. The present study assessed the diagnostic efficacy of a two-step assessment.
Multicentre prospective, cross-sectional, observational study. Patients affected by severe autonomic syncope underwent a two-step assessment including 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and short cardiovascular autonomic function assessment (SCAFA). SCAFA consisted of carotid sinus massage (CSM), performed in patients ≥40 years old, a passive standing test, and a 'fast' head-up tilt test scheduled sequentially during one session on a tilt table.
The study population consisted of 333 patients, 102 ≤ 40 years old and 231 > 40 years old. Any positive response was observed in 298 (89%) patients (92 [92%] in younger and 134 [89%] in older), with hypotensive phenotype accounting for 226 (68%), bradycardic phenotype for 21 (6%) and mixed phenotype for 51 (15%) of cases. The mean duration of the SCAFA procedure was 25 (IQR 20-32) min. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, CSM, passive standing, and head-up tilt test were positive in 60%, 15%, 3%, and 71% of patients, respectively. More than one test was positive in 51% and 49% of patients ≤40 and >40 years, respectively. Large inter-centre variability of CSM positivity rate, which remained significant after adjustment for demographic and clinical variables, was observed (P = .003).
The standardized 2STEPS protocol offers an easy-to-perform and time-saving diagnostic work-up allowing identification of the haemodynamic mechanism of loss of consciousness in most patients with autonomic syncope. This protocol provides the necessary background for a personalized mechanism-specific therapy.
识别自主神经介导性晕厥的血流动力学机制是有效且个性化预防复发治疗的必要前提。本研究评估了两步评估法的诊断效能。
多中心前瞻性横断面观察性研究。重度自主神经介导性晕厥患者接受两步评估,包括24小时动态血压监测和短程心血管自主神经功能评估(SCAFA)。SCAFA包括对≥40岁患者进行的颈动脉窦按摩(CSM)、被动站立试验以及在倾斜台上一次检查期间依次进行的“快速”头高位倾斜试验。
研究人群包括333例患者,其中102例年龄≤40岁,231例年龄>40岁。298例(89%)患者出现任何阳性反应(年龄较小者92例[92%],年龄较大者134例[89%]),其中低血压型占226例(68%),心动过缓型占21例(6%),混合型占51例(15%)。SCAFA检查的平均时长为25(四分位间距20 - 32)分钟。动态血压监测、CSM、被动站立试验和头高位倾斜试验的阳性率分别为60%、15%、3%和71%。年龄≤40岁和>40岁的患者中,分别有51%和49%的患者不止一项检查呈阳性。观察到CSM阳性率存在较大的中心间差异,在对人口统计学和临床变量进行调整后差异仍显著(P = .003)。
标准化的2STEPS方案提供了一种易于实施且节省时间的诊断方法,能够识别大多数自主神经介导性晕厥患者意识丧失的血流动力学机制。该方案为个性化的机制特异性治疗提供了必要依据。