Loubieres Charlotte, Baudouin Robin, Circiu Marta, Couineau Florent, Crevier-Buchman Lise, Rigal Tiffany, Forges Clémence, Julien-Laferriere Aude, De Pemille Grégoire Vialatte, Lechien Jérôme R, Hans Stéphane
Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery Foch Hospital Suresnes France; School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), 2 Av. de la Source de la Bièvre 78 180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery Foch Hospital Suresnes France; School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), 2 Av. de la Source de la Bièvre 78 180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Oral Oncol. 2025 Feb;161:107178. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107178. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
To compare the surgical, functional and oncological outcomes of Transoral Laser Microsurgery (TLM) and Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) for the treatment of supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma.
Retrospective case series with prospective data.
Tertiary Academic Medical Center.
A chart-review analysis, with prospective follow-up was performed on 122 patients treated for a supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma with either TLM or TORS between 2003 and 2019. Patients were grouped according to the surgical technique used. Clinical, surgical, functional and oncological outcomes were compared, including local and regional controls, DFS, and OS, and postoperative complications.
A total of 122 patients, including 47 treated with TLM and 75 with TORS. Negative margins were observed in n = 12/47 (25.5 %) of TLM cases and n = 4/75 (5.3 %) of TORS cases (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of 5-year local and regional control, however a significant difference was found in disease-free survival and overall survival. The functional laryngeal preservation rate was 97.8 % in the TLM group and 100 % in the TORS group.
Both techniques appear to be safe and effective, though TORS shows superiority in achieving negative margins compared to TLM. Therefore, the choice of technique should be tailored to available resources, surgical team preferences, and experience, while also considering the learning curves associated with each approach.
比较经口激光显微手术(TLM)和经口机器人手术(TORS)治疗声门上型鳞状细胞癌的手术、功能和肿瘤学结局。
带有前瞻性数据的回顾性病例系列研究。
三级学术医学中心。
对2003年至2019年间接受TLM或TORS治疗声门上型鳞状细胞癌的122例患者进行图表回顾分析,并进行前瞻性随访。根据所采用的手术技术对患者进行分组。比较临床、手术、功能和肿瘤学结局,包括局部和区域控制、无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)以及术后并发症。
共有122例患者,其中47例接受TLM治疗,75例接受TORS治疗。TLM组12/47(25.5%)例和TORS组4/75(5.3%)例切缘阴性(p<0.05)。两种技术在5年局部和区域控制方面无显著差异,但在无病生存期和总生存期方面存在显著差异。TLM组喉功能保留率为97.8%,TORS组为100%。
两种技术似乎都是安全有效的,不过与TLM相比,TORS在实现切缘阴性方面显示出优势。因此,技术的选择应根据可用资源、手术团队的偏好和经验进行调整,同时还要考虑每种方法相关的学习曲线。