Zhang Weina, Cai Jiaoyang, Wang Xiang, Ma Yani, Zhu Xiaofan, Yu Jie, Xiao Peifang, Gao Ju, Fang Yongjun, Liang Changda, Li Xue, Zhou Fen, Zhai Xiaowen, Xu Xiaoxiao, Tian Xin, Liu Aiguo, Wang Ningling, Zhu Jiashi, Wang Lingzhen, Cheng Frankie Wai-Tsoi, Yang Liangchun, Zhang Ge, Cheng Cheng, Yang Jun J, Shen Shuhong, Li Chi-Kong, Li Benshang, Jiang Hua, Pui Ching-Hon
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Guangzhou Medical University Affiliated Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology of China Ministry of Health, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Blood. 2025 Apr 24;145(17):1890-1902. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024026381.
We evaluated the prognostic and therapeutic significance of measurable residual disease (MRD) during remission induction in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In the Chinese Children Cancer Group ALL 2015 protocol, 7640 patients were categorized into low-, intermediate-, or high-risk groups based on clinical and genetic features. Final risk classification was determined by assessing MRD using flow cytometry on days 19 and 46 of remission induction with additional intensified chemotherapy for day 19 MRD ≥1%. Patients with B-ALL with negative MRD (<0.01%) on day 19 or day 46 had significantly better 5-year event-free survival (EFS) than those with MRD of between 0.01% and 0.99% who, in turn, had better EFS than patients with MRD of ≥1%. Provisional low-risk patients with day 19 MRD ≥1% but negative day 46 MRD who were reclassified as intermediate risk had a 5-year EFS that was comparable with that of low-risk patients with day 19 MRD of 0.3% to 0.99% and negative day 46 MRD (82.5% vs 83.0%) and better EFS than provisional low-risk patients with MRD on both days (83.0% vs 72.6%; P < .001). Similarly, patients with provisional intermediate-risk B-ALL with day 19 MRD ≥1% but negative day 46 MRD who received additional therapy had better 5-year EFS than those with day 19 MRD between 0.3% and 0.99% (70.7% vs 53.0%; P < .001). Among low-risk patients with negative day 46 MRD, those with negative day 19 MRD had superior EFS than those with positive day 19 MRD (91.7% vs 86.1%; P < .001). Optimal use of day 19 MRD could improve individualized treatment and outcomes. This trial was registered at www.chictr.org.cn as #ChiCTR-IPR-14005706.